Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David A. Joiner

dblp:15/5678 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0000-0003-1382-5522ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education › computer science curriculum
high-performance computing education
0.112006
Teaching parallel computing to science faculty: best practices and common pitfalls · PPoPP 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workshop design · 0.1formative evaluation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Teaching parallel computing to science faculty: best practices and common pitfalls
abstract
In 2002, we first brought High Performance Computing (HPC) methods to the college classroom as a way to enrich Computational Science education. Through the years, we have continued to facilitate college faculty in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines to stay current with HPC methodologies. We have accomplished this by designing and delivering faculty workshops, hosted in a variety of lab settings, as well as by developing tools supporting the technical infrastructure necessary for HPC education, all this without requiring access to traditional HPC computing platforms. In all, we have so far presented 16 professional development workshops for close to 400 predominantly undergraduate STEM faculty. This paper presents the result of internal formative evaluation by workshop instructors and the materials and tools developed during that process.We did this work as part of the National Computational Science Institute (NCSI) and in collaboration with the following groups:
David A. Joiner, Paul Gray, Thomas Murphy, Charles Peck 0002
PPoPP1