Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

M. Nor Aiza

dblp:151/3880 · also Nor Aiza Moketar · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0001-7767-7798ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements validation
0.212016
An automated collaborative requirements engineering tool for better validation of requirements · ASE 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 An automated collaborative requirements engineering tool for better validation of requirements
abstract
This demo introduces an automated collaborative requirements engineering tool, called TestMEReq, which is used to promote effective communication and collaboration between client-stakeholders and requirements engineers for better requirements validation. Our tool is augmented with real time communication and collaboration support to allow multiple stakeholders to collaboratively validate the same set of requirements. We have conducted a user study focusing on validating requirements using TestMEReq with a few groups of requirements engineers and client stakeholders. The study shows that our automated tool support is able to assist requirements engineers to effectively communicate with client-stakeholders to better validate the requirements virtually in real time. (Demo video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sWLOx-N4Jo).
M. Nor Aiza, Massila Kamalrudin, Safiah Sidek, Mark Robinson, John C. Grundy
ASE1
2014 Automatic Acceptance Test Case Generation From Essential Use Cases
abstract
Requirements validation is a crucial process to determine whether client-stakeholders' needs and expectations of a product are sufficiently correct and complete. Various requirements validation techniques have been used to evaluate the correctness and quality of requirements, but most of these techniques are tedious, expensive and time consuming. Accordingly, most project members are reluctant to invest their time and efforts in the requirements validation process. Moreover, automated tool supports that promote effective collaboration between the client-stakeholders and the engineers are still lacking. In this paper, we describe a novel approach that combines prototyping and test-based requirements techniques to improve the requirements validation process and promote better communication and collaboration between requirements engineers and client-stakeholders. To justify the potential of this prototype tool, we also present three types of evaluation conducted on the prototpye tool, which are the usability survey, 3-tool comparison analysis and expert reviews.
Massila Kamalrudin, M. Nor Aiza, John C. Grundy, John G. Hosking, Mark Robinson
SoMeT2