Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Latypov
dblp:151/9423
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 87% Multi-agent systems · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
collision avoidance |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Reciprocally-Rotating Velocity Obstacles · ICRA 2014 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › collision avoidance
reciprocal collision avoidance |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Reciprocally-Rotating Velocity Obstacles · ICRA 2014 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent control
multi-agent navigation |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Reciprocally-Rotating Velocity Obstacles · ICRA 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
velocity obstacle · 0.2optimal reciprocal collision avoidance · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Reciprocally-Rotating Velocity ObstaclesabstractModern multi-agent systems frequently use highlevel planners to extract basic paths for agents, and then rely on local collision avoidance to ensure that the agents reach their destinations without colliding with one another or dynamic obstacles. One state-of-the-art local collision avoidance technique is Optimal Reciprocal Collision Avoidance (ORCA). Despite being fast and efficient for circular-shaped agents, ORCA may deadlock when polygonal shapes are used. To address this shortcoming, we introduce Reciprocally-Rotating Velocity Obstacles (RRVO). RRVO generalizes ORCA by introducing a notion of rotation for polygonally-shaped agents. This generalization permits more realistic motion than ORCA and does not suffer from as much deadlock. In this paper, we present the theory of RRVO and show empirically that it does not suffer from the deadlock issue ORCA has, permits agents to reach goals faster, and has a comparable collision rate at the cost of performance overhead quadratic in the (typically small) user-defined parameter δ. Andrew Giese, Daniel Latypov, Nancy M. Amato |
ICRA | 2 |