Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vikas Deep
dblp:154/8629
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4763-0822ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Learning theory · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
a/b testing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Asymptotically Optimal and Computationally Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation in A/B testing · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
average treatment effect estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Asymptotically Optimal and Computationally Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation in A/B testing · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
experimental design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Asymptotically Optimal and Computationally Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation in A/B testing · ICML 2024 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
adaptive sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Asymptotically Optimal and Computationally Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation in A/B testing · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
max-min optimization · 1.5confidence intervals · 1.5adaptive policy · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Asymptotically Optimal and Computationally Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation in A/B testingabstractMotivated by practical applications in clinical trials and online platforms, we study A/B testing with the aim of estimating a confidence interval (CI) for the average treatment effect (ATE) using the minimum expected sample size. This CI should have a width at most $\epsilon$ while ensuring that the probability of the CI not containing the true ATE is at most $\delta$. To answer this, we first establish a lower bound on the expected sample size needed for any adaptive policy which constructs a CI of ATE with desired properties. Specifically, we prove that the lower bound is based on the solution to a max-min non-convex optimization problem for small $\delta$. Tailoring the “plug-in” approach for the ATE problem, we construct an adaptive policy that is asymptotically optimal, i.e., matches the lower bound on the expected sample size for small $\delta$. Interestingly, we find that, for small $\epsilon$ and $\delta$, the asymptotically optimal fraction of treatment assignment for A and B is proportional to the standard deviation of the outcome distributions of treatments A and B, respectively. However, as the proposed approach can be computationally intensive, we propose an alternative adaptive policy. This new policy, informed by insights from our lower bound analysis, is computationally efficient while remaining asymptotically optimal for small values of $\epsilon$ and $\delta$. Numerical comparisons demonstrate that both policies perform similarly across practical values of $\epsilon$ and $\delta$, offering efficient solutions for A/B testing. Vikas Deep, Achal Bassamboo, Sandeep Juneja 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Principal component analysis, hidden Markov model, and artificial neural network inspired techniques to recognize facesabstractAbstract Face Recognition is a challenging task for recognizing and detecting the identity of an individual. Although, plethora of work has already been done in the field of pattern recognition still there has been lot which has not been addressed in any of the literature. In the current research, we have presented a comparative analysis using three popularly known techniques for face recognition namely, Principal Components Analysis (PCA) using Eigen Faces, Hidden Markov Model (HMM) using Singular Value Decomposition, and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) using Gabor filters. These techniques are implemented and evaluated using various measuring metrics such as false acceptance, false recognition rate, and so on. We used ORL and Yale Face dataset to test the robustness of implemented algorithms. Results show that ANN model for face recognition outperforms the other two techniques by achieving more accurate results and shows the highest recognition rate of 97.49% on ORL database. Moreover, it is also observed that ANN model shows the minimum error count of about 2.502% on ORL database while it is 3.5% on Yale Face dataset. To evaluate further, the implemented techniques are compared with best known techniques in class implemented by various researchers. Akarsh Aggarwal, Mohammed Alshehri, Manoj Kumar 0009, Purushottam Sharma, Osama Alfarraj, Vikas Deep |
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. | 6 |
| 2020 | A DE-ANN Inspired Skin Cancer Detection Approach Using Fuzzy C-Means Clustering
Manoj Kumar 0009, Mohammed Alshehri, Rayed Abdullah A. AlGhamdi, Purushottam Sharma, Vikas Deep |
Mob. Networks Appl. | 5 |