Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Nodzenski
dblp:154/0413
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-5476-8427ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genome-wide association study
epistasis detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GADGETS: a genetic algorithm for detecting epistasis using nuclear families · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genetic association study
family-based association test |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GADGETS: a genetic algorithm for detecting epistasis using nuclear families · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genetic epidemiology |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GADGETS: a genetic algorithm for detecting epistasis using nuclear families · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GADGETS: a genetic algorithm for detecting epistasis using nuclear families · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metabolomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Metabomxtr: an R package for mixture-model analysis of non-targeted metabolomics data · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
permutation testing · 0.6genetic algorithm · 0.6statistical analysis · 0.2mixture model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Erratum to: GADGETS: a genetic algorithm for detecting epistasis using nuclear families
Michael Nodzenski, Min Shi 0002, Juno M. Krahn, Alison S. Wise, Leping Li, David M. Umbach, Clarice R. Weinberg |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2022 | GADGETS: a genetic algorithm for detecting epistasis using nuclear familiesabstractMOTIVATION: Epistasis may play an etiologic role in complex diseases, but research has been hindered because identification of interactions among sets of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) requires exploration of immense search spaces. Current approaches using nuclear families accommodate at most several hundred candidate SNPs. RESULTS: GADGETS detects epistatic SNP-sets by applying a genetic algorithm to case-parent or case-sibling data. To allow for multiple epistatic sets, island subpopulations of SNP-sets evolve separately under selection for evident joint relevance to disease risk. The software evaluates the identified SNP-sets via permutation testing and provides graphical visualization. GADGETS correctly identified epistatic SNP-sets in realistically simulated case-parent triads with 10 000 candidate SNPs, far more SNPs than competitors can handle, and it outperformed competitors in simulations with many fewer SNPs. Applying GADGETS to family-based oral-clefting data from dbGaP identified SNP-sets with possible epistatic effects on risk. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GADGETS is part of the epistasisGA package at https://github.com/mnodzenski/epistasisGA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Michael Nodzenski, Min Shi 0002, Juno M. Krahn, Alison S. Wise, Leping Li, David M. Umbach, Clarice R. Weinberg |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2017 | Mixture model normalization for non-targeted gas chromatography/mass spectrometry metabolomics dataabstractBACKGROUND: Metabolomics offers a unique integrative perspective for health research, reflecting genetic and environmental contributions to disease-related phenotypes. Identifying robust associations in population-based or large-scale clinical studies demands large numbers of subjects and therefore sample batching for gas-chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) non-targeted assays. When run over weeks or months, technical noise due to batch and run-order threatens data interpretability. Application of existing normalization methods to metabolomics is challenged by unsatisfied modeling assumptions and, notably, failure to address batch-specific truncation of low abundance compounds. RESULTS: To curtail technical noise and make GC/MS metabolomics data amenable to analyses describing biologically relevant variability, we propose mixture model normalization (mixnorm) that accommodates truncated data and estimates per-metabolite batch and run-order effects using quality control samples. Mixnorm outperforms other approaches across many metrics, including improved correlation of non-targeted and targeted measurements and superior performance when metabolite detectability varies according to batch. For some metrics, particularly when truncation is less frequent for a metabolite, mean centering and median scaling demonstrate comparable performance to mixnorm. CONCLUSIONS: When quality control samples are systematically included in batches, mixnorm is uniquely suited to normalizing non-targeted GC/MS metabolomics data due to explicit accommodation of batch effects, run order and varying thresholds of detectability. Especially in large-scale studies, normalization is crucial for drawing accurate conclusions from non-targeted GC/MS metabolomics data. Anna C. Reisetter, Michael J. Muehlbauer, James R. Bain, Michael Nodzenski, Robert D. Stevens 0002, Olga Ilkayeva, Boyd E. Metzger, Christopher B. Newgard, William L. Lowe Jr., Denise M. Scholtens |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2014 | Metabomxtr: an R package for mixture-model analysis of non-targeted metabolomics dataabstractSUMMARY: Non-targeted metabolomics technologies often yield data in which abundance for any given metabolite is observed and quantified for some samples and reported as missing for other samples. Apparent missingness can be due to true absence of the metabolite in the sample or presence at a level below detectability. Mixture-model analysis can formally account for metabolite 'missingness' due to absence or undetectability, but software for this type of analysis in the high-throughput setting is limited. The R package metabomxtr has been developed to facilitate mixture-model analysis of non-targeted metabolomics data in which only a portion of samples have quantifiable abundance for certain metabolites. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: metabomxtr is available through Bioconductor. It is released under the GPL-2 license. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Michael Nodzenski, Michael J. Muehlbauer, James R. Bain, Anna C. Reisetter, William L. Lowe Jr., Denise M. Scholtens |
Bioinform. | 1 |