EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aubrey Gress
dblp:153/5380
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 45% Learning theory · 21% Efficient and distributed learning · 21% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
constrained regression |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Human Guided Linear Regression With Feature-Level Constraints · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
linear regression |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Human Guided Linear Regression With Feature-Level Constraints · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Probabilistic Formulations of Regression with Mixed Guidance · ICDM 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Probabilistic Formulations of Regression with Mixed Guidance · ICDM 2016 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Accurate Estimation of Generalization Performance for Active Learning · ICDM 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
cross-validation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Accurate Estimation of Generalization Performance for Active Learning · ICDM 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization error
generalization error estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Accurate Estimation of Generalization Performance for Active Learning · ICDM 2015 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
query selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Accurate Estimation of Generalization Performance for Active Learning · ICDM 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 0.7semi-supervised learning · 0.7feature-level constraints · 0.7active learning · 0.7probabilistic modeling · 0.2convex optimization · 0.2weighted cross validation · 0.2sampling · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Human Guided Linear Regression With Feature-Level ConstraintsabstractLinear regression methods are commonly used by both researchers and data scientists due to their interpretability and their reduced likelihood of overfitting. However, these methods can still perform poorly if little labeled training data is available. Typical methods used to overcome a lack of labeled training data somehow involve exploiting an outside source of labeled data or large amounts of unlabeled data. This includes areas such as active learning, semi-supervised learning and transfer learning, but in many domains these approaches are not always applicable because they require either a mechanism to label data, large amounts of unlabeled data or additional sources of sufficiently related data. In this paper we explore an alternative, non-data centric approach. We allow the user to guide the learning system through three forms of feature-level guidance which constrain the parameters of the regression function. Such guidance is unlikely to be perfectly accurate, so we derive methods which are robust to some amounts of noise, a property we formally prove for one of our methods. Aubrey Gress, Ian Davidson |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Probabilistic Formulations of Regression with Mixed GuidanceabstractRegression problems assume every instance is annotated(labeled) with a real value, a form of annotation we call strong guidance. In order for these annotations to be accurate, they must be the result of a precise experiment or measurement. However, in some cases additional weak guidance might be given by imprecise measurements, a domain expert or even crowd sourcing. Current formulations of regression are unable to use both types of guidance. We propose a regression framework that can also incorporate weak guidance based on relative orderings, bounds, neighboring and similarity relations. Consider learning to predict ages from portrait images, these new types of guidance allow weaker forms of guidance such as stating a person is in their 20s or two people are similar in age. These types of annotations can be easier to generate than strong guidance. We introduce a probabilistic formulation for these forms of weak guidance and show that the resulting optimization problems are convex. Our experimental results show the benefits of these formulations on several data sets. Aubrey Gress, Ian Davidson |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2015 | Accurate Estimation of Generalization Performance for Active LearningabstractActive learning is a crucial method in settings where a human labeling of instances is challenging to obtain. The typical active learning loop builds a model from a few labeled instances, chooses informative unlabeled instances, asks an Oracle (i.e. a human) to label them and then rebuilds the model. Active learning is widely used with much research attention focused on determining which instances to ask the human to label. However, an understudied problem is estimating the accuracy of the learner when instances are added actively. This is a problem because regular cross validation methods may not work well due to the bias in selecting instances to label. We show that existing methods to address the issue of estimating performance are not suitable for practitioners since the scaling coefficients can have high variance, the estimators can produce nonsensical results and the estimates are empirically inaccurate in the classification setting. We propose a new general active learning method which more accurately estimates generalization performance through a sampling step and a new weighted cross validation estimator. Our method can be used with a variety of query strategies and learners. We empirically illustrate the benefits of our method to the practitioner by showing it is more accurate than the standard weighted cross validation estimator and, when used as part of a termination criterion, obtains more accurate estimates of generalization error while having comparable generalization performance. Aubrey Gress, Ian Davidson |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2014 | A Flexible Framework for Projecting Heterogeneous DataabstractIn many real world settings the data to analyze is heterogeneous consisting of (say) images, text and video. An elegant approach when dealing with such data is to project all the data to a common space so standard learning methods can be used. However, typical projection methods make strong assumptions such as the multi-view assumption (datum in one data set are always associated with a single datum in the other view) or that the multiple data sets have an overlapping feature space. Such strong assumptions limit what data such work can be applied to. We present a framework for projecting heterogeneous data from multiple data sets into a common lower dimensional space using a rich range of guidance which does not assume any overlap between the instances or features in different data sets. Our work can specify inter-dataset (between instances in different data sets) guidance and intra-dataset (between instances in the same data set) guidance, both of which can be positively or negatively weighted. We show our work offers substantially more flexibility over related methods such as Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) and Locality Preserving Projections (LPP) and illustrate its superior performance for supervised and unsupervised learning problems. Aubrey Gress, Ian Davidson |
CIKM | 1 |