Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anindita Dutta

dblp:150/2953 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0003-0676-5226ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein sequence analysis
0.212015
Comparative study of the effectiveness and limitations of current methods for detecting sequence coevolution · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.212015
Comparative study of the effectiveness and limitations of current methods for detecting sequence coevolution · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
residue contact prediction
0.212015
Comparative study of the effectiveness and limitations of current methods for detecting sequence coevolution · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein dynamics
0.212014
Evol and ProDy for bridging protein sequence evolution and structural dynamics · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
protein evolution
0.212014
Evol and ProDy for bridging protein sequence evolution and structural dynamics · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology › protein structure and function
protein structure and dynamics
0.212014
Evol and ProDy for bridging protein sequence evolution and structural dynamics · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
sequence evolution
0.212014
Evol and ProDy for bridging protein sequence evolution and structural dynamics · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
coevolution analysis
0.112014
Evol and ProDy for bridging protein sequence evolution and structural dynamics · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

shuffling · 0.2mutual information · 0.2direct coupling analysis · 0.2information-theoretic approaches · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Comparative study of the effectiveness and limitations of current methods for detecting sequence coevolution
abstract
MOTIVATION: With rapid accumulation of sequence data on several species, extracting rational and systematic information from multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) is becoming increasingly important. Currently, there is a plethora of computational methods for investigating coupled evolutionary changes in pairs of positions along the amino acid sequence, and making inferences on structure and function. Yet, the significance of coevolution signals remains to be established. Also, a large number of false positives (FPs) arise from insufficient MSA size, phylogenetic background and indirect couplings. RESULTS: Here, a set of 16 pairs of non-interacting proteins is thoroughly examined to assess the effectiveness and limitations of different methods. The analysis shows that recent computationally expensive methods designed to remove biases from indirect couplings outperform others in detecting tertiary structural contacts as well as eliminating intermolecular FPs; whereas traditional methods such as mutual information benefit from refinements such as shuffling, while being highly efficient. Computations repeated with 2,330 pairs of protein families from the Negatome database corroborated these results. Finally, using a training dataset of 162 families of proteins, we propose a combined method that outperforms existing individual methods. Overall, the study provides simple guidelines towards the choice of suitable methods and strategies based on available MSA size and computing resources. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software is freely available through the Evol component of ProDy API.
Wenzhi Mao, Cihan Kaya, Anindita Dutta, Amnon Horovitz, Ivet Bahar
Bioinform.3
2014 Evol and ProDy for bridging protein sequence evolution and structural dynamics
abstract
UNLABELLED: Correlations between sequence evolution and structural dynamics are of utmost importance in understanding the molecular mechanisms of function and their evolution. We have integrated Evol, a new package for fast and efficient comparative analysis of evolutionary patterns and conformational dynamics, into ProDy, a computational toolbox designed for inferring protein dynamics from experimental and theoretical data. Using information-theoretic approaches, Evol coanalyzes conservation and coevolution profiles extracted from multiple sequence alignments of protein families with their inferred dynamics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ProDy and Evol are open-source and freely available under MIT License from http://prody.csb.pitt.edu/.
Ahmet Bakan, Anindita Dutta, Wenzhi Mao, S. Chakra Chennubhotla, Timothy R. Lezon, Ivet Bahar
Bioinform.2