Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mohamed S. Mohamed

dblp:154/7160 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.612022
Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2022
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
edge differential privacy
0.612022
Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2022
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
private community detection
0.612022
Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2022
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
community detection
0.612022
Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stability-based mechanism · 1.1sampling-based mechanism · 1.1graph perturbation · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Differentially Private Community Detection for Stochastic Block Models
abstract
The goal of community detection over graphs is to recover underlying labels/attributes of users (e.g., political affiliation) given the connectivity between users. There has been significant recent progress on understanding the fundamental limits of community detection when the graph is generated from a stochastic block model (SBM). Specifically, sharp information theoretic limits and efficient algorithms have been obtained for SBMs as a function of $p$ and $q$, which represent the intra-community and inter-community connection probabilities. In this paper, we study the community detection problem while preserving the privacy of the individual connections between the vertices. Focusing on the notion of $(\epsilon, \delta)$-edge differential privacy (DP), we seek to understand the fundamental tradeoffs between $(p, q)$, DP budget $(\epsilon, \delta)$, and computational efficiency for exact recovery of community labels. To this end, we present and analyze the associated information-theoretic tradeoffs for three differentially private community recovery mechanisms: a) stability based mechanism; b) sampling based mechanisms; and c) graph perturbation mechanisms. Our main findings are that stability and sampling based mechanisms lead to a superior tradeoff between $(p,q)$ and the privacy budget $(\epsilon, \delta)$; however this comes at the expense of higher computational complexity. On the other hand, albeit low complexity, graph perturbation mechanisms require the privacy budget $\epsilon$ to scale as $\Omega(\log(n))$ for exact recovery.
Mohamed S. Mohamed, Dung Nguyen 0002, Anil Vullikanti, Ravi Tandon
ICML1