Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Bastounis
dblp:154/6767
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-2867-4635ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 87% Deep learning architectures and training · 13% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 50% Cyber-physical and IoT security · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
knowledge editing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Stealth edits to large language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language model editing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Stealth edits to large language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › poisoning attack
model weight attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Stealth edits to large language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Cyber-physical and IoT security
stealthy attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Stealth edits to large language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weight editing · 1.5jet-pack network block · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Stealth edits to large language modelsabstractWe reveal the theoretical foundations of techniques for editing large language models, and present new methods which can do so without requiring retraining. Our theoretical insights show that a single metric (a measure of the intrinsic dimension of the model's features) can be used to assess a model's editability and reveals its previously unrecognised susceptibility to malicious *stealth attacks*. This metric is fundamental to predicting the success of a variety of editing approaches, and reveals new bridges between disparate families of editing methods. We collectively refer to these as *stealth editing* methods, because they directly update a model's weights to specify its response to specific known hallucinating prompts without affecting other model behaviour. By carefully applying our theoretical insights, we are able to introduce a new *jet-pack* network block which is optimised for highly selective model editing, uses only standard network operations, and can be inserted into existing networks. We also reveal the vulnerability of language models to stealth attacks: a small change to a model's weights which fixes its response to a single attacker-chosen prompt. Stealth attacks are computationally simple, do not require access to or knowledge of the model's training data, and therefore represent a potent yet previously unrecognised threat to redistributed foundation models. Extensive experimental results illustrate and support our methods and their theoretical underpinnings. Demos and source code are available at https://github.com/qinghua-zhou/stealth-edits. Oliver J. Sutton, Wei Wang 0357, Desmond J. Higham, Alexander N. Gorban, Alexander Bastounis, Ivan Tyukin |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2024 | How adversarial attacks can disrupt seemingly stable accurate classifiersabstractAdversarial attacks dramatically change the output of an otherwise accurate learning system using a seemingly inconsequential modification to a piece of input data. Paradoxically, empirical evidence indicates that even systems which are robust to large random perturbations of the input data remain susceptible to small, easily constructed, adversarial perturbations of their inputs. Here, we show that this may be seen as a fundamental feature of classifiers working with high dimensional input data. We introduce a simple generic and generalisable framework for which key behaviours observed in practical systems arise with high probability-notably the simultaneous susceptibility of the (otherwise accurate) model to easily constructed adversarial attacks, and robustness to random perturbations of the input data. We confirm that the same phenomena are directly observed in practical neural networks trained on standard image classification problems, where even large additive random noise fails to trigger the adversarial instability of the network. A surprising takeaway is that even small margins separating a classifier's decision surface from training and testing data can hide adversarial susceptibility from being detected using randomly sampled perturbations. Counter-intuitively, using additive noise during training or testing is therefore inefficient for eradicating or detecting adversarial examples, and more demanding adversarial training is required. Oliver J. Sutton, Ivan Tyukin, Alexander N. Gorban, Alexander Bastounis, Desmond J. Higham |
Neural Networks | 5 |
| 2023 | The Boundaries of Verifiable Accuracy, Robustness, and Generalisation in Deep Learning
Alexander Bastounis, Alexander N. Gorban, Anders C. Hansen, Desmond J. Higham, Danil V. Prokhorov, Oliver J. Sutton, Ivan Tyukin |
ICANN (1) | 1 |
| 2017 | On the Absence of Uniform Recovery in Many Real-World Applications of Compressed Sensing and the Restricted Isometry Property and Nullspace Property in LevelsabstractThe purpose of this paper is twofold. The first is to point out that the property of uniform recovery, meaning that all sparse vectors are recovered, does not hold in many applications where compressed sensing is successfully used. This includes fields like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance computerized tomography, electron tomography, radio interferometry, helium atom scattering, and fluorescence microscopy. We demonstrate that for natural compressed sensing matrices involving a level based reconstruction basis (e.g., wavelets), the number of measurements required to recover all $s$-sparse signals for reasonable $s$ is excessive. In particular, uniform recovery of all $s$-sparse signals is quite unrealistic. This realization explains why the restricted isometry property (RIP) is insufficient for explaining the success of compressed sensing in various practical applications. The second purpose of the paper is to introduce a new framework based on a generalized RIP and a generalized nullspace property that fit the applications where compressed sensing is used. We demonstrate that the shortcomings previously used to prove that uniform recovery is unreasonable no longer apply if we instead ask for structured recovery that is uniform only within each of the levels. To examine this phenomenon, a new tool, termed the “restricted isometry property in levels” ($RIP_L$) is described and analyzed. Furthermore, we show that with certain conditions on the $RIP_L$, a form of uniform recovery within each level is possible. Fortunately, recent theoretical advances made by Li and Adcock demonstrate the existence of large classes of matrices that satisfy the $RIP_L$. Moreover, such matrices are used extensively in applications such as MRI. Finally, we conclude the paper by providing examples that demonstrate the optimality of the results obtained. Alexander Bastounis, Anders C. Hansen |
SIAM J. Imaging Sci. | 1 |