Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Jure Zabkar

dblp:15/280 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
19ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9459-8562ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 16 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Machine learning and data management · 54% Data mining · 46%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
qualitative reasoning
0.532016
Extracting qualitative relations from categorical data · Artif. Intell. 2016
Learning Qualitative Models from Numerical Data: Extended abstract · IJCAI 2013
Learning qualitative models from numerical data · Artif. Intell. 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › qualitative reasoning
qualitative model learning
0.322013
Learning Qualitative Models from Numerical Data: Extended abstract · IJCAI 2013
Learning qualitative models from numerical data · Artif. Intell. 2011
Data mining › statistical analysis
categorical data analysis
0.112016
Extracting qualitative relations from categorical data · Artif. Intell. 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
argumentation
0.112007
Argument based machine learning · Artif. Intell. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative reasoning · 0.8qualitative model learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Addressing Reviewers Comments: Explaining Voltage Control Decisions: A Scenario-Based Approach in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Blaz Dobravec, Jure Zabkar
ISMIS2
2019 Unsupervised Learning from Motion Sensor Data to Assess the Condition of Patients with Parkinson's Disease
Teodora Matic, Somayeh Aghanavesi, Mevludin Memedi, Dag Nyholm, Filip Bergquist, Vida Groznik, Jure Zabkar, Aleksander Sadikov
AIME7
2019 Extreme value correction: a method for correcting optimistic estimations in rule learning
Martin Mozina, Janez Demsar, Ivan Bratko, Jure Zabkar
Mach. Learn.4
2017 Feasibility of spirography features for objective assessment of motor function in Parkinson's disease
Aleksander Sadikov, Vida Groznik, Martin Mozina, Jure Zabkar, Dag Nyholm, Mevludin Memedi, Ivan Bratko, Dejan Georgiev
Artif. Intell. Medicine4
2016 Extracting qualitative relations from categorical data
Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko, Janez Demsar
Artif. Intell.1
2015 Feasibility of Spirography Features for Objective Assessment of Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease
Aleksander Sadikov, Jure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Vida Groznik, Dag Nyholm, Mevludin Memedi
AIME2
2015 Qualitative Planning of Object Pushing by a Robot
Domen Soberl, Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko
ISMIS2
2014 ParkinsonCheck Smart Phone App
abstract
The paper introduces the ParkinsonCheck application. It is an app for smart phones based on spirography (spiral drawing) intended to detect signs of Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET), which is the main differential diagnosis from PD in the early stage of the disease. The app is equipped with an expert system and is the first such app to be completely automated. Its intended use is twofold: (a) to act as a standalone test for general population, advising potential patients to seek medical help as early as possible, and (b) to be used by neurologists as a portable and inexpensive fully digitalised clinical decision support system. ParkinsonCheck is currently freely available in Slovenia on four mobile platforms as a pilot study. After potentially upgrading its expert system with new learning data, the plan is for it to be translated into English and offered worldwide.
Aleksander Sadikov, Vida Groznik, Jure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Dejan Georgiev, Zvezdan Pirtosek, Ivan Bratko
ECAI3
2013 Learning Compositional Hierarchies of a Sensorimotor System
Jure Zabkar, Ales Leonardis
IDA1
2013 Learning Qualitative Models from Numerical Data: Extended abstract
Jure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Ivan Bratko, Janez Demsar
IJCAI1
2011 Learning qualitative models from numerical data
Jure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Ivan Bratko, Janez Demsar
Artif. Intell.1
2011 Embodied Concept Discovery through Qualitative Action Models
abstract
We present a novel approach to embodied learning of qualitative models. We introduce algorithm STRUDEL that enables an autonomous robot to discover new concepts by performing experiments in its environment. The robot collects data about its actions and its observations of the environment. From the obtained data, the robot learns qualitative descriptive models of the effects that its actions have in the environment. Models are learned using inductive logic programming. We describe two experiments with a humanoid robot Nao in which Nao learns descriptive qualitative models which contain what can be interpreted as simple definitions of the concepts of movability and stability.
Aljaz Kosmerlj, Ivan Bratko, Jure Zabkar
Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst.3
2008 An Experiment in Robot Discovery with ILP
Gregor Leban, Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko
ILP2
2007 Argument based machine learning
Martin Mozina, Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko
Artif. Intell.2
2006 Argument Based Machine Learning in a Medical Domain
Jure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Jerneja Videcnik, Ivan Bratko
COMMA1
2006 Argument Based Rule Learning
Martin Mozina, Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko
ECAI2
2006 Why Is Rule Learning Optimistic and How to Correct It
Martin Mozina, Janez Demsar, Jure Zabkar, Ivan Bratko
ECML3
2006 Argument-Based Machine Learning
Ivan Bratko, Martin Mozina, Jure Zabkar
ISMIS3
2005 Application of Argument Based Machine Learning to Law
abstract
In this paper we discuss the application of a new machine learning approach - argumentation based machine learning - to the legal domain. Argumentation based machine learning is particularly suited to law as it makes use of the justifications of decisions to guide its learning. Importantly, where a large number of decided cases are available, it provides a way of identifying which need to be considered, so that only decisions which will have an influence are examined.
Martin Mozina, Jure Zabkar, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Ivan Bratko
ICAIL2