Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shervin Ardeshir
dblp:150/4238
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
7as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5760-1665ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 7 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 41% 3D vision · 22% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › multi-camera video analysis
cross-view video analysis |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Egocentric Meets Top-View · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 Integrating Egocentric Videos in Top-View Surveillance Videos: Joint Identification and Temporal Alignment · ECCV (11) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Estimating Structural Disparities for Face Models · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision
stereo matching |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Estimating Structural Disparities for Face Models · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
egocentric video understanding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Egocentric Meets Top-View · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
temporal alignment |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Egocentric Meets Top-View · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Geo-semantic segmentation · CVPR 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | GPS-Tag Refinement Using Random Walks with an Adaptive Damping Factor · CVPR 2014 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › social media analysis
geotagged photo analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | GPS-Tag Refinement Using Random Walks with an Adaptive Damping Factor · CVPR 2014 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial attribute analysis
facial attribute recognition |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Estimating Structural Disparities for Face Models · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
person re-identification |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Integrating Egocentric Videos in Top-View Surveillance Videos: Joint Identification and Temporal Alignment · ECCV (11) 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
geo-referencing |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Geo-semantic segmentation · CVPR 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random walk · 0.6temporal alignment · 0.6face recognition embeddings · 0.6disparity metrics · 0.6spectral graph matching · 0.4adaptive damping · 0.4joint identification · 0.3view matching · 0.2iterative alignment · 0.2data fusion · 0.2geospatial localization · 0.2GIS integration · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Quantifying Representation Reliability in Self-Supervised Learning ModelsabstractSelf-supervised learning models extract general-purpose representations from data. Quantifying the reliability of these representations is crucial, as many downstream models rely on them as input for their own tasks. To this end, we introduce a formal definition of _representation reliability_: the representation for a given test point is considered to be reliable if the downstream models built on top of that representation can consistently generate accurate predictions for that test point. However, accessing downstream data to quantify the representation reliability is often infeasible or restricted due to privacy concerns. We propose an ensemble-based method for estimating the representation reliability without knowing the downstream tasks a priori. Our method is based on the concept of _neighborhood consistency_ across distinct pre-trained representation spaces. The key insight is to find shared neighboring points as anchors to align these representation spaces before comparing them. We demonstrate through comprehensive numerical experiments that our method effectively captures the representation reliability with a high degree of correlation, achieving robust and favorable performance compared with baseline methods. Young-Jin Park, Shervin Ardeshir, Navid Azizan |
UAI | 3 |
| 2022 | Estimating Structural Disparities for Face ModelsabstractIn machine learning, disparity metrics are often defined by measuring the difference in the performance or outcome of a model, across different sub-populations (groups) of datapoints. Thus, the inputs to disparity quantification consist of a model's predictions y, the ground-truth labels for the predictions y, and group labels g for the data points. Performance of the model for each group is calculated by comparing y and y for the datapoints within a specific group, and as a result, disparity of performance across the different groups can be calculated. In many real world scenarios however, group labels (g) may not be available at scale during training and validation time, or collecting them might not be feasible or desirable as they could often be sensitive information. As a result, evaluating disparity metrics across categorical groups would not be feasible. On the other hand, in many scenarios noisy groupings may be obtainable using some form of a proxy, which would allow measuring disparity metrics across sub-populations. Here we explore performing such analysis on computer vision models trained on human faces, and on tasks such as face attribute prediction and affect estimation. Our experiments indicate that embeddings resulting from an off-the-shelf face recognition model, could meaningfully serve as a proxy for such estimation. Shervin Ardeshir, Cristina Segalin, Nathan Kallus |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2019 | Egocentric Meets Top-ViewabstractThanks to the availability and increasing popularity of wearable devices such as GoPro cameras, smart phones, and glasses, we have access to a plethora of videos captured from first person perspective. Surveillance cameras and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) also offer tremendous amounts of video data recorded from top and oblique view points. Egocentric and surveillance vision have been studied extensively but separately in the computer vision community. The relationship between these two domains, however, remains unexplored. In this study, we make the first attempt in this direction by addressing two basic yet challenging questions. First, having a set of egocentric videos and a top-view surveillance video, does the top-view video contain all or some of the egocentric viewers? In other words, have these videos been shot in the same environment at the same time? Second, if so, can we identify the egocentric viewers in the top-view video? These problems can become extremely challenging when videos are not temporally aligned. Each view, egocentric or top, is modeled by a graph and the assignment and time-delays are computed iteratively using the spectral graph matching framework. We evaluate our method in terms of ranking and assigning egocentric viewers to identities present in the top-view video over a dataset of 50 top-view and 188 egocentric videos captured under different conditions. We also evaluate the capability of our proposed approaches in terms of temporal alignment. The experiments and results demonstrate the capability of the proposed approaches in terms of jointly addressing the temporal alignment and assignment tasks. Shervin Ardeshir, Ali Borji |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2018 | Integrating Egocentric Videos in Top-View Surveillance Videos: Joint Identification and Temporal Alignment
Shervin Ardeshir, Ali Borji |
ECCV (11) | 1 |
| 2018 | An exocentric look at egocentric actions and vice versa
Shervin Ardeshir, Ali Borji |
Comput. Vis. Image Underst. | 1 |
| 2016 | Ego2Top: Matching Viewers in Egocentric and Top-View Videos
Shervin Ardeshir, Ali Borji |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2015 | Geo-semantic segmentationabstractThe availability of GIS (Geographical Information System) databases for many urban areas, provides a valuable source of information for improving the performance of many computer vision tasks. In this paper, we propose a method which leverages information acquired from GIS databases to perform semantic segmentation of the image alongside with geo-referencing each semantic segment with its address and geo-location. First, the image is segmented into a set of initial super-pixels. Then, by projecting the information from GIS databases, a set of priors are obtained about the approximate location of the semantic entities such as buildings and streets in the image plane. However, there are significant inaccuracies (misalignments) in the projections, mainly due to inaccurate GPS-tags and camera parameters. In order to address this misalignment issue, we perform data fusion such that it improves the segmentation and GIS projections accuracy simultaneously with an iterative approach. At each iteration, the projections are evaluated and weighted in terms of reliability, and then fused with the super-pixel segmentations. First segmentation is performed using random walks, based on the GIS projections. Then the global transformation which best aligns the projections to their corresponding semantic entities is computed and applied to the projections to further align them to the content of the image. The iterative approach continues until the projections and segments are well aligned. Shervin Ardeshir, Kofi Malcolm Collins-Sibley, Mubarak Shah |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2014 | GPS-Tag Refinement Using Random Walks with an Adaptive Damping FactorabstractThe number of GPS-tagged images available on the web is increasing at a rapid rate. The majority of such location tags are specified by the users, either through manual tagging or localization-chips embedded in the cameras. However, a known issue with user shared images is the unreliability of such GPS-tags. In this paper, we propose a method for addressing this problem. We assume a large dataset of GPS-tagged images which includes an unknown subset with contaminated tags is available. We develop a robust method for identification and refinement of this subset using the rest of the images in the dataset. In the proposed method, we form a large number of triplets of matching images and use them for estimating the location of the query image utilizing structure from motion. Some of the generated estimations may be inaccurate due to the noisy GPS-tags in the dataset. Therefore, we perform Random Walks on the estimations in order to identify the subset with the maximal agreement. Finally, we estimate the GPS-tag of the query utilizing the identified consistent subset using a weighted mean. We propose a new damping factor for Random Walks which conforms to the level of noise in the input, and consequently, robustifies Random Walks. We evaluated the proposed framework on a dataset of over 18k user-shared images; the experiments show our method robustly improves the accuracy of GPS-tags under diverse scenarios. Amir Zamir, Shervin Ardeshir, Mubarak Shah |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2014 | GIS-Assisted Object Detection and Geospatial Localization
Shervin Ardeshir, Amir Zamir, Alejandro Torroella, Mubarak Shah |
ECCV (6) | 1 |