Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kazi Saidul Hasan

dblp:15/4016 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 6 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering
0.312017
Improved Neural Relation Detection for Knowledge Base Question Answering · ACL (1) 2017
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge base question answering
relation detection
0.312017
Improved Neural Relation Detection for Knowledge Base Question Answering · ACL (1) 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
argument mining
0.212014
Why are You Taking this Stance? Identifying and Classifying Reasons in Ideological Debates · EMNLP 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
keyphrase extraction
0.212014
Automatic Keyphrase Extraction: A Survey of the State of the Art · ACL (1) 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
stance detection
0.212014
Why are You Taking this Stance? Identifying and Classifying Reasons in Ideological Debates · EMNLP 2014
Knowledge graphs
entity linking
0.112017
Improved Neural Relation Detection for Knowledge Base Question Answering · ACL (1) 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

residual learning · 0.6hierarchical recurrent neural network · 0.6bidirectional LSTM · 0.6survey · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Improved Neural Relation Detection for Knowledge Base Question Answering
abstract
Relation detection is a core component of many NLP applications including Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA).In this paper, we propose a hierarchical recurrent neural network enhanced by residual learning which detects KB relations given an input question.Our method uses deep residual bidirectional LSTMs to compare questions and relation names via different levels of abstraction.Additionally, we propose a simple KBQA system that integrates entity linking and our proposed relation detector to make the two components enhance each other.Our experimental results show that our approach not only achieves outstanding relation detection performance, but more importantly, it helps our KBQA system achieve state-of-the-art accuracy for both single-relation (SimpleQuestions) and multi-relation (WebQSP) QA benchmarks.
Mo Yu, Wenpeng Yin 0001, Kazi Saidul Hasan, Cícero Nogueira dos Santos, Bing Xiang, Bowen Zhou 0002
ACL (1)3
2014 Automatic Keyphrase Extraction: A Survey of the State of the Art
abstract
While automatic keyphrase extraction has been examined extensively, state-of-the-art performance on this task is still much lower than that on many core natural lan-guage processing tasks. We present a sur-vey of the state of the art in automatic keyphrase extraction, examining the major sources of errors made by existing systems and discussing the challenges ahead. 1
Kazi Saidul Hasan, Vincent Ng 0001
ACL (1)1
2014 Why are You Taking this Stance? Identifying and Classifying Reasons in Ideological Debates
abstract
Recent years have seen a surge of interest in stance classification in online debates.Oftentimes, however, it is important to determine not only the stance expressed by an author in her debate posts, but also the reasons behind her supporting or opposing the issue under debate.We therefore examine the new task of reason classification in this paper.Given the close interplay between stance classification and reason classification, we design computational models for examining how automatically computed stance information can be profitably exploited for reason classification.Experiments on our reason-annotated corpus of ideological debate posts from four domains demonstrate that sophisticated models of stances and reasons can indeed yield more accurate reason and stance classification results than their simpler counterparts.
Kazi Saidul Hasan, Vincent Ng 0001
EMNLP1
2013 Frame Semantics for Stance Classification
Kazi Saidul Hasan, Vincent Ng 0001
CoNLL1
2013 Stance Classification of Ideological Debates: Data, Models, Features, and Constraints
Kazi Saidul Hasan, Vincent Ng 0001
IJCNLP1
2009 Weakly Supervised Part-of-Speech Tagging for Morphologically-Rich, Resource-Scarce Languages
Kazi Saidul Hasan, Vincent Ng 0001
EACL1
2009 Learning-Based Named Entity Recognition for Morphologically-Rich, Resource-Scarce Languages
Kazi Saidul Hasan, Altaf Rahman, Vincent Ng 0001
EACL1