Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Till Kroeger

dblp:150/4235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
3D vision · 67% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 10%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 88% Computational geometry · 12%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera pose estimation
0.312017
Consensus Maximization with Linear Matrix Inequality Constraints · CVPR 2017
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation
0.312017
Consensus Maximization with Linear Matrix Inequality Constraints · CVPR 2017
Mathematical optimization › global optimization
consensus maximization
0.312017
Consensus Maximization with Linear Matrix Inequality Constraints · CVPR 2017
Mathematical optimization
global optimization
0.312017
Consensus Maximization with Linear Matrix Inequality Constraints · CVPR 2017
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.212016
Fast Optical Flow Using Dense Inverse Search · ECCV (4) 2016
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera calibration
0.212015
Joint vanishing point extraction and tracking · CVPR 2015
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › feature-based transfer learning
manifold transfer learning
0.212015
Metric imitation by manifold transfer for efficient vision applications · CVPR 2015
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning
0.212015
Metric imitation by manifold transfer for efficient vision applications · CVPR 2015
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning
0.212015
Metric imitation by manifold transfer for efficient vision applications · CVPR 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
vanishing point estimation
0.212015
Joint vanishing point extraction and tracking · CVPR 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion
0.212014
Video Registration to SfM Models · ECCV (5) 2014
Computational geometry › geometric modeling and processing
geometric constraints
0.112017
Consensus Maximization with Linear Matrix Inequality Constraints · CVPR 2017
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
linear matrix inequality
0.112017
Consensus Maximization with Linear Matrix Inequality Constraints · CVPR 2017
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
multi-object tracking
0.112015
Joint vanishing point extraction and tracking · CVPR 2015
Image and video processing › super-resolution › image super-resolution
example-based super-resolution
0.112015
Metric imitation by manifold transfer for efficient vision applications · CVPR 2015
Image and video processing › super-resolution
image super-resolution
0.112015
Metric imitation by manifold transfer for efficient vision applications · CVPR 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear matrix inequality constraints · 0.6branch-and-bound · 0.6RANSAC · 0.6semidefinite programming · 0.4manifold geometry · 0.4dense inverse search · 0.2probabilistic occupancy fields · 0.2linear programming · 0.2gaussian sphere · 0.2structure from motion · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Consensus Maximization with Linear Matrix Inequality Constraints
abstract
Consensus maximization has proven to be a useful tool for robust estimation. While randomized methods like RANSAC are fast, they do not guarantee global optimality and fail to manage large amounts of outliers. On the other hand, global methods are commonly slow because they do not exploit the structure of the problem at hand. In this paper, we show that the solution space can be reduced by introducing Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) constraints. This leads to significant speed ups of the optimization time even for large amounts of outliers, while maintaining global optimality. We study several cases in which the objective variables have a special structure, such as rotation, scaled-rotation, and essential matrices, which are posed as LMI constraints. This is very useful in several standard computer vision problems, such as estimating Similarity Transformations, Absolute Poses, and Relative Poses, for which we obtain compelling results on both synthetic and real datasets. With up to 90 percent outlier rate, where RANSAC often fails, our constrained approach is consistently faster than the non-constrained one - while finding the same global solution.
Pablo Speciale, Danda Pani Paudel, Martin R. Oswald, Till Kroeger, Luc Van Gool, Marc Pollefeys
CVPR4
2016 Fast Optical Flow Using Dense Inverse Search
Till Kroeger, Radu Timofte, Dengxin Dai, Luc Van Gool
ECCV (4)1
2015 Metric imitation by manifold transfer for efficient vision applications
abstract
Metric learning has proved very successful. However, human annotations are necessary. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised method, dubbed Metric Imitation (MI), where metrics over cheap features (target features, TFs) are learned by imitating the standard metrics over more sophisticated, off-the-shelf features (source features, SFs) by transferring view-independent property manifold structures. In particular, MI consists of: 1) quantifying the properties of source metrics as manifold geometry, 2) transferring the manifold from source domain to target domain, and 3) learning a mapping of TFs so that the manifold is approximated as well as possible in the mapped feature domain. MI is useful in at least two scenarios where: 1) TFs are more efficient computationally and in terms of memory than SFs; and 2) SFs contain privileged information, but are not available during testing. For the former, MI is evaluated on image clustering, category-based image retrieval, and instance-based object retrieval, with three SFs and three TFs. For the latter, MI is tested on the task of example-based image super-resolution, where high-resolution patches are taken as SFs and low-resolution patches as TFs. Experiments show that MI is able to provide good metrics while avoiding expensive data labeling efforts and that it achieves state-of-the-art performance for image super-resolution. In addition, manifold transfer is an interesting direction of transfer learning.
Dengxin Dai, Till Kroeger, Radu Timofte, Luc Van Gool
CVPR2
2015 Joint vanishing point extraction and tracking
abstract
We present a novel vanishing point (VP) detection and tracking algorithm for calibrated monocular image sequences. Previous VP detection and tracking methods usually assume known camera poses for all frames or detect and track separately. We advance the state-of-the-art by combining VP extraction on a Gaussian sphere with recent advances in multi-target tracking on probabilistic occupancy fields. The solution is obtained by solving a Linear Program (LP). This enables the joint detection and tracking of multiple VPs over sequences. Unlike existing works we do not need known camera poses, and at the same time avoid detecting and tracking in separate steps. We also propose an extension to enforce VP orthogonality. We augment an existing video dataset consisting of 48 monocular videos with multiple annotated VPs in 14448 frames for evaluation. Although the method is designed for unknown camera poses, it is also helpful in scenarios with known poses, since a multi-frame approach in VP detection helps to regularize in frames with weak VP line support.
Till Kroeger, Dengxin Dai, Luc Van Gool
CVPR1
2014 Video Registration to SfM Models
Till Kroeger, Luc Van Gool
ECCV (5)1