Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ertugrul Yilmaz
dblp:15/8431
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Transport protocols and congestion control · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Transport protocols and congestion control
selective acknowledgment |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Non-Renegable Selective Acknowledgments (NR-SACKs) for SCTP · ICNP 2008 |
Transport protocols and congestion control › reliable transport protocol
stream control transmission protocol |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Non-Renegable Selective Acknowledgments (NR-SACKs) for SCTP · ICNP 2008 |
Transport protocols and congestion control › multipath transport
concurrent multipath transfer |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Non-Renegable Selective Acknowledgments (NR-SACKs) for SCTP · ICNP 2008 |
Transport protocols and congestion control
multipath transport |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Non-Renegable Selective Acknowledgments (NR-SACKs) for SCTP · ICNP 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Throughput analysis of Non-Renegable Selective Acknowledgments (NR-SACKs) for SCTP
Ertugrul Yilmaz, Nasif Ekiz, Preethi Natarajan, Paul D. Amer, Jonathan T. Leighton, Fred Baker, Randall R. Stewart |
Comput. Commun. | 1 |
| 2008 | Non-Renegable Selective Acknowledgments (NR-SACKs) for SCTPabstractIn both TCP and SCTP, selectively acked (SACKed) out-of-order data is implicitly renegable; that is, the receiver can later discard SACKed data. The possibility of reneging forces the transport sender to maintain copies of SACKed data in the send buffer until they are cumulatively acked. In this paper, we investigate the situation where all out-of-order data is non-renegable, such as when the data has been delivered to the application, or when the receiver simply never reneges. Using simulations, we show that SACKs result in inevitable send buffer wastage, which increases as frequency of loss events and loss recovery durations increase. We introduce a fundamentally new ack mechanism, Non-Renegable Selective Acknowledgments (NR-SACKs), for SCTP. Using NR-SACKs, an SCTP receiver can explicitly identify some or all out-of-order data as being non-renegable, allowing the sender to free up send buffer sooner than if the data were only SACKed. Simulation comparisons show that NR-SACKs enable efficient utilization of a transport senderpsilas memory. Further investigations show that NR-SACKs also improve throughput in Concurrent Multipath Transfer (CMT) [4]. Preethi Natarajan, Nasif Ekiz, Ertugrul Yilmaz, Paul D. Amer, Janardhan R. Iyengar, Randall R. Stewart |
ICNP | 3 |