Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Heinz-Theodor Mevissen

dblp:15/5530 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 89% Computational science and engineering · 11%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
bioinformatics resource integration
0.012004
The Helmholtz Network for Bioinformatics: an integrative web portal for bioinformatics resources · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
consensus prediction
0.011999
Decision tree-based formation of consensus protein secondary structure prediction · Bioinform. 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.011999
Decision tree-based formation of consensus protein secondary structure prediction · Bioinform. 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
secondary structure prediction
0.011999
Decision tree-based formation of consensus protein secondary structure prediction · Bioinform. 1999
Computational science and engineering › workflow management
workflow automation
0.012004
The Helmholtz Network for Bioinformatics: an integrative web portal for bioinformatics resources · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

guided questionnaire · 0.0automated pipeline · 0.0decision tree learning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Public microarray repository semantic annotation with ontologies employing text mining and expression profile correlation
David Ruau, Corinna Kolárik, Heinz-Theodor Mevissen, Emmanuel Müller, Ira Assent, Ralph Krieger, Thomas Seidl 0001, Martin Hofmann-Apitius, Martin Zenke
BMC Bioinform.3
2006 The Autoimmune Disease Database: a dynamically compiled literature-derived database
abstract
BACKGROUND: Autoimmune diseases are disorders caused by an immune response directed against the body's own organs, tissues and cells. In practice more than 80 clinically distinct diseases, among them systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, are classified as autoimmune diseases. Although their etiology is unclear these diseases share certain similarities at the molecular level i.e. susceptibility regions on the chromosomes or the involvement of common genes. To gain an overview of these related diseases it is not feasible to do a literary review but it requires methods of automated analyses of the more than 500,000 Medline documents related to autoimmune disorders. RESULTS: In this paper we present the first version of the Autoimmune Disease Database which to our knowledge is the first comprehensive literature-based database covering all known or suspected autoimmune diseases. This dynamically compiled database allows researchers to link autoimmune diseases to the candidate genes or proteins through the use of named entity recognition which identifies genes/proteins in the corresponding Medline abstracts. The Autoimmune Disease Database covers 103 autoimmune disease concepts. This list was expanded to include synonyms and spelling variants yielding a list of over 1,200 disease names. The current version of the database provides links to 541,690 abstracts and over 5,000 unique genes/proteins. CONCLUSION: The Autoimmune Disease Database provides the researcher with a tool to navigate potential gene-disease relationships in Medline abstracts in the context of autoimmune diseases.
Thomas Karopka, Juliane Fluck, Heinz-Theodor Mevissen, Änne Glass
BMC Bioinform.3
2005 ProMiner: rule-based protein and gene entity recognition
abstract
BACKGROUND: Identification of gene and protein names in biomedical text is a challenging task as the corresponding nomenclature has evolved over time. This has led to multiple synonyms for individual genes and proteins, as well as names that may be ambiguous with other gene names or with general English words. The Gene List Task of the BioCreAtIvE challenge evaluation enables comparison of systems addressing the problem of protein and gene name identification on common benchmark data. METHODS: The ProMiner system uses a pre-processed synonym dictionary to identify potential name occurrences in the biomedical text and associate protein and gene database identifiers with the detected matches. It follows a rule-based approach and its search algorithm is geared towards recognition of multi-word names. To account for the large number of ambiguous synonyms in the considered organisms, the system has been extended to use specific variants of the detection procedure for highly ambiguous and case-sensitive synonyms. Based on all detected synonyms for one abstract, the most plausible database identifiers are associated with the text. Organism specificity is addressed by a simple procedure based on additionally detected organism names in an abstract. RESULTS: The extended ProMiner system has been applied to the test cases of the BioCreAtIvE competition with highly encouraging results. In blind predictions, the system achieved an F-measure of approximately 0.8 for the organisms mouse and fly and about 0.9 for the organism yeast.
Daniel Hanisch, Katrin Fundel, Heinz-Theodor Mevissen, Ralf Zimmer, Juliane Fluck
BMC Bioinform.3
2004 The Helmholtz Network for Bioinformatics: an integrative web portal for bioinformatics resources
abstract
SUMMARY: The Helmholtz Network for Bioinformatics (HNB) is a joint venture of eleven German bioinformatics research groups that offers convenient access to numerous bioinformatics resources through a single web portal. The 'Guided Solution Finder' which is available through the HNB portal helps users to locate the appropriate resources to answer their queries by employing a detailed, tree-like questionnaire. Furthermore, automated complex tool cascades ('tasks'), involving resources located on different servers, have been implemented, allowing users to perform comprehensive data analyses without the requirement of further manual intervention for data transfer and re-formatting. Currently, automated cascades for the analysis of regulatory DNA segments as well as for the prediction of protein functional properties are provided. AVAILABILITY: The HNB portal is available at http://www.hnbioinfo.de
Torsten Crass, Iris Antes, Rico Basekow, Peer Bork, Christian Buning, Maik Christensen, Holger Claussen 0002, Christian Ebeling, Peter Ernst, Valérie Gailus-Durner, Karl-Heinz Glatting, Rolf Gohla, Frank Gößling, Korbinian Grote, Karsten R. Heidtke, Alexander Herrmann, Sean O'Keeffe, O. Kießlich, Sven Kolibal, Jan O. Korbel, Thomas Lengauer, Ines Liebich, Mark van der Linden, Hannes Luz, Kathrin Meissner, Christian von Mering, Heinz-Theodor Mevissen, Hans-Werner Mewes, Holger Michael, Martin Mokrejs, Tobias Müller 0001, Heike Pospisil, Matthias Rarey, Jens G. Reich, Ralf Schneider, Dietmar Schomburg, Steffen Schulze-Kremer, Knut Schwarzer, Ingolf Sommer, Stephan Springstubbe, Sándor Suhai, Gnanasekaran Thoppae, Martin Vingron, Jens Warfsmann, Thomas Werner, Daniel Wetzler, Edgar Wingender, Ralf Zimmer
Bioinform.27
1999 Decision tree-based formation of consensus protein secondary structure prediction
abstract
Abstract Motivation: Prediction of protein secondary structure provides information that is useful for other prediction methods like fold recognition and ab initio 3D prediction. A consensus prediction constructed from the output of several methods should yield more reliable results than each of the individual methods. Method: We present an approach that reveals subtle but systematic differences in the output of different secondary structure prediction methods allowing the derivation of coherent consensus predictions. The method uses a machine learning technique that builds decision trees from existing data. Results: The first results of our analysis show that consensus prediction of protein secondary structure may be improved both quantitatively and qualitatively. Availability: Our method for consensus secondary structure prediction CoDe (Consensus formation by Decision tree learning) is based on machine learning and will be integrated into the ToPLign system (Toolbox for Protein aLignment) which can be accessed at http://cartan.gmd.de/ToPLign.html. Contact: {mevissen,selbig}@gmd.de
Joachim Selbig, Heinz-Theodor Mevissen, Thomas Lengauer
Bioinform.2