Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian Rogoff

dblp:15/5818 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Wireless networking · 50% Network performance modeling · 44% Internet architecture and protocols · 6%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless networking › multiple access protocols
backoff protocols
0.021996
Analysis of Backoff Protocols for Multiple Access Channels · SIAM J. Comput. 1996
Analysis of Backoff Protocols for Multiple Access Channels (Extended Abstract) · STOC 1987
Wireless networking
medium access control
0.021996
Analysis of Backoff Protocols for Multiple Access Channels · SIAM J. Comput. 1996
Analysis of Backoff Protocols for Multiple Access Channels (Extended Abstract) · STOC 1987
Network performance modeling
stability analysis
0.021996
Analysis of Backoff Protocols for Multiple Access Channels · SIAM J. Comput. 1996
Analysis of Backoff Protocols for Multiple Access Channels (Extended Abstract) · STOC 1987
Internet architecture and protocols › local area network
ethernet
0.011996
Analysis of Backoff Protocols for Multiple Access Channels · SIAM J. Comput. 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic stability analysis · 0.0markov chain analysis · 0.0stochastic analysis · 0.0queueing analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Analysis of Backoff Protocols for Multiple Access Channels
abstract
In this paper, we analyze the stochastic behavior of backoff protocols for multiple access channels such as the Ethernet. In particular, we prove that binary exponential backoff is unstable if the arrival rate of new messages at each station is $\tfrac{\lambda }{N}$ for any $\lambda > \frac{1}{2}$ and the number of stations N is sufficiently large. For small N, we prove that $\lambda \geqslant \lambda _0 + \frac{1}{{4N - 2}}$` implies instability, where $\lambda _0 \approx .567$. More importantly, we also prove that any superlinear polynomial backoff protocol (e.g., quadratic backoff) is stable for any set of arrival rates that sum to less than one and any number of stations. The results significantly extend the previous work in the area and provide the first examples of acknowledgment-based protocols known to be stable for a nonnegligible overall arrival rate distributed over an arbitrarily large number of stations. The results also disprove a popular assumption that exponential backoff is the best choice among acknowledgment-based protocols for systems with large overall arrival rates. Finally, we prove that any linear or sublinear backoff protocol is unstable if the arrival rate at each station is $\frac{\lambda }{N}$ for any fixed $\lambda $ and sufficiently large N.
Johan Håstad, Frank Thomson Leighton, Brian Rogoff
SIAM J. Comput.3
1987 Analysis of Backoff Protocols for Multiple Access Channels (Extended Abstract)
abstract
In the paper, we analyze the stochastic behavior of backoff protocols for multiple access channels such as the Ethernet. In particular, we prove that binary exponential backoff is unstable if the arrival rate of new messages at each station is λ/N for any number of stations N exceeding 1 and any overall arrival rate λ exceeding .567 + 1/4N - 2. More importantly, we also prove that any superlinear polynomial backoff protocol (e.g., quadratic backoff) is stable for any set of arrival rates that sum to less than one, and any number of stations. The results significantly extend the previous work in the area, and provide the first examples of acknowledgement based protocols known to be stable for a nonnegligible overall arrival rate distributed over an arbitrarily large number of stations. The results also disprove a popular assumption that exponential backoff is the best choice among acknowledgement based protocols for systems with large overall arrival rates. Finally, we prove that any linear or sublinear backoff protocol is unstable if the arrival rate at each station is λ/N for any fixed λ and sufficiently large N.
Johan Håstad, Frank Thomson Leighton, Brian Rogoff
STOC3