Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Osama Al-Baik

dblp:152/5981 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-5583-0453ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Empirical software engineering · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
software process improvement
0.412019
Integrative Double Kaizen Loop (IDKL): Towards a Culture of Continuous Learning and Sustainable Improvements for Software Organizations · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2019
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.112019
Integrative Double Kaizen Loop (IDKL): Towards a Culture of Continuous Learning and Sustainable Improvements for Software Organizations · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lean · 0.4kaizen · 0.4ethnographic action research · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Integrative Double Kaizen Loop (IDKL): Towards a Culture of Continuous Learning and Sustainable Improvements for Software Organizations
abstract
In the past decades, software organizations have been relying on implementing process improvement methods to advance quality, productivity, and predictability of their development and maintenance efforts. However, these methods have proven to be challenging to implement in many situations, and when implemented, their benefits are often not sustained. Commonly, the workforce requires guidance during the initial deployment, but what happens after the guidance stops? Why do not traditional improvement methods deliver the desired results? And, how do we maintain the improvements when they are realized? In response to these questions, we have combined social and organizational learning methods with Lean's continuous improvement philosophy, Kaizen, which has resulted in an IDKL model that has successfully promoted continuous learning and improvement. The IDKL has evolved through a real-life project with an industrial partner; the study employed ethnographic action research with 231 participants and had lasted for almost 3 years. The IDKL requires employees to continuously apply small improvements to the daily routines of the work-procedures. The small improvements by themselves are unobtrusive. However, the IDKL has helped the industrial partner to implant continuous improvement as a daily habit. This has led to realizing sustainable and noticeable improvements. The findings show that on average, Lead Time has dropped by 46 percent, Process Cycle Efficiency has increased by 137 percent, First-Pass Process Yield has increased by 27 percent, and Customer Satisfaction has increased by 25 percent.
Osama Al-Baik, James Miller 0001
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
2015 The kanban approach, between agility and leanness: a systematic review
Osama Al-Baik, James Miller 0001
Empir. Softw. Eng.1
2014 Waste identification and elimination in information technology organizations
Osama Al-Baik, James Miller 0001
Empir. Softw. Eng.1