Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bella-Citlali Martínez-Seis

dblp:155/4762 · also Bella Martínez-Seis · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-2553-1364ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 75% Information retrieval · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking
attribute ranking
0.312017
RELNA: Ranking Attributes in Social Networks to Detect Overlapping Communities Efficiently · ICDE 2017
Data mining
clustering
0.312017
RELNA: Ranking Attributes in Social Networks to Detect Overlapping Communities Efficiently · ICDE 2017
Data mining › clustering
model-based clustering
0.312017
RELNA: Ranking Attributes in Social Networks to Detect Overlapping Communities Efficiently · ICDE 2017
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › community detection
overlapping community detection
0.312017
RELNA: Ranking Attributes in Social Networks to Detect Overlapping Communities Efficiently · ICDE 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

similarity measure · 0.3regression analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 RELNA: Ranking Attributes in Social Networks to Detect Overlapping Communities Efficiently
abstract
A community is a group of entities not only with high density but also with similar characteristics. Just recent works have merged the graph structure of the networks with the attributes of nodes. Some of them make weight modification, linear combination, and the most promising are the model-based algorithms, which faces the mixture of structure and attributes in a centralized way, this integration increases the dimensionality of the problem. Moreover, not all the attributes are relevant for that purpose, and there are works that rank attributes in each iteration of the community detection process, others do not consider multiple groups with the same attribute. Based on the principle that linked nodes are likely to adopt similar attributes, we calculated weight to each attribute to get the most RELevant Node Attributes (RELNA) based on the relations of the nodes. We integrated the selected attributes to overlapping community detection methods like the well-known CESNA (Communities from Edge Structure and Node Attributes) and our method QMUCA (Quality Measure to Upgrade Communities using Attributes and structure), which is a model-based approach that uses optimization in a regression analysis and a new similarity measure. Experiments show that QMUCA with the ranking of RELNA improves the performance of the accuracy of other methods, but we are still working on it.
Bella-Citlali Martínez-Seis
ICDE1
2014 Topic hierarchy in social networks
abstract
The increasing usage of on-line social networks has open new research areas such social network analysis. In this survey we review the literature and concepts around this topics with a special emphasis on the hierarchical representation of the graph structure of the social networks. There have been concepts and techniques, of data mining, social networks, and graphs, adapted to this context, taking into consideration that the community structure of a network can be defined as a dendrogram that shows how a network is organized from smaller communities at lower levels to larger ones at higher levels.
Bella-Citlali Martínez-Seis, Xiaoou Li 0001
SMC1