Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nikolaos Karianakis
dblp:155/9974
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 34% Optimization for machine learning · 21% 3D vision · 15% | |
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Edge and fog computing · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 44% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 44% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 13% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Edge and fog computing
video analytics |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Gemel: Model Merging for Memory-Efficient, Real-Time Video Analytics at the Edge · NSDI 2023 Ekya: Continuous Learning of Video Analytics Models on Edge Compute Servers · NSDI 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
1.2 | 2 | 2024 | HyperSTAR: Task-Aware Hyperparameter Recommendation for Training and Compression · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2024 HyperSTAR: Task-Aware Hyperparameters for Deep Networks · CVPR 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
neural network accelerator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Latency-Aware DNN Design With GPU Tail Effect Analysis · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Latency-Aware DNN Design With GPU Tail Effect Analysis · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gemel: Model Merging for Memory-Efficient, Real-Time Video Analytics at the Edge · NSDI 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gemel: Model Merging for Memory-Efficient, Real-Time Video Analytics at the Edge · NSDI 2023 |
Edge and fog computing
continuous learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Ekya: Continuous Learning of Video Analytics Models on Edge Compute Servers · NSDI 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | HyperSTAR: Task-Aware Hyperparameters for Deep Networks · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
person re-identification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Reinforced Temporal Attention and Split-Rate Transfer for Depth-Based Person Re-identification · ECCV (5) 2018 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Latency-Aware DNN Design With GPU Tail Effect Analysis · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
invariant representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
local feature descriptor |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
multi-view geometry |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › multi-image matching
multi-view matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › local feature matching
wide-baseline matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multi-view feature engineering and learning · CVPR 2015 |
Edge and fog computing › video analytics
real-time video analytics |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Gemel: Model Merging for Memory-Efficient, Real-Time Video Analytics at the Edge · NSDI 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Ekya: Continuous Learning of Video Analytics Models on Edge Compute Servers · NSDI 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
temporal attention |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Reinforced Temporal Attention and Split-Rate Transfer for Depth-Based Person Re-identification · ECCV (5) 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | An Empirical Evaluation of Current Convolutional Architectures' Ability to Manage Nuisance Location and Scale Variability · CVPR 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
video analytics · 1.1model retraining · 1.1neural architecture search · 0.9model pruning · 0.9task-aware hyperparameter recommendation · 0.8warm-starting · 0.4performance prediction · 0.4bayesian optimization · 0.4transfer learning · 0.3reinforcement learning · 0.3proposal heuristics · 0.2marginalization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Click&Describe: Multimodal Grounding and Tracking for Aerial ObjectsabstractThe fusion of multiple modalities, such as vision and language, has led to significant progress in grounding and tracking tasks. However, this success has not yet translated to aerial single-object tracking (SOT) due to the lack of text annotations in existing aerial SOT datasets. To overcome this limitation, we provide text annotations for five existing aerial datasets, designed to support and promote multi-modal research in the aerial tracking domain. Furthermore, to address challenges such as small object dimensions, similar-looking objects, and target size fluctuations, we introduce a third input modality: click (or point prompt). We seamlessly integrate click and language information in the model's input to offer a user-friendly and interactive alternative to precise bounding box annotations. This enables approximate target specification with reduced effort and time. We introduce CLaVi, a novel multimodal framework that redefines input interaction by in-corporating multiple modalities. This integration improves target localization and tracking efficiency, providing a significant advancement in the way input is provided to the model. Furthermore, we conduct experiments on the five datasets, to provide AerTrack-460 benchmark, to validate the effectiveness of our approach. AerTrack-460 benchmark shows competitive performance and, in some cases, outperforms previous language-based grounding and tracking techniques, setting a strong baseline for future research. Code and data will be made available soon. Rupanjali Kukal, Jay Patravali, Fuxun Yu, Simranjit Singh 0003, Nikolaos Karianakis, Rishi Madhok |
WACV | 5 |
| 2025 | Rethinking Latency-Aware DNN Design With GPU Tail Effect AnalysisabstractAs the size of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) continues to grow, their runtime latency also scales. While model pruning and Neural Architecture Search (NAS) can effectively reduce the computation workload, their effectiveness fails to consistently translate into runtime latency reduction. In this paper, we identify the root cause behind the mismatch between workload reduction and latency reduction is GPU tail effect – a classic system issue caused by resource under-utilization in the last processing wave of the GPU. We conduct detailed DNN workload characterization and demonstrate the prevalence of GPU tail effect across different DNN architectures, and meanwhile reveal that the unique deep structure and the light-weight layer workload of DNNs exacerbate the tail effect for DNN inference. We then propose a tail-awareness design space enhancement and DNN optimization algorithm to optimize existing NAS and pruning designs and achieve better runtime latency and model accuracy performance. Extensive experiments show 11%-27% latency reduction over SOTA DNN pruning and NAS methods. Fuxun Yu, Longfei Shangguan, Di Wang 0003, Dimitrios Stamoulis, Rishi Madhok, Nikolaos Karianakis, Ang Li 0005, Yiran Chen 0001, Xiang Chen 0010 |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 7 |
| 2024 | HyperSTAR: Task-Aware Hyperparameter Recommendation for Training and Compression
Chang Liu 0022, Gaurav Mittal, Nikolaos Karianakis, Victor Fragoso, Ye Yu 0003, Yun Fu 0001 |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 3 |
| 2023 | Gemel: Model Merging for Memory-Efficient, Real-Time Video Analytics at the Edge
Arthi Padmanabhan, Neil Agarwal, Anand Padmanabha Iyer, Ganesh Ananthanarayanan, Yuanchao Shu, Nikolaos Karianakis, Guoqing Harry Xu, Ravi Netravali |
NSDI | 6 |
| 2022 | Ekya: Continuous Learning of Video Analytics Models on Edge Compute Servers
Romil Bhardwaj, Zhengxu Xia, Ganesh Ananthanarayanan, Junchen Jiang, Yuanchao Shu, Nikolaos Karianakis, Kevin Hsieh, Paramvir Bahl, Ion Stoica |
NSDI | 6 |
| 2022 | SC-UDA: Style and Content Gaps aware Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Object DetectionabstractCurrent state-of-the-art object detectors can have significant performance drop when deployed in the wild due to domain gaps with training data. Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) is a promising approach to adapt detectors for new domains/environments without any expensive label cost. Previous mainstream UDA works for object detection usually focused on image-level and/or feature-level adaptation by using adversarial learning methods. In this work, we show that such adversarial-based methods can only reduce domain style gap, but cannot address the domain content gap that is also important for object detectors. To overcome this limitation, we propose the SC-UDA framework to concurrently reduce both gaps: We propose fine-grained domain style transfer to reduce the style gaps with finer image details preserved for detecting small objects; Then we leverage the pseudo label-based self-training to reduce content gaps; To address pseudo label error accumulation during self-training, novel optimizations are proposed, including uncertainty-based pseudo labeling and imbalanced mini-batch sampling strategy. Experiment results show that our approach consistently outperforms prior state-of-the-art methods (up to 8.6%, 2.7% and 2.5% mAP on three UDA benchmarks). Fuxun Yu, Di Wang 0003, Yinpeng Chen, Nikolaos Karianakis, Pei Yu, Dimitrios Lymberopoulos, Sidi Lu, Weisong Shi, Xiang Chen 0010 |
WACV | 4 |
| 2020 | BLT: Balancing Long-Tailed Datasets with Adversarially-Perturbed Images
Jedrzej Kozerawski, Victor Fragoso, Nikolaos Karianakis, Gaurav Mittal, Matthew Turk 0001 |
ACCV (3) | 3 |
| 2020 | HyperSTAR: Task-Aware Hyperparameters for Deep NetworksabstractWhile deep neural networks excel in solving visual recognition tasks, they require significant effort to find hyperparameters that make them work optimally. Hyperparameter Optimization (HPO) approaches have automated the process of finding good hyperparameters but they do not adapt to a given task (task-agnostic), making them computationally inefficient. To reduce HPO time, we present HyperSTAR (System for Task Aware Hyperparameter Recommendation), a task-aware method to warm-start HPO for deep neural networks. HyperSTAR ranks and recommends hyperparameters by predicting their performance conditioned on a joint dataset-hyperparameter space. It learns a dataset (task) representation along with the performance predictor directly from raw images in an end-to-end fashion. The recommendations, when integrated with an existing HPO method, make it task-aware and significantly reduce the time to achieve optimal performance. We conduct extensive experiments on 10 publicly available large-scale image classification datasets over two different network architectures, validating that HyperSTAR evaluates 50% less configurations to achieve the best performance compared to existing methods. We further demonstrate that HyperSTAR makes Hyperband (HB) task-aware, achieving the optimal accuracy in just 25% of the budget required by both vanilla HB and Bayesian Optimized HB (BOHB). Gaurav Mittal, Chang Liu 0022, Nikolaos Karianakis, Victor Fragoso, Yun Fu 0001 |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2018 | Reinforced Temporal Attention and Split-Rate Transfer for Depth-Based Person Re-identification
Nikolaos Karianakis, Zicheng Liu 0001, Yinpeng Chen, Stefano Soatto |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2016 | An Empirical Evaluation of Current Convolutional Architectures' Ability to Manage Nuisance Location and Scale VariabilityabstractWe conduct an empirical study to test the ability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to reduce the effects of nuisance transformations of the input data, such as location, scale and aspect ratio. We isolate factors by adopting a common convolutional architecture either deployed globally on the image to compute class posterior distributions, or restricted locally to compute class conditional distributions given location, scale and aspect ratios of bounding boxes determined by proposal heuristics. In theory, averaging the latter should yield inferior performance compared to proper marginalization. Yet empirical evidence suggests the converse, leading us to conclude that - at the current level of complexity of convolutional architectures and scale of the data sets used to train them - CNNs are not very effective at marginalizing nuisance variability. We also quantify the effects of context on the overall classification task and its impact on the performance of CNNs, and propose improved sampling techniques for heuristic proposal schemes that improve end-to-end performance to state-of-the-art levels. We test our hypothesis on a classification task using the ImageNet Challenge benchmark and on a wide-baseline matching task using the Oxford and Fischer's datasets. Nikolaos Karianakis, Jingming Dong, Stefano Soatto |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2015 | Multi-view feature engineering and learningabstractWe frame the problem of local representation of imaging data as the computation of minimal sufficient statistics that are invariant to nuisance variability induced by viewpoint and illumination. We show that, under very stringent conditions, these are related to “feature descriptors” commonly used in Computer Vision. Such conditions can be relaxed if multiple views of the same scene are available. We propose a sampling-based and a point-estimate based approximation of such a representation, compared empirically on image-to-(multiple)image matching, for which we introduce a multi-view wide-baseline matching benchmark, consisting of a mixture of real and synthetic objects with ground truth camera motion and dense three-dimensional geometry. Jingming Dong, Nikolaos Karianakis, Damek Davis, Joshua Hernandez, Jonathan Balzer, Stefano Soatto |
CVPR | 2 |