Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul S. Bradley

dblp:15/6333 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
10as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers
Data mining · 81% Query processing and optimization · 19%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 27% Segmentation and scene understanding · 27% Representation and self-supervised learning · 18%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
clustering
0.152001
Initialization of Iterative Refinement Clustering Algorithms · KDD 1998
Scaling Clustering Algorithms to Large Databases · KDD 1998
Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering · ICML 1998
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
change detection
0.012001
Model Based Population Tracking and Automatic Detection of Distribution Changes · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model
0.012001
Model Based Population Tracking and Automatic Detection of Distribution Changes · NIPS 2001
Data mining › pattern mining › itemset mining
frequent itemset mining
0.012001
Efficient discovery of error-tolerant frequent itemsets in high dimensions · KDD 2001
Data mining
pattern mining
0.012001
Efficient discovery of error-tolerant frequent itemsets in high dimensions · KDD 2001
Query processing and optimization
approximate query processing
0.011999
Compressed Data Cubes for OLAP Aggregate Query Approximation on Continuous Dimensions · KDD 1999
Query processing and optimization › OLAP
compressed cube
0.011999
Compressed Data Cubes for OLAP Aggregate Query Approximation on Continuous Dimensions · KDD 1999
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.011998
Feature Selection via Concave Minimization and Support Vector Machines · ICML 1998
Data mining › clustering › k-means clustering
k-means initialization
0.011998
Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering · ICML 1998
Data mining › clustering
large-scale clustering
0.011998
Scaling Clustering Algorithms to Large Databases · KDD 1998
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
model-based tracking
0.012001
Model Based Population Tracking and Automatic Detection of Distribution Changes · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.012001
Model Based Population Tracking and Automatic Detection of Distribution Changes · NIPS 2001
Data mining › clustering
categorical data clustering
0.012001
Efficient discovery of error-tolerant frequent itemsets in high dimensions · KDD 2001
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine
0.011998
Feature Selection via Concave Minimization and Support Vector Machines · ICML 1998
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
weight initialization
0.011998
Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering · ICML 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

seeding · 0.0k-means · 0.0concave minimization · 0.0transaction coverage · 0.0sparse data clustering · 0.0probabilistic mixture model · 0.0data cube compression · 0.0support vector machine · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 On the Use of Wavelet Decomposition for String Classification
Charu C. Aggarwal, Paul S. Bradley
Data Min. Knowl. Discov.2
2003 Data Mining as an Automated Service
Paul S. Bradley
PAKDD1
2001 Efficient discovery of error-tolerant frequent itemsets in high dimensions
abstract
We present a generalization of frequent itemsets allowing for the notion of errors in the itemset definition. We motivate the problem and present an efficient algorithm that identifies error-tolerant frequent clusters of items in transactional data (customer-purchase data, web browsing data, text, etc.). The algorithm exploits sparseness of the underlying data to find large groups of items that are correlated over database records (rows). The notion of transaction coverage allows us to extend the algorithm and view it as a fast clustering algorithm for discovering segments of similar transactions in binary sparse data. We evaluate the new algorithm on three real-world applications: clustering high-dimensional data, query selectivity estimation and collaborative filtering. Results show that the algorithm consistently uncovers structure in large sparse databases that other traditional clustering algorithms fail to find.
Usama M. Fayyad, Paul S. Bradley
KDD3
2001 Model Based Population Tracking and Automatic Detection of Distribution Changes
abstract
Probabilistic mixture models are used for a broad range of data anal- ysis tasks such as clustering, classification, predictive modeling, etc. Due to their inherent probabilistic nature, mixture models can easily be combined with other probabilistic or non-probabilistic techniques thus forming more complex data analysis systems. In the case of online data (where there is a stream of data available) models can be constantly up- dated to reflect the most current distribution of the incoming data. How- ever, in many business applications the models themselves represent a parsimonious summary of the data and therefore it is not desirable to change models frequently, much less with every new data point. In such a framework it becomes crucial to track the applicability of the mixture model and detect the point in time when the model fails to adequately represent the data. In this paper we formulate the problem of change detection and propose a principled solution. Empirical results over both synthetic and real-life data sets are presented. 1 Introduction and Notation Consider a data set D = fx1; x2; : : : ; xng consisting of n independent, identically dis- tributed (iid) data points. In context of this paper the data points could be vectors, se- quences, etc. Further, consider a probabilistic mixture model that maps each data set to a real number, the probability of observing the data set:
Igor V. Cadez, Paul S. Bradley
NIPS2
2000 Clustering Very Large Databases Using EM Mixture Models
abstract
Clustering very large databases is a challenge for traditional pattern recognition algorithms, e.g. the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for fitting mixture models, because of high memory and iteration requirements. Over large databases, the cost of the numerous scans required to converge and large memory requirement of the algorithm becomes prohibitive. We present a decomposition of the EM algorithm requiring a small amount of memory by limiting iterations to small data subsets. The scalable EM approach requires at most one database scan and is based on identifying regions of the data that are discardable, regions that are compressible, and regions that must be maintained in memory. Data resolution is preserved to the extent possible based upon the size of the memory buffer and fit of the current model to the data. Computational tests demonstrate that the scalable scheme outperforms similarly constrained EM approaches.
Paul S. Bradley, Cory Reina, Usama M. Fayyad
ICPR1
2000 k-Plane Clustering
Paul S. Bradley, Olvi L. Mangasarian
J. Glob. Optim.1
1999 Compressed Data Cubes for OLAP Aggregate Query Approximation on Continuous Dimensions
abstract
of pre-computation are to be realized.Efficiently answering decision support queries is an important problem.Most of the work in this direction has been in the context of the data cube.Queries are efficiently answered by pre-computing large parts of the cube.Besides having large space requirements, such pre-computation requires that the hierarchy along each dimension be fixed (hence dimensions are categorical or prediscretized).Queries that take advantage of pre-computation can thus only drill-down or roll-up along this fixed hierarchy.Another disadvantage of existing pre-computation techniques is that the target measure, along with the aggregation function of interest, is fixed for each cube.Queries over more than one target measure or using different aggregation functions, would require pre-computing larger data cubes.In this paper, we propose a new compressed representation of the data cube that (a) drastically reduces storage requirements, (b) does not require the discretization hierarchy along each query dimension to be fixed beforehand and (c) treats each dimension as a potential target measure and supports multiple aggregation functions without additional storage costs.The tradeoff is approximate, yet relatively accurate, answers to queries.We outline mechanjsms to reduce the error in the approximation.Our performance evaluation indicates that our compression technique effectively addresses the limitations of existing approaches.
Jayavel Shanmugasundaram, Usama M. Fayyad, Paul S. Bradley
KDD3
1999 Mathematical Programming for Data Mining: Formulations and Challenges
abstract
This article is intended to serve as an overview of a rapidly emerging research and applications area. In addition to providing a general overview, motivating the importance of data mining problems within the area of knowledge discovery in databases, our aim is to list some of the pressing research challenges, and outline opportunities for contributions by the optimization research communities. Towards these goals, we include formulations of the basic categories of data mining methods as optimization problems. We also provide examples of successful mathematical programming approaches to some data mining problems.
Paul S. Bradley, Usama M. Fayyad, Olvi L. Mangasarian
INFORMS J. Comput.1
1998 Parsimonious side propagation
abstract
A fast parsimonious linear-programming-based algorithm for training neural networks is proposed that suppresses redundant features while using a minimal tra number of hidden units. This is achieved by propagating sideways to newly added hidden units the task of separating successive groups of unclassified points. Computational results show an improvement of 26.53% and 19.76% in tenfold cross-validation test correctness over a parsimonious perceptron on two publicly available datasets.
Paul S. Bradley, Olvi L. Mangasarian
ICASSP1
1998 Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering
Paul S. Bradley, Usama M. Fayyad
ICML1
1998 Feature Selection via Concave Minimization and Support Vector Machines
Paul S. Bradley, Olvi L. Mangasarian
ICML1
1998 Scaling Clustering Algorithms to Large Databases
Paul S. Bradley, Usama M. Fayyad, Cory Reina
KDD1
1998 Initialization of Iterative Refinement Clustering Algorithms
Usama M. Fayyad, Cory Reina, Paul S. Bradley
KDD3
1998 Feature Selection via Mathematical Programming
abstract
The problem of discriminating between two finite point sets in n-dimensional feature space by a separating plane that utilizes as few of the features as possible is formulated as a mathematical program with a parametric objective function and linear constraints. The step function that appears in the objective function can be approximated by a sigmoid or by a concave exponential on the nonnegative real line, or it can be treated exactly by considering the equivalent linear program with equilibrium constraints. Computational tests of these three approaches on publicly available real-world databases have been carried out and compared with an adaptation of the optimal brain damage method for reducing neural network complexity. One feature selection algorithm via concave minimization reduced cross-validation error on a cancer prognosis database by 35.4% while reducing problem features from 32 to 4.
Paul S. Bradley, Olvi L. Mangasarian, W. Nick Street
INFORMS J. Comput.1
1996 Clustering via Concave Minimization
Paul S. Bradley, Olvi L. Mangasarian, W. Nick Street
NIPS1