Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Cedric Yen-Yu Lin

dblp:151/6298 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-4811-4579ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Quantum computing and quantum information · 55% Computational complexity · 21% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 10%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › query complexity
quantum query complexity
0.522017
Sequential measurements, disturbance and property testing · SODA 2017
Upper Bounds on Quantum Query Complexity Inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman Bomb Tester · CCC 2015
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms
0.412019
Quantum SDP Solvers: Large Speed-Ups, Optimality, and Applications to Quantum Learning · ICALP 2019
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum semidefinite programming
0.412019
Quantum SDP Solvers: Large Speed-Ups, Optimality, and Applications to Quantum Learning · ICALP 2019
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum state learning
0.412019
Quantum SDP Solvers: Large Speed-Ups, Optimality, and Applications to Quantum Learning · ICALP 2019
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum state tomography
0.412019
Quantum SDP Solvers: Large Speed-Ups, Optimality, and Applications to Quantum Learning · ICALP 2019
Computational complexity › boolean function complexity
boolean function isomorphism
0.312017
Sequential measurements, disturbance and property testing · SODA 2017
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum property testing
0.312017
Sequential measurements, disturbance and property testing · SODA 2017
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum complexity classes
0.212016
Space-Efficient Error Reduction for Unitary Quantum Computations · ICALP 2016
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum complexity theory
0.212016
Space-Efficient Error Reduction for Unitary Quantum Computations · ICALP 2016
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › matching
bipartite matching
0.212015
Upper Bounds on Quantum Query Complexity Inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman Bomb Tester · CCC 2015
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms
0.212015
Upper Bounds on Quantum Query Complexity Inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman Bomb Tester · CCC 2015
Graph algorithms and graph theory
shortest path
0.212015
Upper Bounds on Quantum Query Complexity Inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman Bomb Tester · CCC 2015
Coding theory
upper bounds
0.212015
Upper Bounds on Quantum Query Complexity Inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman Bomb Tester · CCC 2015
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.112019
Quantum SDP Solvers: Large Speed-Ups, Optimality, and Applications to Quantum Learning · ICALP 2019
Computational complexity › communication complexity › two-party communication
quantum communication complexity
0.112017
Sequential measurements, disturbance and property testing · SODA 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantum principal component analysis · 0.4quantum gibbs state sampler · 0.4quantum OR lemma · 0.4matrix multiplicative weight update · 0.4marriott-watrous amplification · 0.3disturbance test · 0.3space-efficient error reduction · 0.2matchgate computation · 0.2elitzur-vaidman bomb tester · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Quantum SDP Solvers: Large Speed-Ups, Optimality, and Applications to Quantum Learning
abstract
We give two new quantum algorithms for solving semidefinite programs (SDPs) providing quantum speed-ups. We consider SDP instances with m constraint matrices, each of dimension n, rank at most r, and sparsity s. The first algorithm assumes an input model where one is given access to an oracle to the entries of the matrices at unit cost. We show that it has run time O~(s^2 (sqrt{m} epsilon^{-10} + sqrt{n} epsilon^{-12})), with epsilon the error of the solution. This gives an optimal dependence in terms of m, n and quadratic improvement over previous quantum algorithms (when m ~~ n). The second algorithm assumes a fully quantum input model in which the input matrices are given as quantum states. We show that its run time is O~(sqrt{m}+poly(r))*poly(log m,log n,B,epsilon^{-1}), with B an upper bound on the trace-norm of all input matrices. In particular the complexity depends only polylogarithmically in n and polynomially in r. We apply the second SDP solver to learn a good description of a quantum state with respect to a set of measurements: Given m measurements and a supply of copies of an unknown state rho with rank at most r, we show we can find in time sqrt{m}*poly(log m,log n,r,epsilon^{-1}) a description of the state as a quantum circuit preparing a density matrix which has the same expectation values as rho on the m measurements, up to error epsilon. The density matrix obtained is an approximation to the maximum entropy state consistent with the measurement data considered in Jaynes' principle from statistical mechanics. As in previous work, we obtain our algorithm by "quantizing" classical SDP solvers based on the matrix multiplicative weight update method. One of our main technical contributions is a quantum Gibbs state sampler for low-rank Hamiltonians, given quantum states encoding these Hamiltonians, with a poly-logarithmic dependence on its dimension, which is based on ideas developed in quantum principal component analysis. We also develop a "fast" quantum OR lemma with a quadratic improvement in gate complexity over the construction of Harrow et al. [Harrow et al., 2017]. We believe both techniques might be of independent interest.
Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Amir Kalev, Tongyang Li, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Krysta M. Svore, Xiaodi Wu 0001
ICALP4
2018 A Complete Characterization of Unitary Quantum Space
abstract
Motivated by understanding the power of quantum computation with restricted number of qubits, we give two complete characterizations of unitary quantum space bounded computation. First we show that approximating an element of the inverse of a well-conditioned efficiently encoded $2^{k(n)}\times 2^{k(n)}$ matrix is complete for the class of problems solvable by quantum circuits acting on $\mathcal{O}(k(n))$ qubits with all measurements at the end of the computation. Similarly, estimating the minimum eigenvalue of an efficiently encoded Hermitian $2^{k(n)}\times 2^{k(n)}$ matrix is also complete for this class. In the logspace case, our results improve on previous results of Ta-Shma [STOC '13] by giving new space-efficient quantum algorithms that avoid intermediate measurements, as well as showing matching hardness results. Additionally, as a consequence we show that PreciseQMA, the version of QMA with exponentially small completeness-soundess gap, is equal to PSPACE. Thus, the problem of estimating the minimum eigenvalue of a local Hamiltonian to inverse exponential precision is PSPACE-complete, which we show holds even in the frustration-free case. Finally, we can use this characterization to give a provable setting in which the ability to prepare the ground state of a local Hamiltonian is more powerful than the ability to prepare PEPS states. Interestingly, by suitably changing the parameterization of either of these problems we can completely characterize the power of quantum computation with simultaneously bounded time and space.
Bill Fefferman, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin
ITCS2
2017 Sequential measurements, disturbance and property testing
abstract
We describe two procedures which, given access to one copy of a quantum state and a sequence of two-outcome measurements, can distinguish between the case that at least one of the measurements accepts the state with high probability, and the case that all of the measurements have low probability of acceptance. The measurements cannot simply be tried in sequence, because early measurements may disturb the state being tested. One procedure is based on a variant of Marriott-Watrous amplification. The other procedure is based on the use of a test for this disturbance, which is applied with low probability. We find a number of applications: Quantum query complexity separations in the property testing model for testing isomorphism of functions under group actions. We give quantum algorithms for testing isomorphism, linear isomorphism and affine isomorphism of boolean functions which use exponentially fewer queries than is possible classically, and a quantum algorithm for testing graph isomorphism which uses polynomially fewer queries than the best algorithm known. Testing properties of quantum states and operations. We show that any finite property of quantum states can be tested using a number of copies of the state which is logarithmic in the size of the property, and give a test for genuine multipartite entanglement of states of n qubits that uses O(n) copies of the state. We also show that equivalence of two unitary operations under conjugation by a unitary picked from a fixed set can be tested efficiently. This is a natural quantum generalisation of testing isomorphism of boolean functions. Correcting an error in a result of Aaronson on de- Merlinizing quantum protocols. This result claimed that, in any one-way quantum communication protocol where two parties are assisted by an all-powerful but untrusted third party, the third party can be removed with only a modest increase in the communication cost. We give a corrected proof of a key technical lemma required for Aaronson's result.
Aram W. Harrow, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Ashley Montanaro
SODA2
2016 Space-Efficient Error Reduction for Unitary Quantum Computations
abstract
This paper presents a general space-efficient method for error reduction for unitary quantum computation. Consider a polynomial-time quantum computation with completeness c and soundness s, either with or without a witness (corresponding to QMA and BQP, respectively). To convert this computation into a new computation with error at most 2^{-p}, the most space-efficient method known requires extra workspace of O(p*log(1/(c-s))) qubits. This space requirement is too large for scenarios like logarithmic-space quantum computations. This paper shows an errorreduction method for unitary quantum computations (i.e., computations without intermediate measurements) that requires extra workspace of just O(log(p/(c-s))) qubits. This in particular gives the first method of strong amplification for logarithmic-space unitary quantum computations with two-sided bounded error. This also leads to a number of consequences in complexity theory, such as the uselessness of quantum witnesses in bounded-error logarithmic-space unitary quantum computations, the PSPACE upper bound for QMA with exponentially-small completeness-soundness gap, and strong amplification for matchgate computations.
Bill Fefferman, Hirotada Kobayashi, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Tomoyuki Morimae, Harumichi Nishimura
ICALP3
2015 Upper Bounds on Quantum Query Complexity Inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman Bomb Tester
abstract
Inspired by the Elitzur-Vaidman bomb testing problem [arXiv:hep-th/9305002], we introduce a new query complexity model, which we call bomb query complexity $B(f)$. We investigate its relationship with the usual quantum query complexity $Q(f)$, and show that $B(f)=Θ(Q(f)^2)$. This result gives a new method to upper bound the quantum query complexity: we give a method of finding bomb query algorithms from classical algorithms, which then provide nonconstructive upper bounds on $Q(f)=Θ(\sqrt{B(f)})$. We subsequently were able to give explicit quantum algorithms matching our upper bound method. We apply this method on the single-source shortest paths problem on unweighted graphs, obtaining an algorithm with $O(n^{1.5})$ quantum query complexity, improving the best known algorithm of $O(n^{1.5}\sqrt{\log n})$ [arXiv:quant-ph/0606127]. Applying this method to the maximum bipartite matching problem gives an $O(n^{1.75})$ algorithm, improving the best known trivial $O(n^2)$ upper bound.
Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Han-Hsuan Lin
CCC1