Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Matthias Heuberger

dblp:153/6036 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 62% Immersive interaction · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology › older adults
technology for older adults
0.212014
Towards mobile augmented reality for the elderly · ISMAR 2014
Immersive interaction
augmented reality interaction
0.112014
Towards mobile augmented reality for the elderly · ISMAR 2014
Immersive interaction › augmented reality
handheld augmented reality
0.112014
Towards mobile augmented reality for the elderly · ISMAR 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user test · 0.2field study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Towards mobile augmented reality for the elderly
abstract
Mobility and independence are key aspects for self-determined living in today's world and demographic change presents the challenge to retain these aspects for the aging population. Augmented Reality (AR) user interfaces might support the elderly, for example, when navigating as pedestrians or by explaining how devices and mobility aids work and how they are maintained. This poster reports on the results of practical field tests with elderly subjects testing handheld AR applications. The main finding is that common handheld AR user interfaces are not suited for the elderly because they require the user to hold up the device so the back-facing camera captures the object or environment related to which digital information shall be presented. Tablet computers are too heavy and they do not provide sufficient grip to hold them over a long period of time. One possible alternative is using head-mounted displays (HMD). We present the promising results of a user test evaluating whether elderly people can deal with AR interfaces on a lightweight HMD. We conclude with an outlook to improved handheld AR user interfaces that do not require continuously holding up the device, which we hope are better suited for the elderly.
Daniel Kurz, Anton Fedosov, Stefan Diewald, Jorg Guttier, Barbara Geilhof, Matthias Heuberger
ISMAR6