Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

V. M. Megler

dblp:15/9884 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 54% Data integration and cleaning · 46%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
dataset similarity
0.422015
Are Data Sets Like Documents?: Evaluating Similarity-Based Ranked Search over Scientific Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015
Demonstrating "Data Near Here": Scientific Data Search · SIGMOD Conference 2015
Information retrieval › retrieval models
ranked retrieval
0.212015
Are Data Sets Like Documents?: Evaluating Similarity-Based Ranked Search over Scientific Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.212015
Demonstrating "Data Near Here": Scientific Data Search · SIGMOD Conference 2015
Information retrieval
search engines
0.212015
Demonstrating "Data Near Here": Scientific Data Search · SIGMOD Conference 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.2prototype evaluation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Demonstrating "Data Near Here": Scientific Data Search
abstract
Prior work proposed "Data Near Here" (DNH), a data search engine for scientific archives that is modeled on Internet search engines. DNH performs a periodic, asynchronous scan of each dataset in an archive, extracting lightweight features that are combined to form a dataset summary. During a search, DNH assesses the similarity of the search terms to the summary features and returns to the user, at interactive timescales, a ranked list of datasets for further exploration and analysis. We will demonstrate the search capabilities and ancillary metadata-browsing features for an archive of observational oceanographic data. While comparing search terms to complete datasets might seem ideal, interactive search speed would be impossible with archives of realistic size. We include an analysis showing that our summary-based approach gives a reasonable approximation of such a "complete dataset" similarity measure.
V. M. Megler, David Maier 0001
SIGMOD Conference1
2015 Are Data Sets Like Documents?: Evaluating Similarity-Based Ranked Search over Scientific Data
abstract
The past decade has seen a dramatic increase in the amount of data captured and made available to scientists for research. This increase amplifies the difficulty scientists face in finding the data most relevant to their information needs. In prior work, we hypothesized that Information Retrieval-style ranked search can be applied to data sets to help a scientist discover the most relevant data amongst the thousands of data sets in many formats, much like text-based ranked search helps users make sense of the vast number of Internet documents. To test this hypothesis, we explored the use of ranked search for scientific data using an existing multi-terabyte observational archive as our test-bed. In this paper, we investigate whether the concept of varying relevance, and therefore ranked search, applies to numeric data-that is, are data sets are enough like documents for Information Retrieval techniques and evaluation measures to apply? We present a user study that demonstrates that data set similarity resonates with users as a basis for relevance and, therefore, for ranked search. We evaluate a prototype implementation of ranked search over data sets with a second user study and demonstrate that ranked search improves a scientist's ability to find needed data.
V. M. Megler, David Maier 0001
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2014 Challenges for Dataset Search
David Maier 0001, V. M. Megler, Kristin Tufte
DASFAA (1)2
2012 Navigating Oceans of Data
David Maier 0001, V. M. Megler, António M. Baptista, Alex Jaramillo, Charles Seaton, Paul J. Turner
SSDBM2
2011 Finding Haystacks with Needles: Ranked Search for Data Using Geospatial and Temporal Characteristics
V. M. Megler, David Maier 0001
SSDBM1