EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aditya Basu
dblp:154/9562
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Systems and software security · 64% Authentication and access control · 19% Hardware security and side channels · 16% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 84% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 16% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security
operating system security |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | TALISMAN: Tamper Analysis for Reference Monitors · NDSS 2024 |
Authentication and access control › access control policy › access control policy enforcement
reference monitor |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | TALISMAN: Tamper Analysis for Reference Monitors · NDSS 2024 |
Systems and software security
operating systems |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Unsafe at Any Copy: Name Collisions from Mixing Case Sensitivities · FAST 2023 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud security
confidential cloud computing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Nimble: Rollback Protection for Confidential Cloud Services · OSDI 2023 |
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments |
0.6 | 2 | 2023 | Hardware Assisted Buffer Protection Mechanisms for Embedded RISC-V · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020 Nimble: Rollback Protection for Confidential Cloud Services · OSDI 2023 |
Systems and software security › memory safety
control-flow integrity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hardware Assisted Buffer Protection Mechanisms for Embedded RISC-V · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020 |
Systems and software security › memory safety › control-flow integrity
hardware-assisted control-flow integrity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hardware Assisted Buffer Protection Mechanisms for Embedded RISC-V · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software portability |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Unsafe at Any Copy: Name Collisions from Mixing Case Sensitivities · FAST 2023 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction set architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Hardware Assisted Buffer Protection Mechanisms for Embedded RISC-V · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
physically unclonable function · 0.9coprocessor design · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | TALISMAN: Tamper Analysis for Reference Monitors
Frank Capobianco, Aditya Basu, Trent Jaeger, Danfeng Zhang |
NDSS | 3 |
| 2024 | Distilling large language models for matching patients to clinical trialsabstractOBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to systematically examine the efficacy of both proprietary (GPT-3.5, GPT-4) and open-source large language models (LLMs) (LLAMA 7B, 13B, 70B) in the context of matching patients to clinical trials in healthcare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study employs a multifaceted evaluation framework, incorporating extensive automated and human-centric assessments along with a detailed error analysis for each model, and assesses LLMs' capabilities in analyzing patient eligibility against clinical trial's inclusion and exclusion criteria. To improve the adaptability of open-source LLMs, a specialized synthetic dataset was created using GPT-4, facilitating effective fine-tuning under constrained data conditions. RESULTS: The findings indicate that open-source LLMs, when fine-tuned on this limited and synthetic dataset, achieve performance parity with their proprietary counterparts, such as GPT-3.5. DISCUSSION: This study highlights the recent success of LLMs in the high-stakes domain of healthcare, specifically in patient-trial matching. The research demonstrates the potential of open-source models to match the performance of proprietary models when fine-tuned appropriately, addressing challenges like cost, privacy, and reproducibility concerns associated with closed-source proprietary LLMs. CONCLUSION: The study underscores the opportunity for open-source LLMs in patient-trial matching. To encourage further research and applications in this field, the annotated evaluation dataset and the fine-tuned LLM, Trial-LLAMA, are released for public use. Mauro Nievas, Aditya Basu, Yanshan Wang, Hrituraj Singh |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 2 |
| 2023 | Unsafe at Any Copy: Name Collisions from Mixing Case Sensitivities
Aditya Basu, Jack Sampson, Zhiyun Qian, Trent Jaeger |
FAST | 1 |
| 2023 | Nimble: Rollback Protection for Confidential Cloud Services
Sebastian Angel, Aditya Basu, Weidong Cui, Trent Jaeger, Stella Lau, Srinath Setty, Sudheesh Singanamalla |
OSDI | 2 |
| 2022 | Placing (Historical) Facts on a Timeline: A Classification Cum Coref Resolution Approach
Sayantan Adak, Altaf Ahmad, Aditya Basu, Animesh Mukherjee 0001 |
ECML/PKDD (6) | 3 |
| 2020 | Hardware Assisted Buffer Protection Mechanisms for Embedded RISC-VabstractRISC-V is a promising open-source architecture that targets low-power embedded devices and system-on-chips (SoCs). However, there is a dearth of practical and low-overhead security solutions in the RISC-V architecture. Programs compiled using RISC-V toolchains are still vulnerable to code injection and code reuse attacks, such as buffer overflow and return-oriented programming (ROP). In this article, we propose two hardware-implemented security extensions to RISC-V that provides a defense mechanism against such attacks. We first employ a physically unclonable function (PUF)-based randomized canary generation technique that removes the need to store the sensitive canary words in memory or CPU registers, thereby being more secure, while incurring low overheads. We implement the proposed Canary Engine in RISC-V RocketChip with rocket custom coprocessor (RoCC). The simulation results show 2.2% average execution overhead with a single buffer protection, while a 10× increase in buffer count only increases the overhead by 1.5× when protection is extended to all buffers. We further improve upon this with a dedicated security coprocessor flow integrity extensions for embedded RISC-V (FIXER), implemented on the RoCC. FIXER enforces fine-grained control-flow integrity (CFI) of running programs on backward edges (returns) and forward edges (calls) without requiring any architectural modifications to the processor core. Compared to software-based solutions, FIXER reduces energy overhead by 60% at minimal execution time (1.5%) and area (2.9%) overheads. Asmit De, Aditya Basu, Swaroop Ghosh, Trent Jaeger |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 2 |
| 2019 | FIXER: Flow Integrity Extensions for Embedded RISC-VabstractWith the recent proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) and embedded devices, there is a growing need to develop a security framework to protect such devices. RISC-V is a promising open source architecture that targets low-power embedded devices and SoCs. However, there is a dearth of practical and low-overhead security solutions in the RISC-V architecture. Programs compiled using RISC-V toolchains are still vulnerable to code injection and code reuse attacks such as buffer overflow and return-oriented programming (ROP). In this paper, we propose FIXER, a hardware implemented security extension to RISC-V that provides a defense mechanism against such attacks. FIXER enforces fine-grained control-flow integrity (CFI) of running programs on backward edges (returns) and forward edges (calls) without requiring any architectural modifications to the RISC-V processor core. We implement FIXER on RocketChip, a RISC-V SoC platform, by leveraging the integrated Rocket Custom Coprocessor (RoCC) to detect and prevent attacks. Compared to existing software based solutions, FIXER reduces energy overhead by 60% at minimal execution time (1.5%) and area (2.9%) overheads. Asmit De, Aditya Basu, Swaroop Ghosh, Trent Jaeger |
DATE | 2 |