Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tadek Pietraszek

dblp:153/5776 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Authentication and access control · 46% Web and mobile security · 24% Systems and software security · 15%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control › authentication › authentication attack
credential stuffing
0.412019
Protecting accounts from credential stuffing with password breach alerting · USENIX Security Symposium 2019
Web and mobile security › web security
account hijacking
0.212014
Handcrafted Fraud and Extortion: Manual Account Hijacking in the Wild · Internet Measurement Conference 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

breach alerting · 0.4workflow analysis · 0.2measurement study · 0.2longitudinal measurement study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Protecting accounts from credential stuffing with password breach alerting
Kurt Thomas, Jennifer Pullman, Kevin Yeo, Ananth Raghunathan, Patrick Gage Kelley, Luca Invernizzi, Borbala Benko, Tadek Pietraszek, Sarvar Patel, Dan Boneh, Elie Bursztein
USENIX Security Symposium8
2014 Dialing Back Abuse on Phone Verified Accounts
abstract
In the past decade the increase of for-profit cybercrime has given rise to an entire underground ecosystem supporting large-scale abuse, a facet of which encompasses the bulk registration of fraudulent accounts. In this paper, we present a 10 month logitudinal study of the underlying technical and financial capabilities of criminals who register phone verified accounts (PVA). To carry out our study, we purchase 4,695 Google PVA as well as acquire a random sample of 300,000 Google PVA through a collaboration with Google. We find that miscreants rampantly abuse free VOIP services to circumvent the intended cost of acquiring phone numbers, in effect undermining phone verification. Combined with short lived phone numbers from India and Indonesia that we suspect are tied to human verification farms, this confluence of factors correlates with a market-wide price drop of 30--40% for Google PVA until Google penalized verifications from frequently abused carriers. We distill our findings into a set of recommendations for any services performing phone verification as well as highlight open challenges related to PVA abuse moving forward.
Kurt Thomas, Dmytro Iatskiv, Elie Bursztein, Tadek Pietraszek, Chris Grier, Damon McCoy
CCS4
2014 Handcrafted Fraud and Extortion: Manual Account Hijacking in the Wild
abstract
Online accounts are inherently valuable resources---both for the data they contain and the reputation they accrue over time. Unsurprisingly, this value drives criminals to steal, or hijack, such accounts. In this paper we focus on manual account hijacking---account hijacking performed manually by humans instead of botnets. We describe the details of the hijacking workflow: the attack vectors, the exploitation phase, and post-hijacking remediation. Finally we share, as a large online company, which defense strategies we found effective to curb manual hijacking.
Elie Bursztein, Borbala Benko, Dan Margolis, Tadek Pietraszek, Andy Archer, Allan Aquino, Andreas Pitsillidis, Stefan Savage
Internet Measurement Conference4