Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Predrag Filipovikj

dblp:151/5916 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
model checking
0.212016
Simulink to UPPAAL Statistical Model Checker: Analyzing Automotive Industrial Systems · FM 2016
Program verification › model checking
statistical model checking
0.212016
Simulink to UPPAAL Statistical Model Checker: Analyzing Automotive Industrial Systems · FM 2016
Embedded and real-time systems
automotive systems
0.112016
Simulink to UPPAAL Statistical Model Checker: Analyzing Automotive Industrial Systems · FM 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulink · 0.5UPPAAL · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 SIMPPAAL: A Framework for Statistical Model Checking of Industrial Simulink Models
Predrag Filipovikj, Nesredin Mahmud, Cristina Cerschi Seceleanu, Guillermo Rodríguez-Navas, Oscar Ljungkrantz, Henrik Lönn
ISoLA (3)1
2019 Specifying Industrial System Requirements using Specification Patterns: A Case Study of Evaluation with Practitioners
abstract
With the ever-increasing size and complexity of the industrial software systems there is an imperative need for an automated, systematic and exhaustive verification of various software artifacts, s ...
Predrag Filipovikj, Cristina Cerschi Seceleanu
ENASE1
2016 Simulink to UPPAAL Statistical Model Checker: Analyzing Automotive Industrial Systems
Predrag Filipovikj, Nesredin Mahmud, Raluca Marinescu, Cristina Cerschi Seceleanu, Oscar Ljungkrantz, Henrik Lönn
FM1
2014 Reassessing the pattern-based approach for formalizing requirements in the automotive domain
abstract
The importance of using formal methods and techniques for verification of requirements in the automotive industry has been greatly emphasized with the introduction of the new ISO26262 standard for road vehicles functional safety. The lack of support for formal modeling of requirements still represents an obstacle for the adoption of the formal methods in industry. This paper presents a case study that has been conducted in order to evaluate the difficulties inherent to the process of transforming the system requirements from their traditional written form into semi-formal notation. The case study focuses on a set of non-structured functional requirements for the Electrical and Electronic (E/E) systems inside heavy road vehicles, written in natural language, and reassesses the applicability of the extended Specification Pattern System (SPS) represented in a restricted English grammar. Correlating this experience with former studies, we observe that, as previously claimed, the concept of patterns is likely to be generally applicable for the automotive domain. Additionally, we have identified some potential difficulties in the transformation process, which were not reported by the previous studies and will be used as a basis for further research.
Predrag Filipovikj, Mattias Nyberg, Guillermo Rodríguez-Navas
RE1