Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kevin J. Dawson
dblp:150/1221
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration counts · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
mutual exclusivity analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration counts · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration counts · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
switching-algorithm · 0.2monte carlo method · 0.2bipartite network · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Fast randomization of large genomic datasets while preserving alteration countsabstractMOTIVATION: Studying combinatorial patterns in cancer genomic datasets has recently emerged as a tool for identifying novel cancer driver networks. Approaches have been devised to quantify, for example, the tendency of a set of genes to be mutated in a 'mutually exclusive' manner. The significance of the proposed metrics is usually evaluated by computing P-values under appropriate null models. To this end, a Monte Carlo method (the switching-algorithm) is used to sample simulated datasets under a null model that preserves patient- and gene-wise mutation rates. In this method, a genomic dataset is represented as a bipartite network, to which Markov chain updates (switching-steps) are applied. These steps modify the network topology, and a minimal number of them must be executed to draw simulated datasets independently under the null model. This number has previously been deducted empirically to be a linear function of the total number of variants, making this process computationally expensive. RESULTS: We present a novel approximate lower bound for the number of switching-steps, derived analytically. Additionally, we have developed the R package BiRewire, including new efficient implementations of the switching-algorithm. We illustrate the performances of BiRewire by applying it to large real cancer genomics datasets. We report vast reductions in time requirement, with respect to existing implementations/bounds and equivalent P-value computations. Thus, we propose BiRewire to study statistical properties in genomic datasets, and other data that can be modeled as bipartite networks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: BiRewire is available on BioConductor at http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.13/bioc/html/BiRewire.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Andrea Gobbi, Francesco Iorio, Kevin J. Dawson, David C. Wedge, David Tamborero, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Núria López-Bigas, Mathew Garnett, Giuseppe Jurman, Julio Saez-Rodriguez |
Bioinform. | 3 |