Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Xiaoxin Xia

dblp:151/5749 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 70% Medical and health informatics · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › omics data analysis
batch effect correction
0.212014
Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.212014
Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
disease subtype discovery
0.212014
Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.212014
Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

surrogate variable analysis · 0.2statistical modeling · 0.2permutation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Preserving biological heterogeneity with a permuted surrogate variable analysis for genomics batch correction
abstract
MOTIVATION: Sample source, procurement process and other technical variations introduce batch effects into genomics data. Algorithms to remove these artifacts enhance differences between known biological covariates, but also carry potential concern of removing intragroup biological heterogeneity and thus any personalized genomic signatures. As a result, accurate identification of novel subtypes from batch-corrected genomics data is challenging using standard algorithms designed to remove batch effects for class comparison analyses. Nor can batch effects be corrected reliably in future applications of genomics-based clinical tests, in which the biological groups are by definition unknown a priori. RESULTS: Therefore, we assess the extent to which various batch correction algorithms remove true biological heterogeneity. We also introduce an algorithm, permuted-SVA (pSVA), using a new statistical model that is blind to biological covariates to correct for technical artifacts while retaining biological heterogeneity in genomic data. This algorithm facilitated accurate subtype identification in head and neck cancer from gene expression data in both formalin-fixed and frozen samples. When applied to predict Human Papillomavirus (HPV) status, pSVA improved cross-study validation even if the sample batches were highly confounded with HPV status in the training set. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All analyses were performed using R version 2.15.0. The code and data used to generate the results of this manuscript is available from https://sourceforge.net/projects/psva.
Hilary S. Parker, Jeffrey T. Leek, Alexander V. Favorov, Michael Considine, Xiaoxin Xia, Sameer Chavan, Christine H. Chung, Elana J. Fertig
Bioinform.5