Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mohamed S. Mohamed
dblp:154/7160
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
edge differential privacy |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
private community detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2022 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
community detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stability-based mechanism · 1.1sampling-based mechanism · 1.1graph perturbation · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block ModelsabstractThe goal of community detection over graphs is to recover underlying labels/attributes of users (e.g., political affiliation) given the connectivity between users. There has been significant recent progress on understanding the fundamental limits of community detection when the graph is generated from a stochastic block model (SBM). Specifically, sharp information theoretic limits and efficient algorithms have been obtained for SBMs as a function of $p$ and $q$, which represent the intra-community and inter-community connection probabilities. In this paper, we study the community detection problem while preserving the privacy of the individual connections between the vertices. Focusing on the notion of $(\epsilon, \delta)$-edge differential privacy (DP), we seek to understand the fundamental tradeoffs between $(p, q)$, DP budget $(\epsilon, \delta)$, and computational efficiency for exact recovery of community labels. To this end, we present and analyze the associated information-theoretic tradeoffs for three differentially private community recovery mechanisms: a) stability based mechanism; b) sampling based mechanisms; and c) graph perturbation mechanisms. Our main findings are that stability and sampling based mechanisms lead to a superior tradeoff between $(p,q)$ and the privacy budget $(\epsilon, \delta)$; however this comes at the expense of higher computational complexity. On the other hand, albeit low complexity, graph perturbation mechanisms require the privacy budget $\epsilon$ to scale as $\Omega(\log(n))$ for exact recovery. Mohamed S. Mohamed, Dung Nguyen 0002, Anil Vullikanti, Ravi Tandon |
ICML | 1 |