Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Megan Orr
dblp:152/7491
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | An improved method for computing q-values when the distribution of effect sizes is asymmetric · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | An improved method for computing q-values when the distribution of effect sizes is asymmetric · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | An improved method for computing q-values when the distribution of effect sizes is asymmetric · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
q-value · 0.2multiple testing · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | An improved method for computing q-values when the distribution of effect sizes is asymmetricabstractMOTIVATION: Asymmetry is frequently observed in the empirical distribution of test statistics that results from the analysis of gene expression experiments. This asymmetry indicates an asymmetry in the distribution of effect sizes. A common method for identifying differentially expressed (DE) genes in a gene expression experiment while controlling false discovery rate (FDR) is Storey's q-value method. This method ranks genes based solely on the P-values from each gene in the experiment. RESULTS: We propose a method that alters and improves upon the q-value method by taking the sign of the test statistics, in addition to the P-values, into account. Through two simulation studies (one involving independent normal data and one involving microarray data), we show that the proposed method, when compared with the traditional q-value method, generally provides a better ranking for genes as well as a higher number of truly DE genes declared to be DE, while still adequately controlling FDR. We illustrate the proposed method by analyzing two microarray datasets, one from an experiment of thale cress seedlings and the other from an experiment of maize leaves. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R code and data files for the proposed method and examples are available at Bioinformatics online. Megan Orr, Peng Liu 0012, Dan Nettleton |
Bioinform. | 1 |