Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kristan Marlow
dblp:153/7777
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 70% Robot manipulation · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
kinematic modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A comparison of the yaw constraining performance of SCARA-tau parallel manipulator variants via screw theory · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › parallel manipulator
parallel manipulator design |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A comparison of the yaw constraining performance of SCARA-tau parallel manipulator variants via screw theory · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
screw theory |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A comparison of the yaw constraining performance of SCARA-tau parallel manipulator variants via screw theory · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
workspace analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | A comparison of the yaw constraining performance of SCARA-tau parallel manipulator variants via screw theory · ICRA 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
screw theory · 0.2reciprocal product · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | A comparison of the yaw constraining performance of SCARA-tau parallel manipulator variants via screw theoryabstractThe SCARA-Tau parallel manipulator was derived with the objective to overcome the limited workspace-to-footprint ratio of the DELTA parallel manipulator while maintaining its many benefits. The SCARA-Tau family has later been extended and a large number of variants have been proposed. In this paper, we analyse four of these variants, which together encompass the main differences between all the proposed SCARA-Tau manipulators. The analysed manipulator variants utilise an identical arrangement of five of the six linkages connecting the actuated arms and the manipulated platform and exhibit the same input-output Jacobian. The normalised reciprocal product between the wrench of the sixth linkage and the twist of the platform occurring without this linkage provides a measure on how effectively the sixth linkage constrains the manipulated platform. A comparison of the manipulator variants with respect to this measure demonstrates each variants suitability for specific applications. Mats Isaksson, Kristan Marlow, Torgny Brogårdh, Anders P. Eriksson |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2014 | Workspace analysis of two similar 3-DOF axis-symmetric parallel manipulatorsabstractAlthough parallel manipulators possess the benefits of high acceleration and accuracy, they typically suffer from a limited workspace to footprint ratio. This paper presents a workspace analysis of two recently proposed axis-symmetric parallel manipulators designed to overcome this problem. The studied manipulators are parametrized, their inverse kinematic models are derived and an in-depth singularity analysis is performed. Next, the architectural parameters are generated for one of the manipulators, using a meta-heuristic algorithm to produce the maximum singularity-free workspace. Thereafter, a second parameter calculation is performed to examine the relationship between maximizing the global conditioning index (GCI) and the resultant achievable workspace for the manipulators. Kristan Marlow, Mats Isaksson, Hamid Abdi, Saeid Nahavandi |
IROS | 1 |