Patrick J. Mineault

dblp:155/6081 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-5519-842XORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 44% 3D vision · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 6%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
motion perception
0.512021
Your head is there to move you around: Goal-driven models of the primate dorsal pathway · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › predictive learning
self-supervised prediction
0.512021
The functional specialization of visual cortex emerges from training parallel pathways with self-supervised predictive learning · NeurIPS 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision › biological vision modeling
visual cortex modeling
0.512021
The functional specialization of visual cortex emerges from training parallel pathways with self-supervised predictive learning · NeurIPS 2021
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.112021
Your head is there to move you around: Goal-driven models of the primate dorsal pathway · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised learning · 1.0predictive coding · 0.5deep neural network · 0.53d resnet · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 The functional specialization of visual cortex emerges from training parallel pathways with self-supervised predictive learning
abstract
The visual system of mammals is comprised of parallel, hierarchical specialized pathways. Different pathways are specialized in so far as they use representations that are more suitable for supporting specific downstream behaviours. In particular, the clearest example is the specialization of the ventral ("what") and dorsal ("where") pathways of the visual cortex. These two pathways support behaviours related to visual recognition and movement, respectively. To-date, deep neural networks have mostly been used as models of the ventral, recognition pathway. However, it is unknown whether both pathways can be modelled with a single deep ANN. Here, we ask whether a single model with a single loss function can capture the properties of both the ventral and the dorsal pathways. We explore this question using data from mice, who like other mammals, have specialized pathways that appear to support recognition and movement behaviours. We show that when we train a deep neural network architecture with two parallel pathways using a self-supervised predictive loss function, we can outperform other models in fitting mouse visual cortex. Moreover, we can model both the dorsal and ventral pathways. These results demonstrate that a self-supervised predictive learning approach applied to parallel pathway architectures can account for some of the functional specialization seen in mammalian visual systems.
Shahab Bakhtiari, Patrick J. Mineault, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Christopher C. Pack, Blake A. Richards
NeurIPS2
2021 Your head is there to move you around: Goal-driven models of the primate dorsal pathway
abstract
Neurons in the dorsal visual pathway of the mammalian brain are selective for motion stimuli, with the complexity of stimulus representations increasing along the hierarchy. This progression is similar to that of the ventral visual pathway, which is well characterized by artificial neural networks (ANNs) optimized for object recognition. In contrast, there are no image-computable models of the dorsal stream with comparable explanatory power. We hypothesized that the properties of dorsal stream neurons could be explained by a simple learning objective: the need for an organism to orient itself during self-motion. To test this hypothesis, we trained a 3D ResNet to predict an agent's self-motion parameters from visual stimuli in a simulated environment. We found that the responses in this network accounted well for the selectivity of neurons in a large database of single-neuron recordings from the dorsal visual stream of non-human primates. In contrast, ANNs trained on an action recognition dataset through supervised or self-supervised learning could not explain responses in the dorsal stream, despite also being trained on naturalistic videos with moving objects. These results demonstrate that an ecologically relevant cost function can account for dorsal stream properties in the primate brain.
Patrick J. Mineault, Shahab Bakhtiari, Blake A. Richards, Christopher C. Pack
NeurIPS1
2018 Community-based benchmarking improves spike rate inference from two-photon calcium imaging data
abstract
In recent years, two-photon calcium imaging has become a standard tool to probe the function of neural circuits and to study computations in neuronal populations. However, the acquired signal is only an indirect measurement of neural activity due to the comparatively slow dynamics of fluorescent calcium indicators. Different algorithms for estimating spike rates from noisy calcium measurements have been proposed in the past, but it is an open question how far performance can be improved. Here, we report the results of the spikefinder challenge, launched to catalyze the development of new spike rate inference algorithms through crowd-sourcing. We present ten of the submitted algorithms which show improved performance compared to previously evaluated methods. Interestingly, the top-performing algorithms are based on a wide range of principles from deep neural networks to generative models, yet provide highly correlated estimates of the neural activity. The competition shows that benchmark challenges can drive algorithmic developments in neuroscience.
Philipp Berens, Jeremy Freeman, Thomas Deneux, Nicolay Chenkov, Thomas McColgan, Artur Speiser, Jakob H. Macke, Srinivas C. Turaga, Patrick J. Mineault, Peter Rupprecht, Stephan Gerhard, Rainer W. Friedrich, Johannes Friedrich, Liam Paninski, Marius Pachitariu, Kenneth D. Harris, Ben Bolte, Timothy A. Machado, Dario Ringach, Jasmine Stone, Luke E. Rogerson, Nicolas J. Sofroniew, Jacob Reimer, Emmanouil Froudarakis, Thomas Euler, Miroslav Román Rosón, Lucas Theis, Andreas S. Tolias, Matthias Bethge
PLoS Comput. Biol.9