Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sean Mason

dblp:153/1961 · also Sean A. Mason · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 42% Legged, aerial and field robots · 30% Robot navigation and mapping · 14%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.422018
An MPC Walking Framework with External Contact Forces · ICRA 2018
Inertial sensor-based humanoid joint state estimation · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.312018
An MPC Walking Framework with External Contact Forces · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
walking control
0.312018
An MPC Walking Framework with External Contact Forces · ICRA 2018
Computer vision › 3D vision
joint state estimation
0.212016
Inertial sensor-based humanoid joint state estimation · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation
0.212016
Inertial sensor-based humanoid joint state estimation · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
bipedal walking
0.112018
An MPC Walking Framework with External Contact Forces · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion
0.112018
An MPC Walking Framework with External Contact Forces · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quadratic programming · 0.3model predictive control · 0.3mixed-integer quadratic programming · 0.3kalman filtering · 0.2inertial measurement unit · 0.2calibration · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 An MPC Walking Framework with External Contact Forces
abstract
In this work, we present an extension to a linear Model Predictive Control (MPC) scheme that plans external contact forces for the robot when given multiple contact locations and their corresponding friction cone. To this end, we set up a two-step optimization problem. In the first optimization, we compute the Center of Mass (CoM) trajectory, foot step locations, and introduce slack variables to account for violating the imposed constraints on the Zero Moment Point (ZMP). We then use the slack variables to trigger the second optimization, in which we calculate the optimal external force that compensates for the ZMP tracking error. This optimization considers multiple contacts positions within the environment by formulating the problem as a Mixed Integer Quadratic Program (MIQP) that can be solved at a speed between 100-300 Hz. Once contact is created, the MIQP reduces to a single Quadratic Program (QP) that can be solved in real-time (<; 1kHz). Simulations show that the presented walking control scheme can withstand disturbances 2-3× larger with the additional force provided by a hand contact.
Sean Mason, Nicholas Rotella, Stefan Schaal, Ludovic Righetti
ICRA1
2016 Inertial sensor-based humanoid joint state estimation
abstract
This work presents methods for the determination of a humanoid robot's joint velocities and accelerations directly from link-mounted Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) each containing a three-axis gyroscope and a three-axis accelerometer. No information about the global pose of the floating base or its links is required and precise knowledge of the link IMU poses is not necessary due to presented calibration routines. Additionally, a filter is introduced to fuse gyroscope angular velocities with joint position measurements and compensate the computed joint velocities for time-varying gyroscope biases. The resulting joint velocities are subject to less noise and delay than filtered velocities computed from numerical differentiation of joint potentiometer signals, leading to superior performance in joint feedback control as demonstrated in experiments performed on a SARCOS hydraulic humanoid.
Nicholas Rotella, Sean Mason, Stefan Schaal, Ludovic Righetti
ICRA2