Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anna Eva Hallin

dblp:153/9575 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-1342-9223ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Speech recognition and synthesis · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › error detection
grammatical error detection
0.212014
Data Driven Grammatical Error Detection in Transcripts of Children's Speech · EMNLP 2014
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › spoken language understanding
spoken language processing
0.112014
Data Driven Grammatical Error Detection in Transcripts of Children's Speech · EMNLP 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dependency parsing · 0.2data-driven error labeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Data Driven Grammatical Error Detection in Transcripts of Children's Speech
abstract
We investigate grammatical error detection in spoken language, and present a data-driven method to train a dependency parser to automatically identify and label grammatical errors.This method is agnostic to the label set used, and the only manual annotations needed for training are grammatical error labels.We find that the proposed system is robust to disfluencies, so that a separate stage to elide disfluencies is not required.The proposed system outperforms two baseline systems on two different corpora that use different sets of error tags.It is able to identify utterances with grammatical errors with an F1-score as high as 0.623, as compared to a baseline F1 of 0.350 on the same data.
Eric Morley, Anna Eva Hallin, Brian Roark
EMNLP2