Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Russell Seidel

dblp:150/5931 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis
data flow analysis
0.212014
Program analysis for secure big data processing · ASE 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

program transformation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Program analysis for secure big data processing
abstract
The ubiquitous nature of computers is driving a massive increase in the amount of data generated by humans and machines. Two natural consequences of this are the increased efforts to (a) derive meaningful information from accumulated data and (b) ensure that data is not used for unintended purposes. In the direction of analyzing massive amounts of data (a.), tools like MapReduce, Spark, Dryad and higher level scripting languages like Pig Latin and DryadLINQ have significantly improved corresponding tasks for software developers. The second, but equally important aspect of ensuring confidentiality (b.), has seen little support emerge for programmers: while advances in cryptographic techniques allow us to process directly on encrypted data, programmer-friendly and efficient ways of programming such data analysis jobs are still missing. This paper presents novel data flow analyses and program transformations for Pig Latin, that automatically enable the execution of corresponding scripts on encrypted data. We avoid fully homomorphic encryption because of its prohibitively high cost; instead, in some cases, we rely on a minimal set of operations performed by the client. We present the algorithms used for this translation, and empirically demonstrate the practical performance of our approach as well as improvements for programmers in terms of the effort required to preserve data confidentiality.
Julian James Stephen, Savvas Savvides, Russell Seidel, Patrick Eugster
ASE3