Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marcel Simon
dblp:154/6780
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-6202-6183ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 47% Image recognition and object detection · 41% Representation and self-supervised learning · 9% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification |
0.9 | 3 | 2020 | The Whole Is More Than Its Parts? From Explicit to Implicit Pose Normalization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 Generalized Orderless Pooling Performs Implicit Salient Matching · ICCV 2017 Neural Activation Constellations: Unsupervised Part Model Discovery with Convolutional Networks · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network layer design › pooling
bilinear pooling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Whole Is More Than Its Parts? From Explicit to Implicit Pose Normalization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network layer design
pooling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Whole Is More Than Its Parts? From Explicit to Implicit Pose Normalization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network layer design › pooling
feature pooling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Generalized Orderless Pooling Performs Implicit Salient Matching · ICCV 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › part-based representation learning
unsupervised part discovery |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Neural Activation Constellations: Unsupervised Part Model Discovery with Convolutional Networks · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Generalized Orderless Pooling Performs Implicit Salient Matching · ICCV 2017 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Neural Activation Constellations: Unsupervised Part Model Discovery with Convolutional Networks · ICCV 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
convolutional neural network · 0.7activation flow visualization · 0.4α-pooling · 0.3saliency visualization · 0.3bilinear pooling · 0.3data augmentation · 0.2activation pattern constellations · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | The Whole Is More Than Its Parts? From Explicit to Implicit Pose NormalizationabstractFine-grained classification describes the automated recognition of visually similar object categories like birds species. Previous works were usually based on explicit pose normalization, i.e., the detection and description of object parts. However, recent models based on a final global average or bilinear pooling have achieved a comparable accuracy without this concept. In this paper, we analyze the advantages of these approaches over generic CNNs and explicit pose normalization approaches. We also show how they can achieve an implicit normalization of the object pose. A novel visualization technique called activation flow is introduced to investigate limitations in pose handling in traditional CNNs like AlexNet and VGG. Afterward, we present and compare the explicit pose normalization approach neural activation constellations and a generalized framework for the final global average and bilinear pooling called α-pooling. We observe that the latter often achieves a higher accuracy improving common CNN models by up to 22.9 percent, but lacks the interpretability of the explicit approaches. We present a visualization approach for understanding and analyzing predictions of the model to address this issue. Furthermore, we show that our approaches for fine-grained recognition are beneficial for other fields like action recognition. Marcel Simon, Erik Rodner, Trevor Darrell, Joachim Denzler |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2017 | Generalized Orderless Pooling Performs Implicit Salient MatchingabstractMost recent CNN architectures use average pooling as a final feature encoding step. In the field of fine-grained recognition, however, recent global representations like bilinear pooling offer improved performance. In this paper, we generalize average and bilinear pooling to “α-pooling”, allowing for learning the pooling strategy during training. In addition, we present a novel way to visualize decisions made by these approaches. We identify parts of training images having the highest influence on the prediction of a given test image. This allows for justifying decisions to users and also for analyzing the influence of semantic parts. For example, we can show that the higher capacity VGG16 model focuses much more on the bird's head than, e.g., the lower-capacity VGG-M model when recognizing fine-grained bird categories. Both contributions allow us to analyze the difference when moving between average and bilinear pooling. In addition, experiments show that our generalized approach can outperform both across a variety of standard datasets. Marcel Simon, Yang Gao 0029, Trevor Darrell, Joachim Denzler, Erik Rodner |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2017 | Multi-marker tracking for large-scale X-ray stereo video data
Marcel Simon, Joachim Denzler |
Signal Process. Image Commun. | 2 |
| 2016 | Fine-grained Recognition in the Noisy Wild: Sensitivity Analysis of Convolutional Neural Networks Approaches
Erik Rodner, Marcel Simon, Robert B. Fisher, Joachim Denzler |
BMVC | 2 |
| 2015 | Neural Activation Constellations: Unsupervised Part Model Discovery with Convolutional NetworksabstractPart models of object categories are essential for challenging recognition tasks, where differences in categories are subtle and only reflected in appearances of small parts of the object. We present an approach that is able to learn part models in a completely unsupervised manner, without part annotations and even without given bounding boxes during learning. The key idea is to find constellations of neural activation patterns computed using convolutional neural networks. In our experiments, we outperform existing approaches for fine-grained recognition on the CUB200-2011, Oxford PETS, and Oxford Flowers dataset in case no part or bounding box annotations are available and achieve state-of-the-art performance for the Stanford Dog dataset. We also show the benefits of neural constellation models as a data augmentation technique for fine-tuning. Furthermore, our paper unites the areas of generic and fine-grained classification, since our approach is suitable for both scenarios. Marcel Simon, Erik Rodner |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2014 | Part Detector Discovery in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Marcel Simon, Erik Rodner, Joachim Denzler |
ACCV (2) | 1 |