Martin Dixon

dblp:150/2180 · also Martin G. Dixon · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-4933-4167ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 62% Electronic design automation · 38%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
analytical modeling
0.912025
Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025
Electronic design automation
design space exploration
0.912025
Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation › surrogate modeling
machine-learning-based performance modeling
0.912025
Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025
Electronic design automation › design space exploration
microarchitecture design space exploration
0.912025
Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation
processor performance modeling
0.912025
Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › architectural simulation
cycle-accurate simulation
0.312025
Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion · ISCA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.9analytical modeling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Concorde: Fast and Accurate CPU Performance Modeling with Compositional Analytical-ML Fusion
abstract
Cycle-level simulators such as gem5 are widely used in microarchitecture design, but they are prohibitively slow for large-scale design space explorations.We present Concorde, a new methodology for learning fast and accurate performance models of microarchitectures.Unlike existing simulators and learning approaches that emulate each instruction, Concorde predicts the behavior of a program based on compact performance distributions that capture the impact of different microarchitectural components.It derives these performance distributions using simple analytical models that estimate bounds on performance induced by each microarchitectural component, providing a simple yet rich representation of a program's performance characteristics across a large space of microarchitectural parameters.Experiments show that Concorde is more than five orders of magnitude faster than a reference cycle-level simulator, with about 2% average Cycles-Per-Instruction (CPI) prediction error across a range of SPEC, open-source, and proprietary benchmarks.This enables rapid design-space exploration and performance sensitivity analyses that are currently infeasible, e.g., in about an hour, we conducted a first-of-its-kind fine-grained performance attribution to different microarchitectural components across a diverse set of programs, requiring nearly 150 million CPI evaluations.
Arash Nasr-Esfahany, Mohammad Alizadeh, Victor Lee, Hanna Alam, Brett W. Coon, David E. Culler, Vidushi Dadu, Martin Dixon, Henry M. Levy, Santosh Pandey 0001, Parthasarathy Ranganathan, Amir Yazdanbakhsh
ISCA8
2019 An Increasing Need for Formality (Keynote)
abstract
The talk will touch on a number of practical opportunities for formal modeling and methods that Intel sees in HW security research including: instruction sets; the proliferation of programmable agents within SoCs; and negative space testing.
Martin Dixon
FMCAD1
2019 An Increasing Need for Formality (Invited Talk)
abstract
The talk will touch on a number of practical opportunities for formal modeling and methods that Intel sees in HW security research including: instruction sets; the proliferation of programmable agents within SoC’s; and negative space testing.
Martin Dixon
ITP1
2015 Specialized Evolution of the General Purpose CPU
Ravi Rajwar, Martin Dixon, Ronak Singhal
CIDR2