Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lena Dankin

dblp:151/8447 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Language models and text generation · 42% Information extraction and text analysis · 36% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Machine learning and data management · 77% Information retrieval · 23%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
argument mining
0.822020
Corpus Wide Argument Mining - A Working Solution · AAAI 2020
A Dataset of General-Purpose Rebuttal · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
cold-start
0.612022
Cluster & Tune: Boost Cold Start Performance in Text Classification · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
continual pre-training
0.612022
Fortunately, Discourse Markers Can Enhance Language Models for Sentiment Analysis · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training
0.612022
Fortunately, Discourse Markers Can Enhance Language Models for Sentiment Analysis · AAAI 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.612022
Fortunately, Discourse Markers Can Enhance Language Models for Sentiment Analysis · AAAI 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.612022
Cluster & Tune: Boost Cold Start Performance in Text Classification · ACL (1) 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
BERT
0.412020
Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.412020
Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study · EMNLP (1) 2020
Machine learning and data management
active learning
0.412020
Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study · EMNLP (1) 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
argumentation
0.412019
Are You Convinced? Choosing the More Convincing Evidence with a Siamese Network · ACL (1) 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › argumentation
argument convincingness
0.412019
Are You Convinced? Choosing the More Convincing Evidence with a Siamese Network · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › argument generation
rebuttal generation
0.412019
A Dataset of General-Purpose Rebuttal · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Information retrieval
search engines
0.112020
Corpus Wide Argument Mining - A Working Solution · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.112019
A Dataset of General-Purpose Rebuttal · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sentence-level indexing · 0.9iterative annotation · 0.9empirical study · 0.9active learning · 0.9weak supervision · 0.6inter-training · 0.6hyperparameter tuning · 0.6discourse markers · 0.6clustering · 0.6siamese neural network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Fortunately, Discourse Markers Can Enhance Language Models for Sentiment Analysis
abstract
In recent years, pretrained language models have revolutionized the NLP world, while achieving state of the art performance in various downstream tasks. However, in many cases, these models do not perform well when labeled data is scarce and the model is expected to perform in the zero or few shot setting. Recently, several works have shown that continual pretraining or performing a second phase of pretraining (inter-training) which is better aligned with the downstream task, can lead to improved results, especially in the scarce data setting. Here, we propose to leverage sentiment-carrying discourse markers to generate large-scale weakly-labeled data, which in turn can be used to adapt language models for sentiment analysis. Extensive experimental results show the value of our approach on various benchmark datasets, including the finance domain. Code, models and data are available at https://github.com/ibm/tslm-discourse-markers.
Liat Ein-Dor, Ilya Shnayderman, Artem Spector, Lena Dankin, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim
AAAI4
2022 Cluster & Tune: Boost Cold Start Performance in Text Classification
abstract
Eyal Shnarch, Ariel Gera, Alon Halfon, Lena Dankin, Leshem Choshen, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022.
Eyal Shnarch, Ariel Gera, Alon Halfon, Lena Dankin, Leshem Choshen, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim
ACL (1)4
2020 Corpus Wide Argument Mining - A Working Solution
abstract
One of the main tasks in argument mining is the retrieval of argumentative content pertaining to a given topic. Most previous work addressed this task by retrieving a relatively small number of relevant documents as the initial source for such content. This line of research yielded moderate success, which is of limited use in a real-world system. Furthermore, for such a system to yield a comprehensive set of relevant arguments, over a wide range of topics, it requires leveraging a large and diverse corpus in an appropriate manner. Here we present a first end-to-end high-precision, corpus-wide argument mining system. This is made possible by combining sentence-level queries over an appropriate indexing of a very large corpus of newspaper articles, with an iterative annotation scheme. This scheme addresses the inherent label bias in the data and pinpoints the regions of the sample space whose manual labeling is required to obtain high-precision among top-ranked candidates.
Liat Ein-Dor, Eyal Shnarch, Lena Dankin, Alon Halfon, Benjamin Sznajder, Ariel Gera, Carlos Alzate, Martin Gleize, Leshem Choshen, Yufang Hou 0001, Yonatan Bilu, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim
AAAI3
2020 Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study
abstract
Liat Ein-Dor, Alon Halfon, Ariel Gera, Eyal Shnarch, Lena Dankin, Leshem Choshen, Marina Danilevsky, Ranit Aharonov, Yoav Katz, Noam Slonim. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020.
Liat Ein-Dor, Alon Halfon, Ariel Gera, Eyal Shnarch, Lena Dankin, Leshem Choshen, Marina Danilevsky, Ranit Aharonov, Yoav Katz, Noam Slonim
EMNLP (1)5
2019 Are You Convinced? Choosing the More Convincing Evidence with a Siamese Network
abstract
Machines capable of responding and interacting with humans in helpful ways have become ubiquitous.We now expect them to discuss with us the more delicate questions in our world, and they should do so armed with effective arguments.But what makes an argument more persuasive?What will convince you?In this paper, we present a new data set, IBM-EviConv, of pairs of evidence labeled for convincingness, designed to be more challenging than existing alternatives.We also propose a Siamese neural network architecture shown to outperform several baselines on both a prior convincingness data set and our own.Finally, we provide insights into our experimental results and the various kinds of argumentative value our method is capable of detecting.
Martin Gleize, Eyal Shnarch, Leshem Choshen, Lena Dankin, Guy Moshkowich, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim
ACL (1)4
2019 A Dataset of General-Purpose Rebuttal
abstract
Matan Orbach, Yonatan Bilu, Ariel Gera, Yoav Kantor, Lena Dankin, Tamar Lavee, Lili Kotlerman, Shachar Mirkin, Michal Jacovi, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Matan Orbach, Yonatan Bilu, Ariel Gera, Yoav Kantor, Lena Dankin, Tamar Lavee, Lili Kotlerman, Shachar Mirkin, Michal Jacovi, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)5
2016 Stemming and Segmentation for Classical Tibetan
Orna Almogi, Lena Dankin, Nachum Dershowitz, Yair Hoffman, Dimitri Pauls, Dorji Wangchuk, Lior Wolf
CICLing (1)2
2015 Show Me Your Evidence - an Automatic Method for Context Dependent Evidence Detection
abstract
Engaging in a debate with oneself or others to take decisions is an integral part of our day-today life.A debate on a topic (say, use of performance enhancing drugs) typically proceeds by one party making an assertion/claim (say, PEDs are bad for health) and then providing an evidence to support the claim (say, a 2006 study shows that PEDs have psychiatric side effects).In this work, we propose the task of automatically detecting such evidences from unstructured text that support a given claim.This task has many practical applications in decision support and persuasion enhancement in a wide range of domains.We first introduce an extensive benchmark data set tailored for this task, which allows training statistical models and assessing their performance.Then, we suggest a system architecture based on supervised learning to address the evidence detection task.Finally, promising experimental results are reported.
Ruty Rinott, Lena Dankin, Carlos Alzate, Mitesh M. Khapra, Ehud Aharoni, Noam Slonim
EMNLP2