EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Burlen Loring
dblp:152/0203
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-4678-8142ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 87% Performance modeling and evaluation · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
High-performance computing › scientific data analysis
in-situ analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Performance analysis, design considerations, and applications of extreme-scale in situ infrastructures · SC 2016 |
High-performance computing › scientific visualization
in situ visualization and analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Performance analysis, design considerations, and applications of extreme-scale in situ infrastructures · SC 2016 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Performance analysis, design considerations, and applications of extreme-scale in situ infrastructuresabstractA key trend facing extreme-scale computational science is the widening gap between computational and I/O rates, and the challenge that follows is how to best gain insight from simulation data when it is increasingly impractical to save it to persistent storage for subsequent visual exploration and analysis. One approach to this challenge is centered around the idea of in situ processing, where visualization and analysis processing is performed while data is still resident in memory. This paper examines several key design and performance issues related to the idea of in situ processing at extreme scale on modern platforms: scalability, overhead, performance measurement and analysis, comparison and contrast with a traditional post hoc approach, and interfacing with simulation codes. We illustrate these principles in practice with studies, conducted on large-scale HPC platforms, that include a miniapplication and multiple science application codes, one of which demonstrates in situ methods in use at greater than 1M-way concurrency. Utkarsh Ayachit, Andrew C. Bauer, Earl P. N. Duque, Greg Eisenhauer, Nicola J. Ferrier, Junmin Gu, Kenneth E. Jansen, Burlen Loring, Zarija Lukic, Suresh Menon, Dmitriy Morozov, Patrick O'Leary, Reetesh Ranjan, Michel E. Rasquin, Christopher P. Stone, Venkatram Vishwanath, Gunther H. Weber, Brad Whitlock, Matthew Wolf, Kesheng Wu, E. Wes Bethel |
SC | 8 |
| 2014 | Structure recognition from high resolution images of ceramic compositesabstractFibers provide exceptional strength-to-weight ratio capabilities when woven into ceramic composites, transforming them into materials with exceptional resistance to high temperature, and high strength combined with improved fracture toughness. Microcracks are inevitable when the material is under strain, which can be imaged using synchrotron X-ray computed micro-tomography (μ-CT) for assessment of material mechanical toughness variation. An important part of this analysis is to recognize fibrillar features. This paper presents algorithms for detecting and quantifying composite cracks and fiber breaks from high-resolution image stacks. First, we propose recognition algorithms to identify the different structures of the composite, including matrix cracks and fibers breaks. Second, we introduce our package F3D for fast filtering of large 3D imagery, implemented in OpenCL to take advantage of graphic cards. Results show that our algorithms automatically identify micro-damage and that the GPU-based implementation introduced here takes minutes, being 17x faster than similar tools on a typical image file. Daniela Ushizima, Talita Perciano, Harinarayan Krishnan, Burlen Loring, Hrishikesh Bale, Dilworth Parkinson, James A. Sethian |
IEEE BigData | 4 |