EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiahui Li 0003
dblp:153/2952-3
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
7as first author
10since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 6 first-author · 9 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 49% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% Vision and language · 11% |
Topics — the 28 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
2.3 | 4 | 2023 | Two Heads are Better Than One: A Simple Exploration Framework for Efficient Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023 S2RL: Do We Really Need to Perceive All States in Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning? · KDD 2022 Deconfounded Value Decomposition for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | RED: Unleashing Token-Level Rewards from Holistic Feedback via Reward Redistribution · EMNLP 2025 Optimizing Language Models with Fair and Stable Reward Composition in Reinforcement Learning · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
credit assignment |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Deconfounded Value Decomposition for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2022 Shapley Counterfactual Credits for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · KDD 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Relation-R1: Progressively Cognitive Chain-of-Thought Guided Reinforcement Learning for Unified Relation Comprehension · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
group relative policy optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Relation-R1: Progressively Cognitive Chain-of-Thought Guided Reinforcement Learning for Unified Relation Comprehension · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Relation-R1: Progressively Cognitive Chain-of-Thought Guided Reinforcement Learning for Unified Relation Comprehension · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Relation-R1: Progressively Cognitive Chain-of-Thought Guided Reinforcement Learning for Unified Relation Comprehension · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual relationship understanding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Relation-R1: Progressively Cognitive Chain-of-Thought Guided Reinforcement Learning for Unified Relation Comprehension · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RED: Unleashing Token-Level Rewards from Holistic Feedback via Reward Redistribution · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Causal Transition Matrix for Instance-dependent Label Noise · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Better Alignment: Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning Against Sparse Rewards · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
instance-dependent label noise |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Causal Transition Matrix for Instance-dependent Label Noise · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Causal Transition Matrix for Instance-dependent Label Noise · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design › reward shaping
reward redistribution |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RED: Unleashing Token-Level Rewards from Holistic Feedback via Reward Redistribution · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimizing Language Models with Fair and Stable Reward Composition in Reinforcement Learning · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration › intrinsic motivation
curiosity-driven exploration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Two Heads are Better Than One: A Simple Exploration Framework for Efficient Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
intrinsic motivation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Two Heads are Better Than One: A Simple Exploration Framework for Efficient Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | S2RL: Do We Really Need to Perceive All States in Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning? · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning › decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning
decentralized policy learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | S2RL: Do We Really Need to Perceive All States in Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning? · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
sparse attention |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | S2RL: Do We Really Need to Perceive All States in Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning? · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning › value-based multi-agent reinforcement learning
value decomposition |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Deconfounded Value Decomposition for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
concept-based explanation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Instance-wise or Class-wise? A Tale of Neighbor Shapley for Concept-based Explanation · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Instance-wise or Class-wise? A Tale of Neighbor Shapley for Concept-based Explanation · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › shapley value
shapley value explanation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Instance-wise or Class-wise? A Tale of Neighbor Shapley for Concept-based Explanation · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Learning Causal Transition Matrix for Instance-dependent Label Noise · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Deconfounded Value Decomposition for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
confounding bias |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Deconfounded Value Decomposition for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Shapley Counterfactual Credits for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · KDD 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 1.0shapley value · 1.0multi-reward optimization · 1.0chain-of-thought · 1.0GRPO · 1.0transition matrix estimation · 0.9policy optimization · 0.9causal graph · 0.9branch-based sampling · 0.9backward progressive training · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Relation-R1: Progressively Cognitive Chain-of-Thought Guided Reinforcement Learning for Unified Relation ComprehensionabstractRecent advances in multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have significantly improved object-level grounding and region captioning. However, they remain limited in visual relation understanding, struggling even with binary relation detection, let alone N-ary relations involving multiple semantic roles. The core reason is the lack of modeling for structural semantic dependencies among multi-entities, leading to over-reliance on language priors (e.g., defaulting to "person drinks a milk" if a person is merely holding it). To this end, we propose Relation-R1, the first unified relation comprehension framework that explicitly integrates cognitive chain-of-thought (CoT)-guided supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and group relative policy optimization (GRPO) within a reinforcement learning (RL) paradigm. Specifically, we first establish foundational reasoning capabilities via SFT, enforcing structured outputs with thinking processes. Then, GRPO is utilized to refine these outputs via multi-rewards optimization, prioritizing visual-semantic grounding over language-induced biases, thereby improving generalization capability. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of various CoT strategies within this framework, demonstrating that a specific-to-general progressive approach in CoT guidance further improves generalization, especially in capturing synonymous N-ary relations. Extensive experiments on widely-used PSG and SWiG datasets demonstrate that Relation-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance in both binary and N-ary relation understanding. Lin Li 0065, Wei Chen 0070, Jiahui Li 0003, Kwang-Ting Cheng, Long Chen 0016 |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | Learning Causal Transition Matrix for Instance-dependent Label NoiseabstractNoisy labels are both inevitable and problematic in machine learning methods, as they negatively impact models' generalization ability by causing overfitting. In the context of learning with noise, the transition matrix plays a crucial role in the design of statistically consistent algorithms. However, the transition matrix is often considered unidentifiable. One strand of methods typically addresses this problem by assuming that the transition matrix is instance-independent; that is, the probability of mislabeling a particular instance is not influenced by its characteristics or attributes. This assumption is clearly invalid in complex real-world scenarios. To better understand the transition relationship and relax this assumption, we propose to study the data generation process of noisy labels from a causal perspective. We discover that an unobservable latent variable can affect either the instance itself, the label annotation procedure, or both, which complicates the identification of the transition matrix. To address various scenarios, we have unified these observations within a new causal graph. In this graph, the input instance is divided into a noise-resistant component and a noise-sensitive component based on whether they are affected by the latent variable. These two components contribute to identifying the “causal transition matrix”, which approximates the true transition matrix with theoretical guarantee. In line with this, we have designed a novel training framework that explicitly models this causal relationship and, as a result, achieves a more accurate model for inferring the clean label. Jiahui Li 0003, Tai-Wei Chang, Kun Kuang 0001, Long Chen 0016, Jun Zhou 0011 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Towards Better Alignment: Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning Against Sparse RewardsabstractDiffusion models have achieved remarkable success in text-to-image generation. However, their practical applications are hindered by the misalignment between generated images and corresponding text prompts. To tackle this issue, reinforcement learning (RL) has been considered for diffusion model fine-tuning. Yet, RL’s effectiveness is limited by the challenge of sparse reward, where feedback is only available at the end of the generation process. This makes it difficult to identify which actions during the de-noising process contribute positively to the final generated image, potentially leading to ineffective or unnecessary de-noising policies. To this end, this paper presents a novel RL-based framework that addresses the sparse reward problem when training diffusion models. Our framework, named B2-DiffuRL, employs two strategies: Backward progressive training and Branch-based sampling. For one thing, backward progressive training focuses initially on the final timesteps of denoising process and gradually extends the training interval to earlier timesteps, easing the learning difficulty from sparse rewards. For another, we perform branch-based sampling for each training interval. By comparing the samples within the same branch, we can identify how much the policies of the current training interval contribute to the final image, which helps to learn effective policies instead of unnecessary ones. B2-DiffuRL is compatible with existing optimization algorithms. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of B2-DiffuRL in improving prompt-image alignment and maintaining diversity in generated images. The code for this work is available1. Zijing Hu, Fengda Zhang, Long Chen 0016, Kun Kuang 0001, Jiahui Li 0003, Kaifeng Gao, Jun Xiao 0001, Xin Wang 0019, Wenwu Zhu 0001 |
CVPR | 5 |
| 2025 | RED: Unleashing Token-Level Rewards from Holistic Feedback via Reward RedistributionabstractReinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) offers a promising approach to aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.Typically, a reward model is trained or supplied to act as a proxy for humans in evaluating generated responses during the reinforcement training phase.However, current reward models operate as sequence-to-one models, allocating a single, sparse, and delayed reward to an entire output sequence.This approach may overlook the significant contributions of individual tokens toward the desired outcome.To this end, we propose a more finegrained, token-level guidance approach for RL training.Specifically, we introduce RED, a novel REward reDistribition method that evaluates and assigns specific credit to each token using an off-the-shelf reward model.Utilizing these fine-grained rewards enhances the model's understanding of language nuances, leading to more precise performance improvements.Notably, our method does not require modifying the reward model or introducing additional training steps, thereby incurring minimal computational costs.Experimental results across diverse datasets and tasks demonstrate the superiority of our approach. Jiahui Li 0003, Lin Li 0065, Tai-Wei Chang, Kun Kuang 0001, Long Chen 0016, Jun Zhou 0011, Cheng Yang 0002 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2024 | Optimizing Language Models with Fair and Stable Reward Composition in Reinforcement LearningabstractReinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and AI-generated feedback (RLAIF) have become prominent techniques that significantly enhance the functionality of pre-trained language models (LMs).These methods harness feedback, sourced either from humans or AI, as direct rewards or to shape reward models that steer LM optimization.Nonetheless, the effective integration of rewards from diverse sources presents a significant challenge due to their disparate characteristics.To address this, recent research has developed algorithms incorporating strategies such as weighting, ranking, and constraining to handle this complexity.Despite these innovations, a bias toward disproportionately high rewards can still skew the reinforcement learning process and negatively impact LM performance.This paper explores a methodology for reward composition that enables simultaneous improvements in LMs across multiple dimensions.Inspired by fairness theory, we introduce a training algorithm that aims to reduce Disparity and enhance Stability among various rewards.Our method treats the aggregate reward as a dynamic weighted sum of individual rewards, with alternating updates to the weights and model parameters.For efficient and straightforward implementation, we employ an estimation technique rooted in the mirror descent method for weight updates, eliminating the need for gradient computations.The empirical results under various types of rewards across a wide range of scenarios demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Jiahui Li 0003, Fengda Zhang, Tai-Wei Chang, Kun Kuang 0001, Long Chen 0016, Jun Zhou 0011 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | Two Heads are Better Than One: A Simple Exploration Framework for Efficient Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningabstractExploration strategy plays an important role in reinforcement learning, especially in sparse-reward tasks. In cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning~(MARL), designing a suitable exploration strategy is much more challenging due to the large state space and the complex interaction among agents. Currently, mainstream exploration methods in MARL either contribute to exploring the unfamiliar states which are large and sparse, or measuring the interaction among agents with high computational costs. We found an interesting phenomenon that different kinds of exploration plays a different role in different MARL scenarios, and choosing a suitable one is often more effective than designing an exquisite algorithm. In this paper, we propose a exploration method that incorporate the \underline{C}uri\underline{O}sity-based and \underline{IN}fluence-based exploration~(COIN) which is simple but effective in various situations. First, COIN measures the influence of each agent on the other agents based on mutual information theory and designs it as intrinsic rewards which are applied to each individual value function. Moreover, COIN computes the curiosity-based intrinsic rewards via prediction errors which are added to the extrinsic reward. For integrating the two kinds of intrinsic rewards, COIN utilizes a novel framework in which they complement each other and lead to a sufficient and effective exploration on cooperative MARL tasks. We perform extensive experiments on different challenging benchmarks, and results across different scenarios show the superiority of our method. Jiahui Li 0003, Kun Kuang 0001, Baoxiang Wang 0001, Fei Wu 0001, Jun Xiao 0001, Long Chen 0016 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Deconfounded Value Decomposition for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningabstractValue decomposition (VD) methods have been widely used in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), where credit assignment plays an important role in guiding the agents’ decentralized execution. In this paper, we investigate VD from a novel perspective of causal inference. We first show that the environment in existing VD methods is an unobserved confounder as the common cause factor of the global state and the joint value function, which leads to the confounding bias on learning credit assignment. We then present our approach, deconfounded value decomposition (DVD), which cuts off the backdoor confounding path from the global state to the joint value function. The cut is implemented by introducing the trajectory graph, which depends only on the local trajectories, as a proxy confounder. DVD is general enough to be applied to various VD methods, and extensive experiments show that DVD can consistently achieve significant performance gains over different state-of-the-art VD methods on StarCraft II and MACO benchmarks. Jiahui Li 0003, Kun Kuang 0001, Baoxiang Wang 0001, Furui Liu, Long Chen 0016, Changjie Fan, Fei Wu 0001, Jun Xiao 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | S2RL: Do We Really Need to Perceive All States in Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning?abstractCollaborative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has been widely used in many practical applications, where each agent makes a decision based on its own observation. Most mainstream methods treat each local observation as an entirety when modeling the decentralized local utility functions. However, they ignore the fact that local observation information can be further divided into several entities, and only part of the entities is helpful to model inference. Moreover, the importance of different entities may change over time. To improve the performance of decentralized policies, the attention mechanism is used to capture features of local information. Nevertheless, existing attention models rely on dense fully connected graphs and cannot better perceive important states. To this end, we propose a sparse state based MARL (S2RL) framework, which utilizes a sparse attention mechanism to discard irrelevant information in local observations. The local utility functions are estimated through the self-attention and sparse attention mechanisms separately, then are combined into a standard joint value function and auxiliary joint value function in the central critic. We design the S2RL framework as a plug-and-play module, making it general enough to be applied to various methods. Extensive experiments on StarCraft II show that S2RL can significantly improve the performance of many state-of-the-art methods. Yinchuan Li, Jiahui Li 0003, Kun Kuang 0001, Furui Liu, Yunfeng Shao 0001, Chao Wu 0001 |
KDD | 3 |
| 2021 | Shapley Counterfactual Credits for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningabstractCentralized Training with Decentralized Execution (CTDE) has been a popular paradigm in cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) settings and is widely used in many real applications. One of the major challenges in the training process is credit assignment, which aims to deduce the contributions of each agent according to the global rewards. Existing credit assignment methods focus on either decomposing the joint value function into individual value functions or measuring the impact of local observations and actions on the global value function. These approaches lack a thorough consideration of the complicated interactions among multiple agents, leading to an unsuitable assignment of credit and subsequently mediocre results on MARL. We propose Shapley Counterfactual Credit Assignment, a novel method for explicit credit assignment which accounts for the coalition of agents. Specifically, Shapley Value and its desired properties are leveraged in deep MARL to credit any combinations of agents, which grants us the capability to estimate the individual credit for each agent. Despite this capability, the main technical difficulty lies in the computational complexity of Shapley Value who grows factorially as the number of agents. We instead utilize an approximation method via Monte Carlo sampling, which reduces the sample complexity while maintaining its effectiveness. We evaluate our method on StarCraft II benchmarks across different scenarios. Our method outperforms existing cooperative MARL algorithms significantly and achieves the state-of-the-art, with especially large margins on tasks with more severe difficulties. Jiahui Li 0003, Kun Kuang 0001, Baoxiang Wang 0001, Furui Liu, Long Chen 0016, Fei Wu 0001, Jun Xiao 0001 |
KDD | 1 |
| 2021 | Instance-wise or Class-wise? A Tale of Neighbor Shapley for Concept-based ExplanationabstractInterpreting model knowledge is an essential topic to improve human understanding of deep black-box models. Traditional methods contribute to providing intuitive instance-wise explanations which allocating importance scores for low-level features (e.g, pixels for images). To adapt to the human way of thinking, one strand of recent researches has shifted its spotlight to mining important concepts. However, these concept-based interpretation methods focus on computing the contribution of each discovered concept on the class level and can not precisely give instance-wise explanations. Besides, they consider each concept as an independent unit, and ignore the interactions among concepts. To this end, in this paper, we propose a novel COncept-based NEighbor Shapley approach (dubbed as CONE-SHAP) to evaluate the importance of each concept by considering its physical and semantic neighbors, and interpret model knowledge with both instance-wise and class-wise explanations. Thanks to this design, the interactions among concepts in the same image are fully considered. Meanwhile, the computational complexity of Shapley Value is reduced from exponential to polynomial. Moreover, for a more comprehensive evaluation, we further propose three criteria to quantify the rationality of the allocated contributions for the concepts, including coherency, complexity, and faithfulness. Extensive experiments and ablations have demonstrated that our CONE-SHAP algorithm outperforms existing concept-based methods and simultaneously provides precise explanations for each instance and class. Jiahui Li 0003, Kun Kuang 0001, Lin Li 0065, Long Chen 0016, Songyang Zhang 0004, Jian Shao 0001, Jun Xiao 0001 |
ACM Multimedia | 1 |