Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xueshu Zheng
dblp:150/5560
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 4 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Wireless sensing and localization · 57% Internet of things and sensor networks · 43% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless sensing and localization
acoustic source localization |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | DiVA: Distributed Voronoi-based acoustic source localization with wireless sensor networks · INFOCOM 2016 Poster: Distributed Voronoi-based Acoustic Source Localization with Wireless Sensor Networks · MobiCom 2015 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network |
0.3 | 2 | 2016 | Poster: Distributed Voronoi-based Acoustic Source Localization with Wireless Sensor Networks · MobiCom 2015 DiVA: Distributed Voronoi-based acoustic source localization with wireless sensor networks · INFOCOM 2016 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › wireless multimedia sensor networks
acoustic sensor network |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Poster: Distributed Voronoi-based Acoustic Source Localization with Wireless Sensor Networks · MobiCom 2015 |
Wireless sensing and localization › localization algorithms
distributed localization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Poster: Distributed Voronoi-based Acoustic Source Localization with Wireless Sensor Networks · MobiCom 2015 |
Distributed systems
distributed algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Poster: Distributed Voronoi-based Acoustic Source Localization with Wireless Sensor Networks · MobiCom 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
voronoi diagram · 0.4timestamp comparison · 0.4voronoi-based localization · 0.2constrained range-based estimation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | DiVA: Distributed Voronoi-based acoustic source localization with wireless sensor networksabstractThis paper presents DiVA, a novel hybrid range-free and range-based acoustic source localization scheme that uses an ad-hoc network of microphone sensor nodes to produce an accurate estimate of the source's location in the presence of various real-world challenges. DiVA uses range-free pairwise comparisons of sound detection timestamps between local Voronoi neighbors to identify the node closest to the acoustic source, which then estimates the source's location using a constrained range-based method. Through simulation and experimental evaluations, DiVA is shown to be accurate and highly robust, making it practical for real-world applications. Xueshu Zheng, Shuailing Yang, Naigao Jin, Lei Wang 0005, Mathew L. Wymore, Daji Qiao |
INFOCOM | 1 |
| 2015 | A probability-based acoustic source localization scheme using dual-microphone smartphonesabstractThis paper proposes a new acoustic source localization scheme, called Probabilistic Cutting Method (PCM), with randomly deployed smartphones which equipped with known location and direction dual-microphones. Instead of using the value of TDOA (Time Difference Of Arrival), we just use binary information (0/1) and probability to convert the localization problem into plane cutting issues. We can easily come up with the Basic Cutting Method (BCM), but it may appear empty set when error (location error, angle error or error anchors) occurs. PCM can effectively avoid the problem along with lower positioning error. When comparing PCM with TDOA and BCM in different aspects, simulation evaluation results indicate that PCM algorithm achieves highly robustness and accuracy. Sanfeng Zhu, Naigao Jin, Xueshu Zheng, Shuailing Yang, Lei Wang 0005 |
ICC | 3 |
| 2015 | Poster: Distributed Voronoi-based Acoustic Source Localization with Wireless Sensor NetworksabstractThis paper presents DiVA, a new acoustic source localization scheme that uses an ad-hoc network of microphone sensor nodes to produce an accurate estimate of the source's location. DiVA uses pairwise comparisons of sound detection timestamps between local Voronoi neighbors to identify the node closest to the acoustic source and then estimates the source's location. The scheme improves on the state of the art by effectively dealing with anchor nodes' position error, time stamp measurement error and time synchronization error in real world conditions. Through simulation and experimental evaluations, DiVA is shown to be more robust than existing solutions under different error conditions. Xueshu Zheng, Naigao Jin, Lei Wang 0005, Mathew L. Wymore, Daji Qiao |
MobiCom | 1 |
| 2014 | INBS: An Improved Naive Bayes Simple learning approach for accurate indoor localizationabstractIndoor localization based on WiFi signal strength fingerprinting techniques have been attracting many research efforts in past decades. Many localization algorithms have been proposed in order to achieve higher localization accuracy. In this paper, we investigate Bayes learning algorithms and some common-used machine learning algorithms. We identify a general problem of Zero Probability (ZP) which may cause significant decrease of accuracy. In order to solve this problem, we propose an Improved Naive Bayes Simple learning algorithm, namely INBS, based on our data set characteristic. INBS is applicable even though Zero Probability problem occurs. We design experiments based on off-the-shelf WiFi devices, mobile phones and well-known machine learning tool Weka. Our experiments are conducted on a floor covering 560m2in a campus building and a laboratory covering 78m2. Experiment results show that INBS outperforms traditional Naive Bayes and k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) algorithms and two common-used machine learning algorithms in terms of accuracy. Lei Wang 0005, Zhenquan Qin, Xueshu Zheng, Liang Sun 0006, Naigao Jin, Lei Shu 0001 |
ICC | 4 |