Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yi Huang 0013
dblp:15/6040-13
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4920-4333ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 90% Image recognition and object detection · 10% | |
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 82% Digital forensics and information hiding · 18% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploiting Supervised Poison Vulnerability to Strengthen Self-supervised Defense · ECCV (82) 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack
backdoor defense |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploiting Supervised Poison Vulnerability to Strengthen Self-supervised Defense · ECCV (82) 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploiting Supervised Poison Vulnerability to Strengthen Self-supervised Defense · ECCV (82) 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adversarial Attack for Robust Watermark Protection Against Inpainting-based and Blind Watermark Removers · ACM Multimedia 2023 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adversarial Attack for Robust Watermark Protection Against Inpainting-based and Blind Watermark Removers · ACM Multimedia 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transferable Adversarial Attack based on Integrated Gradients · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial transferability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transferable Adversarial Attack based on Integrated Gradients · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
integrated gradients |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transferable Adversarial Attack based on Integrated Gradients · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Transferable Adversarial Attack based on Integrated Gradients · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial attack
adversarial attack on object detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | New Threats Against Object Detector with Non-local Block · ECCV (20) 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | New Threats Against Object Detector with Non-local Block · ECCV (20) 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | New Threats Against Object Detector with Non-local Block · ECCV (20) 2020 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Leveraging Imperfect Restoration for Data Availability Attack · ECCV (73) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised poisoning · 1.5self-supervised learning · 1.5imperfect restoration · 1.5adversarial perturbation · 1.1watermark positioning network · 0.7attribution-guided attack · 0.7integrated gradients · 0.6gradient-based attack · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Transferable Attack against Face Swapping in an Extended SpaceabstractAlthough deep Face Swapping (FS) models may benefit the entertainment industry, they pose severe threats to privacy and security. Existing protections, including deepfake detection and adversarial perturbation, are either passive responses or ineffective to unseen subject-agnostic FS models. In this paper, we propose a transferable attack against subject-agnostic FS models named Additive Identity attack based on a Relighting function (AIR). AIR leverages reillumination and additive perturbations to mislead the identity extraction modules in subject-agnostic FS models. By using these two types of perturbations simultaneously, the attack space is extended such that stronger but more visually natural adversarial examples can be identified. To further enhance the visual quality while preserving the effectiveness of the attack, an adaptive translation-invariant operation and an illumination control scheme are designed for AIR. Unlike other methods, AIR does not require a surrogate FS model to achieve high transferability. In addition, a mathematical proof is given for the extension of the attack space. Extensive experiments using 1000 image pairs across various state-of-the-art subject-agnostic FS models, including GAN and diffusion-based FS models, show that AIR surpasses all existing attacks in terms of both attack success rate and image quality. Mingzhi Lyu, Yi Huang 0013, Adams Wai-Kin Kong |
ICME | 2 |
| 2024 | Leveraging Imperfect Restoration for Data Availability Attack
Yi Huang 0013, Jeremy Styborski, Mingzhi Lyu, Fan Wang 0018, Adams Wai-Kin Kong |
ECCV (73) | 1 |
| 2024 | Exploiting Supervised Poison Vulnerability to Strengthen Self-supervised Defense
Jeremy Styborski, Mingzhi Lyu, Yi Huang 0013, Adams Wai-Kin Kong |
ECCV (82) | 3 |
| 2023 | Adversarial Attack for Robust Watermark Protection Against Inpainting-based and Blind Watermark RemoversabstractThe rise of social media platforms, especially those focusing on image sharing, has made visible watermarks increasingly important in protecting image copyrights. However, multiple studies have revealed that watermarks are vulnerable to both inpainting-based removers and blind watermark removers. Though two adversarial attack methods have been proposed to defend against watermark removers, they are tailored to a particular type of removers in a white-box setting, which significantly limits their practicality and applicability. To date, there is no adversarial attack method that can protect watermarks against the two types of watermark removers simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a novel method, named Adversarial Watermark Defender with Attribution-Guided Perturbation (AWD-AGP), that defends against both inpainting-based and blind watermark removers under a black-box setting. AWD-AGP is the first watermark protection method employing adversarial location. The adversarial location is generated by a Watermark Positioning Network, which predicts an optimal location for watermark placement, making watermark removal challenging for inpainting-based removers. Since inpainting-based removers and blind watermark removers exploit information in different regions of an image to perform removal, we propose an attribution-guided scheme, which automatically assigns attack strengths to different pixels against different removers. With this design, the generated perturbation can attack the two types of watermark removers concurrently. Experiments on seven models, including four inpainting-based removers and three blind watermark removers demonstrate the effectiveness of AWD-AGP. Mingzhi Lyu, Yi Huang 0013, Adams Wai-Kin Kong |
ACM Multimedia | 2 |
| 2022 | Transferable Adversarial Attack based on Integrated Gradients
Yi Huang 0013, Adams Wai-Kin Kong |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | New Threats Against Object Detector with Non-local Block
Yi Huang 0013, Fan Wang 0018, Adams Wai-Kin Kong, Kwok-Yan Lam |
ECCV (20) | 1 |
| 2019 | Adversarial Signboard against Object Detector
Yi Huang 0013, Adams Wai-Kin Kong, Kwok-Yan Lam |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2019 | Attacking Object Detectors Without Changing the Target Object
Yi Huang 0013, Adams Wai-Kin Kong, Kwok-Yan Lam |
PRICAI (3) | 1 |