Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Latypov

dblp:151/9423 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 87% Multi-agent systems · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
collision avoidance
0.212014
Reciprocally-Rotating Velocity Obstacles · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › collision avoidance
reciprocal collision avoidance
0.212014
Reciprocally-Rotating Velocity Obstacles · ICRA 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent control
multi-agent navigation
0.112014
Reciprocally-Rotating Velocity Obstacles · ICRA 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

velocity obstacle · 0.2optimal reciprocal collision avoidance · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Reciprocally-Rotating Velocity Obstacles
abstract
Modern multi-agent systems frequently use highlevel planners to extract basic paths for agents, and then rely on local collision avoidance to ensure that the agents reach their destinations without colliding with one another or dynamic obstacles. One state-of-the-art local collision avoidance technique is Optimal Reciprocal Collision Avoidance (ORCA). Despite being fast and efficient for circular-shaped agents, ORCA may deadlock when polygonal shapes are used. To address this shortcoming, we introduce Reciprocally-Rotating Velocity Obstacles (RRVO). RRVO generalizes ORCA by introducing a notion of rotation for polygonally-shaped agents. This generalization permits more realistic motion than ORCA and does not suffer from as much deadlock. In this paper, we present the theory of RRVO and show empirically that it does not suffer from the deadlock issue ORCA has, permits agents to reach goals faster, and has a comparable collision rate at the cost of performance overhead quadratic in the (typically small) user-defined parameter δ.
Andrew Giese, Daniel Latypov, Nancy M. Amato
ICRA2