Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrés Codas
dblp:155/0760
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 50% Empirical software engineering · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Fault-Aware Neural Code Rankers · NeurIPS 2022 |
Empirical software engineering
fault prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Fault-Aware Neural Code Rankers · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural ranker · 0.6fault-aware training · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Fault-Aware Neural Code RankersabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have demonstrated an impressive ability to generate code for various programming tasks. In many instances, LLMs can generate a correct program for a task when given numerous trials. Consequently, a recent trend is to do large scale sampling of programs using a model and then filtering/ranking the programs based on the program execution on a small number of known unit tests to select one candidate solution. However, these approaches assume that the unit tests are given and assume the ability to safely execute the generated programs (which can do arbitrary dangerous operations such as file manipulations). Both of the above assumptions are impractical in real-world software development. In this paper, we propose CodeRanker, a neural ranker that can predict the correctness of a sampled program without executing it. Our CodeRanker is fault-aware i.e., it is trained to predict different kinds of execution information such as predicting the exact compile/runtime error type (e.g., an IndexError or a TypeError). We show that CodeRanker can significantly increase the pass@1 accuracy of various code generation models (including Codex, GPT-Neo, GPT-J) on APPS, HumanEval and MBPP datasets. Jeevana Priya Inala, Chenglong Wang 0005, Andrés Codas, Mark Encarnación, Shuvendu K. Lahiri, Madan Musuvathi, Jianfeng Gao 0001 |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2008 | Sucker-rod pumping system: Simulator and dynamic level control using bottom hole pressureabstractIn this work a new perspective of the control of a sucker-rod pumping system is presented. In despite of the widely application of control strategies based on dynamometer cards recognition they present several limitations in the control and maintenance aspects. Nowadays, with the development of a new class of low cost downhole sensors, new control strategies could bee applied. In this work, a control framework using the bottom hole pressure combined with a variable speed drive (VSD) structure is proposed. A hardware in the loop simulation platform was developed to evaluate the measure of the bottom hole pressure contribution in a sucker-rod pumping control system. Bernardo Ordoñez, Andrés Codas, Ubirajara Franco Moreno, Alex Teixeira |
ETFA | 2 |