EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jure Zabkar
dblp:15/280
· DBLP profile ↗
19ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9459-8562ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 16 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Machine learning and data management · 54% Data mining · 46% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
qualitative reasoning |
0.5 | 3 | 2016 | Extracting qualitative relations from categorical data · Artif. Intell. 2016 Learning Qualitative Models from Numerical Data: Extended abstract · IJCAI 2013 Learning qualitative models from numerical data · Artif. Intell. 2011 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › qualitative reasoning
qualitative model learning |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Learning Qualitative Models from Numerical Data: Extended abstract · IJCAI 2013 Learning qualitative models from numerical data · Artif. Intell. 2011 |
Data mining › statistical analysis
categorical data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Extracting qualitative relations from categorical data · Artif. Intell. 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
argumentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Argument based machine learning · Artif. Intell. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative reasoning · 0.8qualitative model learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Addressing Reviewers Comments: Explaining Voltage Control Decisions: A Scenario-Based Approach in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Blaz Dobravec, Jure Zabkar |
ISMIS | 2 |
| 2019 | Unsupervised Learning from Motion Sensor Data to Assess the Condition of Patients with Parkinson's Disease
Teodora Matic, Somayeh Aghanavesi, Mevludin Memedi, Dag Nyholm, Filip Bergquist, Vida Groznik, Jure Zabkar, Aleksander Sadikov |
AIME | 7 |
| 2019 | Extreme value correction: a method for correcting optimistic estimations in rule learning
Martin Mozina, Janez Demsar, Ivan Bratko, Jure Zabkar |
Mach. Learn. | 4 |
| 2017 | Feasibility of spirography features for objective assessment of motor function in Parkinson's disease
Aleksander Sadikov, Vida Groznik, Martin Mozina, Jure Zabkar, Dag Nyholm, Mevludin Memedi, Ivan Bratko, Dejan Georgiev |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 4 |
| 2016 | Extracting qualitative relations from categorical data
Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko, Janez Demsar |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2015 | Feasibility of Spirography Features for Objective Assessment of Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease
Aleksander Sadikov, Jure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Vida Groznik, Dag Nyholm, Mevludin Memedi |
AIME | 2 |
| 2015 | Qualitative Planning of Object Pushing by a Robot
Domen Soberl, Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko |
ISMIS | 2 |
| 2014 | ParkinsonCheck Smart Phone AppabstractThe paper introduces the ParkinsonCheck application. It is an app for smart phones based on spirography (spiral drawing) intended to detect signs of Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET), which is the main differential diagnosis from PD in the early stage of the disease. The app is equipped with an expert system and is the first such app to be completely automated. Its intended use is twofold: (a) to act as a standalone test for general population, advising potential patients to seek medical help as early as possible, and (b) to be used by neurologists as a portable and inexpensive fully digitalised clinical decision support system. ParkinsonCheck is currently freely available in Slovenia on four mobile platforms as a pilot study. After potentially upgrading its expert system with new learning data, the plan is for it to be translated into English and offered worldwide. Aleksander Sadikov, Vida Groznik, Jure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Dejan Georgiev, Zvezdan Pirtosek, Ivan Bratko |
ECAI | 3 |
| 2013 | Learning Compositional Hierarchies of a Sensorimotor System
Jure Zabkar, Ales Leonardis |
IDA | 1 |
| 2013 | Learning Qualitative Models from Numerical Data: Extended abstract
Jure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Ivan Bratko, Janez Demsar |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2011 | Learning qualitative models from numerical data
Jure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Ivan Bratko, Janez Demsar |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2011 | Embodied Concept Discovery through Qualitative Action ModelsabstractWe present a novel approach to embodied learning of qualitative models. We introduce algorithm STRUDEL that enables an autonomous robot to discover new concepts by performing experiments in its environment. The robot collects data about its actions and its observations of the environment. From the obtained data, the robot learns qualitative descriptive models of the effects that its actions have in the environment. Models are learned using inductive logic programming. We describe two experiments with a humanoid robot Nao in which Nao learns descriptive qualitative models which contain what can be interpreted as simple definitions of the concepts of movability and stability. Aljaz Kosmerlj, Ivan Bratko, Jure Zabkar |
Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. | 3 |
| 2008 | An Experiment in Robot Discovery with ILP
Gregor Leban, Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko |
ILP | 2 |
| 2007 | Argument based machine learning
Martin Mozina, Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko |
Artif. Intell. | 2 |
| 2006 | Argument Based Machine Learning in a Medical Domain
Jure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Jerneja Videcnik, Ivan Bratko |
COMMA | 1 |
| 2006 | Argument Based Rule Learning
Martin Mozina, Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko |
ECAI | 2 |
| 2006 | Why Is Rule Learning Optimistic and How to Correct It
Martin Mozina, Janez Demsar, Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko |
ECML | 3 |
| 2006 | Argument-Based Machine Learning
Ivan Bratko, Martin Mozina, Jure Zabkar |
ISMIS | 3 |
| 2005 | Application of Argument Based Machine Learning to LawabstractIn this paper we discuss the application of a new machine learning approach - argumentation based machine learning - to the legal domain. Argumentation based machine learning is particularly suited to law as it makes use of the justifications of decisions to guide its learning. Importantly, where a large number of decided cases are available, it provides a way of identifying which need to be considered, so that only decisions which will have an influence are examined. Martin Mozina, Jure Zabkar, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Ivan Bratko |
ICAIL | 2 |