Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jianpeng Cheng 0001

dblp:154/6788-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-7748-4443ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Language models and text generation · 31% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 28% Information extraction and text analysis · 17%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.912025
ASPERA: A Simulated Environment to Evaluate Planning for Complex Action Execution · ACL (1) 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
planning evaluation
0.912025
ASPERA: A Simulated Environment to Evaluate Planning for Complex Action Execution · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.412020
A Generative Model for Joint Natural Language Understanding and Generation · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue
0.412020
A Generative Model for Joint Natural Language Understanding and Generation · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › grammar induction
dependency grammar induction
0.412019
Dependency Grammar Induction with a Neural Variational Transition-Based Parser · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.412019
Dependency Grammar Induction with a Neural Variational Transition-Based Parser · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
transition-based parsing
0.412019
Dependency Grammar Induction with a Neural Variational Transition-Based Parser · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.312017
Learning Structured Natural Language Representations for Semantic Parsing · ACL (1) 2017
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive summarization
0.212016
Neural Summarization by Extracting Sentences and Words · ACL (1) 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › memory-augmented neural networks
memory network
0.212016
Long Short-Term Memory-Networks for Machine Reading · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.212016
Long Short-Term Memory-Networks for Machine Reading · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.212016
Neural Summarization by Extracting Sentences and Words · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding
0.112017
Learning Structured Natural Language Representations for Semantic Parsing · ACL (1) 2017
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.112016
Neural Summarization by Extracting Sentences and Words · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language modeling
0.112016
Long Short-Term Memory-Networks for Machine Reading · EMNLP 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulated environment · 0.9semi-supervised learning · 0.4variational inference · 0.4variance reduction · 0.4posterior regularization · 0.4transition system · 0.3end-to-end training · 0.3hierarchical encoder · 0.2attention-based extraction · 0.2attention · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ASPERA: A Simulated Environment to Evaluate Planning for Complex Action Execution
abstract
Alexandru Coca, Mark Gaynor, Zhenxing Zhang, Jianpeng Cheng, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Peter Boothroyd, Hector Martinez Alonso, Diarmuid O Seaghdha, Anders Johannsen. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Alexandru Coca, Mark Gaynor, Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Peter Boothroyd, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen
ACL (1)4
2025 PyTOD: Programmable Task-Oriented Dialogue with Execution Feedback
abstract
Programmable task-oriented dialogue (TOD) agents enable language models to follow structured dialogue policies, but their effectiveness hinges on accurate dialogue state tracking (DST). We present PyTOD, an agent that generates executable code to track dialogue state and uses policy and execution feedback for efficient error correction. To achieve this, PyTOD employs a simple constrained decoding approach, using a language model instead of grammar rules to follow API schemata. This leads to state-of-the-art DST performance on the challenging SGD benchmark. Our experiments show that PyTOD surpasses strong baselines in both accuracy and cross-turn consistency, demonstrating the effectiveness of execution-aware state tracking.
Alexandru Coca, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Peter Boothroyd, Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Mark Gaynor, Joe Stacey, Tristan Guigue, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen
SIGDIAL4
2020 A Generative Model for Joint Natural Language Understanding and Generation
abstract
Natural language understanding (NLU) and natural language generation (NLG) are two fundamental and related tasks in building task-oriented dialogue systems with opposite objectives: NLU tackles the transformation from natural language to formal representations, whereas NLG does the reverse.A key to success in either task is parallel training data which is expensive to obtain at a large scale.In this work, we propose a generative model which couples NLU and NLG through a shared latent variable.This approach allows us to explore both spaces of natural language and formal representations, and facilitates information sharing through the latent space to eventually benefit NLU and NLG.Our model achieves state-of-the-art performance on two dialogue datasets with both flat and tree-structured formal representations.We also show that the model can be trained in a semi-supervised fashion by utilising unlabelled data to boost its performance.
Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Yimai Fang, David Vandyke
ACL2
2019 Dependency Grammar Induction with a Neural Variational Transition-Based Parser
abstract
Dependency grammar induction is the task of learning dependency syntax without annotated training data. Traditional graph-based models with global inference achieve state-ofthe-art results on this task but they require O(n3) run time. Transition-based models enable faster inference with O(n) time complexity, but their performance still lags behind. In this work, we propose a neural transition-based parser for dependency grammar induction, whose inference procedure utilizes rich neural features with O(n) time complexity. We train the parser with an integration of variational inference, posterior regularization and variance reduction techniques. The resulting framework outperforms previous unsupervised transition-based dependency parsers and achieves performance comparable to graph-based models, both on the English Penn Treebank and on the Universal Dependency Treebank. In an empirical comparison, we show that our approach substantially increases parsing speed over graphbased models.
Bowen Li 0002, Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Yang Liu 0124, Frank Keller
AAAI2
2019 Learning an Executable Neural Semantic Parser
abstract
This article describes a neural semantic parser that maps natural language utterances onto logical forms that can be executed against a task-specific environment, such as a knowledge base or a database, to produce a response. The parser generates tree-structured logical forms with a transition-based approach, combining a generic tree-generation algorithm with domain-general grammar defined by the logical language. The generation process is modeled by structured recurrent neural networks, which provide a rich encoding of the sentential context and generation history for making predictions. To tackle mismatches between natural language and logical form tokens, various attention mechanisms are explored. Finally, we consider different training settings for the neural semantic parser, including fully supervised training where annotated logical forms are given, weakly supervised training where denotations are provided, and distant supervision where only unlabeled sentences and a knowledge base are available. Experiments across a wide range of data sets demonstrate the effectiveness of our parser.
Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Siva Reddy, Vijay A. Saraswat, Mirella Lapata
Comput. Linguistics1
2018 Weakly-Supervised Neural Semantic Parsing with a Generative Ranker
abstract
Weakly-supervised semantic parsers are trained on utterance-denotation pairs, treating logical forms as latent.The task is challenging due to the large search space and spuriousness of logical forms.In this paper we introduce a neural parser-ranker system for weakly-supervised semantic parsing.The parser generates candidate tree-structured logical forms from utterances using clues of denotations.These candidates are then ranked based on two criterion: their likelihood of executing to the correct denotation, and their agreement with the utterance semantics.We present a scheduled training procedure to balance the contribution of the two objectives.Furthermore, we propose to use a neurally encoded lexicon to inject prior domain knowledge to the model.Experiments on three Freebase datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our semantic parser, achieving results within the state-of-the-art range.
Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Mirella Lapata
CoNLL1
2017 Learning Structured Natural Language Representations for Semantic Parsing
abstract
We introduce a neural semantic parser which is interpretable and scalable.Our model converts natural language utterances to intermediate, domain-general natural language representations in the form of predicate-argument structures, which are induced with a transition system and subsequently mapped to target domains.The semantic parser is trained end-to-end using annotated logical forms or their denotations.We achieve the state of the art on SPADES and GRAPHQUESTIONS and obtain competitive results on GEO-QUERY and WEBQUESTIONS.The induced predicate-argument structures shed light on the types of representations useful for semantic parsing and how these are different from linguistically motivated ones. 1
Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Siva Reddy, Vijay A. Saraswat, Mirella Lapata
ACL (1)1
2017 Dependency Parsing as Head Selection
abstract
Conventional graph-based dependency parsers guarantee a tree structure both during training and inference.Instead, we formalize dependency parsing as the problem of independently selecting the head of each word in a sentence.Our model which we call DENSE (as shorthand for Dependency Neural Selection) produces a distribution over possible heads for each word using features obtained from a bidirectional recurrent neural network.Without enforcing structural constraints during training, DENSE generates (at inference time) trees for the overwhelming majority of sentences, while non-tree outputs can be adjusted with a maximum spanning tree algorithm.We evaluate DENSE on four languages (English, Chinese, Czech, and German) with varying degrees of non-projectivity.Despite the simplicity of the approach, our parsers are on par with the state of the art. 1
Xingxing Zhang 0002, Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Mirella Lapata
EACL (1)2
2016 Neural Summarization by Extracting Sentences and Words
abstract
Traditional approaches to extractive summarization rely heavily on humanengineered features.In this work we propose a data-driven approach based on neural networks and continuous sentence features.We develop a general framework for single-document summarization composed of a hierarchical document encoder and an attention-based extractor.This architecture allows us to develop different classes of summarization models which can extract sentences or words.We train our models on large scale corpora containing hundreds of thousands of document-summary pairs 1 .Experimental results on two summarization datasets demonstrate that our models obtain results comparable to the state of the art without any access to linguistic annotation.
Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Mirella Lapata
ACL (1)1
2016 Long Short-Term Memory-Networks for Machine Reading
abstract
In this paper we address the question of how to render sequence-level networks better at handling structured input. We propose a machine reading simulator which processes text incrementally from left to right and performs shallow reasoning with memory and attention. The reader extends the Long Short-Term Memory architecture with a memory network in place of a single memory cell. This enables adaptive memory usage during recurrence with neural attention, offering a way to weakly induce relations among tokens. The system is initially designed to process a single sequence but we also demonstrate how to integrate it with an encoder-decoder architecture. Experiments on language modeling, sentiment analysis, and natural language inference show that our model matches or outperforms the state of the art.
Jianpeng Cheng 0001, Li Dong 0004, Mirella Lapata
EMNLP1