Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Osei-Kuffuor
dblp:150/7587
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-6111-6205ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers |
Emerging computing paradigms · 35% High-performance computing · 33% Performance modeling and evaluation · 19% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerging computing paradigms
approximate computing |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Approximate Computing Through the Lens of Uncertainty Quantification · SC 2022 HPAC: evaluating approximate computing techniques on HPC OpenMP applications · SC 2021 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › statistical analysis
sensitivity analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Approximate Computing Through the Lens of Uncertainty Quantification · SC 2022 |
Compilers and program optimization
automatic differentiation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | ADAPT: algorithmic differentiation applied to floating-point precision tuning · SC 2018 |
Compilers and program optimization › approximate computing › precision tuning
floating-point precision tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | ADAPT: algorithmic differentiation applied to floating-point precision tuning · SC 2018 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel algorithms › parallel algorithm design
scalable parallel algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Modeling dilute solutions using first-principles molecular dynamics: computing more than a million atoms with over a million cores · SC 2016 |
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Modeling dilute solutions using first-principles molecular dynamics: computing more than a million atoms with over a million cores · SC 2016 |
High-performance computing › performance optimization
application acceleration |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Approximate Computing Through the Lens of Uncertainty Quantification · SC 2022 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel programming models › directive-based programming
OpenMP |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | HPAC: evaluating approximate computing techniques on HPC OpenMP applications · SC 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
algorithmic differentiation · 0.7uncertainty quantification · 0.6code region ranking · 0.6approximation techniques · 0.5spatial decomposition · 0.2o(n) electronic structure solver · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Approximate Computing Through the Lens of Uncertainty QuantificationabstractAs computer system technology approaches the end of Moore's law, new computing paradigms that improve performance become a necessity. One such paradigm is approximate computing (AC). AC can present significant performance improvements, but a challenge lies in providing confidence that approximations will not overly degrade the application output quality. In AC, application domain experts manually identify code regions amenable to approximation. However, automatically guiding a developer where to apply AC is still a challenge. We propose Puppeteer, a novel method to rank code regions based on amenability to approximation. Puppeteer uses uncertainty quantification methods to measure the sensitivity of application outputs to approximation errors. A developer annotates possible application code regions and Puppeteer estimates the sensitivity of each region. Puppeteer successfully identifies insensitive regions on different benchmarks. We utilize AC on these regions and we obtain speedups of$1.18\times, 1.8\times$, and$1.3\times$for HPCCG. DCT, and BlackScholes, respectively. Konstantinos Parasyris, James Diffenderfer, Harshitha Menon, Ignacio Laguna, Jackson Vanover, Ryan Vogt, Daniel Osei-Kuffuor |
SC | 7 |
| 2021 | HPAC: evaluating approximate computing techniques on HPC OpenMP applicationsabstractAs we approach the limits of Moore's law, researchers are exploring new paradigms for future high-performance computing (HPC) systems. Approximate computing has gained traction by promising to deliver substantial computing power. However, due to the stringent accuracy requirements of HPC scientific applications, the broad adoption of approximate computing methods in HPC requires an in-depth understanding of the application's amenability to approximations. Konstantinos Parasyris, Giorgis Georgakoudis, Harshitha Menon, James Diffenderfer, Ignacio Laguna, Daniel Osei-Kuffuor, Markus Schordan |
SC | 6 |
| 2018 | ADAPT: algorithmic differentiation applied to floating-point precision tuning
Harshitha Menon, Michael O. Lam, Daniel Osei-Kuffuor, Markus Schordan, Kathryn Mohror, Jeffrey A. F. Hittinger |
SC | 3 |
| 2018 | The basic matrix library (BML) for quantum chemistry
Nicolas Bock, Christian F. A. Negre, Susan M. Mniszewski, Jamaludin Mohd-Yusof, Bálint Aradi, Jean-Luc Fattebert, Daniel Osei-Kuffuor, Timothy C. Germann, Anders M. N. Niklasson |
J. Supercomput. | 7 |
| 2016 | Modeling dilute solutions using first-principles molecular dynamics: computing more than a million atoms with over a million coresabstractFirst-Principles Molecular Dynamics (FPMD) methods, although powerful, are notoriously expensive computationally due to the quantum modeling of electrons. Traditional FPMD approaches have typically been limited to a few thousand atoms at most, due to O(N3) or worse solver complexity and the large amount of communication required for highly parallel implementations. Attempts to lower the complexity have often introduced uncontrolled approximations or systematic errors. Using a robust new algorithm, we have developed an O(N) complexity solver for electronic structure problems with fully controllable numerical error. Its minimal use of global communications yields excellent scalability, allowing for very accurate FPMD simulations of more than a million atoms on over a million cores. At these scales, this approach provides multiple orders of magnitude speedup compared to the standard plane-wave approach typically used in condensed matter applications, without sacrificing accuracy. This will open up entire new classes of FPMD simulations, e.g. dilute aqueous solutions. Jean-Luc Fattebert, Daniel Osei-Kuffuor, Erik W. Draeger, Tadashi Ogitsu, William D. Krauss |
SC | 2 |