Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

John Rae-Grant

dblp:15/4353 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
object-oriented development
0.011997
Changing the Engine of the Car? While Driving 60 Miles an Hour! (Panel) · OOPSLA 1997
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Changing the Engine of the Car? While Driving 60 Miles an Hour! (Panel)
abstract
Most software development projects don't practice what is usually considered "proper" software engineering practices: well-documented, traceable requirements do not exist, formal inspections are non-existent, analysis and design inodels are incomplete or not even done at all, and so forth. We know that many of these projects fail, and it is easy to blame the failure of the project on the lack of good software engineering practices ("If we only had well-documented requirements, a complete and thorough test plan, and formal schedules then we would have been successful!")But many projects that do not practice what many consider to be good software engineering practices succeed, and succeed famously. Examples include the startup introducing a revolutionary new product, the skunkworks project of an established firm that succeeds in changing the status quo, and selecting a mission critical application as the first OO application of a group just beginning to make the transition to the new technology.Gaining a deeper understanding of success and failure on software projects is absolutely essential for the continued maturation of our industry, and object technology in particular.
James Coplien, Luke Hohmann, Norman L. Kerth, John Rae-Grant, Eileen Strider
OOPSLA4