Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matej Hertis

dblp:150/0613 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 67% Services computing and microservices · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Services computing and microservices
business process management
0.212014
An Empirical Analysis of Business Process Execution Language Usage · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2014
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.212014
An Empirical Analysis of Business Process Execution Language Usage · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2014
Empirical software engineering
process mining
0.212014
An Empirical Analysis of Business Process Execution Language Usage · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical analysis · 0.2complexity metrics · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 An Empirical Analysis of Business Process Execution Language Usage
abstract
The current state of executable business process languages allows for and demands optimization of design practices and specifications. In this paper, we present the first empirical study that analyses Web Services Business Process Execution Language (WS-BPEL or BPEL) usage and characteristics of real world executable business processes. We have analysed 1,145 BPEL processes by measuring activity usage and process complexity. In addition, we investigated the occurrence of activity usage patterns. The results revealed that the usage frequency of BPEL activities varies and that some activities have a strong co-occurrence. BPEL activities often appear in activity patterns that are repeated in multiple processes. Furthermore, the current process complexity metrics have proved to be inadequate for measuring BPEL process complexity. The empirical results provide fundamental knowledge on how BPEL specification and process design practices can be improved. We propose BPEL design guidelines and BPEL language improvements for the design of more understandable and less complex processes. The results are of interest to business process language designers, business process tool developers, business process designers and developers, and software engineering researchers, and contribute to the general understanding of BPEL and service-oriented architecture.
Matej Hertis, Matjaz B. Juric
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1