Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anna Eva Hallin
dblp:153/9575
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-1342-9223ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Speech recognition and synthesis · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › error detection
grammatical error detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Data Driven Grammatical Error Detection in Transcripts of Children's Speech · EMNLP 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › spoken language understanding
spoken language processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Data Driven Grammatical Error Detection in Transcripts of Children's Speech · EMNLP 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dependency parsing · 0.2data-driven error labeling · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Data Driven Grammatical Error Detection in Transcripts of Children's SpeechabstractWe investigate grammatical error detection in spoken language, and present a data-driven method to train a dependency parser to automatically identify and label grammatical errors.This method is agnostic to the label set used, and the only manual annotations needed for training are grammatical error labels.We find that the proposed system is robust to disfluencies, so that a separate stage to elide disfluencies is not required.The proposed system outperforms two baseline systems on two different corpora that use different sets of error tags.It is able to identify utterances with grammatical errors with an F1-score as high as 0.623, as compared to a baseline F1 of 0.350 on the same data. Eric Morley, Anna Eva Hallin, Brian Roark |
EMNLP | 2 |