EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Verena Starke
dblp:154/0375
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational microbiology › microbiome analysis
microbial community profiling |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Thresher: an improved algorithm for peak height thresholding of microbial community profiles · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
replicate similarity testing · 0.2outlier rejection · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Thresher: an improved algorithm for peak height thresholding of microbial community profilesabstractMOTIVATION: This article presents Thresher, an improved technique for finding peak height thresholds for automated rRNA intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) profiles. We argue that thresholds must be sample dependent, taking community richness into account. In most previous fragment analyses, a common threshold is applied to all samples simultaneously, ignoring richness variations among samples and thereby compromising cross-sample comparison. Our technique solves this problem, and at the same time provides a robust method for outlier rejection, selecting for removal any replicate pairs that are not valid replicates. RESULTS: Thresholds are calculated individually for each replicate in a pair, and separately for each sample. The thresholds are selected to be the ones that minimize the dissimilarity between the replicates after thresholding. If a choice of threshold results in the two replicates in a pair failing a quantitative test of similarity, either that threshold or that sample must be rejected. We compare thresholded ARISA results with sequencing results, and demonstrate that the Thresher algorithm outperforms conventional thresholding techniques. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is implemented in R, and the code is available at http://verenastarke.wordpress.com or by contacting the author. CONTACT: [email protected] or http://verenastarke.wordpress.com SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Verena Starke, Andrew Steele |
Bioinform. | 1 |