Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gaopeng Jian
dblp:150/9423
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Authentication and access control · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Authentication and access control
password authentication |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Zipf's Law in Passwords · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2017 |
Authentication and access control › password security
password strength estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Zipf's Law in Passwords · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
zipf's law fitting · 0.6computational statistics · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Zipf's Law in PasswordsabstractDespite three decades of intensive research efforts, it remains an open question as to what is the underlying distribution of user-generated passwords. In this paper, we make a substantial step forward toward understanding this foundational question. By introducing a number of computational statistical techniques and based on 14 large-scale data sets, which consist of 113.3 million real-world passwords, we, for the first time, propose two Zipf-like models (i.e., PDF-Zipf and CDF-Zipf) to characterize the distribution of passwords. More specifically, our PDF-Zipf model can well fit the popular passwords and obtain a coefficient of determination larger than 0.97; our CDF-Zipf model can well fit the entire password data set, with the maximum cumulative distribution function (CDF) deviation between the empirical distribution and the fitted theoretical model being 0.49%~4.59% (on an average 1.85%). With the concrete knowledge of password distributions, we suggest a new metric for measuring the strength of password data sets. Extensive experimental results show the effectiveness and general applicability of the proposed Zipf-like models and security metric. Ding Wang 0002, Haibo Cheng 0001, Ping Wang 0003, Xinyi Huang 0001, Gaopeng Jian |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 5 |