Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Derik Schröter
dblp:15/2792
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 38% Robot navigation and mapping · 25% Segmentation and scene understanding · 19% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Describing Composite Urban Workspaces · ICRA 2007 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
semantic annotation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Describing Composite Urban Workspaces · ICRA 2007 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
semantic mapping |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Describing Composite Urban Workspaces · ICRA 2007 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Acquiring Models of Rectangular 3D Objects for Robot Maps · ICRA 2004 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
object modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Acquiring Models of Rectangular 3D Objects for Robot Maps · ICRA 2004 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
projective geometry |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Acquiring Models of Rectangular 3D Objects for Robot Maps · ICRA 2004 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Describing Composite Urban Workspaces · ICRA 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised learning · 0.1scene classifiers · 0.1stereo vision · 0.0projective geometry · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Describing Composite Urban WorkspacesabstractIn this paper we present an appearance-based method for augmenting maps of outdoor urban environments with higher-order, semantic labels. Our motivation is to increase the value and utility of the typically low-level representations built by contemporary SLAM algorithms. A supervised learning scheme is employed to train a set of classifiers to respond to common scene attributes given a mixture of geometric and visual scene information. The union of classifier responses yields a composite description of the local workspace. We apply our method to three large data sets Ingmar Posner, Derik Schröter, Paul Newman 0001 |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2007 | Describing, Navigating and Recognising Urban Spaces - Building an End-to-End SLAM System
Paul Newman 0001, Manjari Chandran-Ramesh, Dave Cole, Mark Joseph Cummins, Alastair Harrison, Ingmar Posner, Derik Schröter |
ISRR | 7 |
| 2004 | Acquiring Models of Rectangular 3D Objects for Robot MapsabstractState-of-the-art robot mapping approaches are capable of acquiring impressively accurate 2D and 3D models of their environments. To the best of our knowledge few of them can acquire models of task-relevant objects. In this paper, we introduce a novel method for acquiring models of task-relevant objects from stereo images. The proposed algorithm applies methods from projective geometry and works for rectangular objects, which are, in office- and museum-like environments, the most commonly found subclass of geometric objects. The method is shown to work accurately and for a wide range of viewing angles and distances. Derik Schröter, Michael Beetz |
ICRA | 1 |