Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Renyu Zhang 0001
dblp:152/4749-1 · also Renyu (Philip) Zhang
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0284-164XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50% Approximation and online algorithms · 50% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Nonprogressive Diffusion on Social Networks: Approximation and Applications · EC 2024 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis
network diffusion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Nonprogressive Diffusion on Social Networks: Approximation and Applications · EC 2024 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
causal inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Learning Based Causal Inference for Large-Scale Combinatorial Experiments: Theory and Empirical Evidence · EC 2023 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › causal inference
treatment effect estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Learning Based Causal Inference for Large-Scale Combinatorial Experiments: Theory and Empirical Evidence · EC 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neyman orthogonality · 1.3double machine learning · 1.3deep learning · 1.3microfounded diffusion · 0.8macroscopic diffusion · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Nonprogressive Diffusion on Social Networks: Approximation and ApplicationsabstractNonprogressive diffusion describes the spread of behavior on a social network, where agents are allowed to reverse their decisions as time evolves. It has a wide variety of applications in service adoption, opinion formation, epidemiology, etc. Two common approaches to analyzing network diffusion are: microfounded methods, which capture the detailed network topology and the stochastic evolution of agent states but often lead to computational challenges, and macroscopic methods, which simplify the diffusion process. Yunduan Lin, Heng Zhang 0008, Renyu Zhang 0001, Zuo-Jun Max Shen |
EC | 3 |
| 2023 | Deep Learning Based Causal Inference for Large-Scale Combinatorial Experiments: Theory and Empirical EvidenceabstractLarge-scale online platforms launch hundreds of randomized experiments (a.k.a. A/B tests) every day to iterate their operations and marketing strategies, while the combinations of these treatments are typically not exhaustively tested. It triggers an important question of both academic and practical interests: Without observing the outcomes of all treatment combinations, how to estimate the causal effect of any treatment combination and identify the optimal treatment combination? We develop a novel framework combining deep learning and double machine learning to estimate the causal effect of any treatment combination for each user on the platform when observing only a small subset of treatment combinations. Our proposed framework (called debiased deep learning, DeDL) exploits Neyman orthogonality and combines interpretable and flexible structural layers in deep learning. We prove theoretically that this framework yields consistent and asymptotically normal estimators under mild assumptions, thus allowing for identifying the best treatment combination when only observing a few combinations. To empirically validate our method, we then collaborate with a large-scale video-sharing platform and implement our framework for three experiments involving three treatments where each combination of treatments is tested. When only observing a subset of treatment combinations, our DeDL approach significantly outperforms other benchmarks to accurately estimate and infer the average treatment effect (ATE) of any treatment combination and to identify the optimal treatment combination. Zikun Ye, Dennis J. Zhang, Heng Zhang 0008, Renyu Zhang 0001 |
EC | 5 |